Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
6 Pages  1 2 3 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.19, D7100 announced weeeee~

views
     
KTCY
post Feb 21 2013, 12:36 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
D7100 drool.gif
KTCY
post Feb 21 2013, 12:40 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(vearn27 @ Feb 21 2013, 12:37 PM)
A more affordable version of D800E without AA filter biggrin.gif
*
D600 can throw already laugh.gif
KTCY
post Feb 24 2013, 10:34 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
24/1.4G ! Come back to papa wub.gif
KTCY
post Feb 25 2013, 09:44 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
Nikon acknowledge D600 dust and oil issue.
I just sent an email to Nikon Malaysia Penang branch to see whether a full wet clean up from sensor is possible smile.gif

http://support.nikonusa.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/18180

https://nikoneurope-en.custhelp.com/app/ans...tail/a_id/55647
KTCY
post Mar 1 2013, 08:57 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
Anyone wanna sell their 35mm f/1.8 ? tongue.gif
KTCY
post Mar 1 2013, 10:29 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Silverfire @ Mar 1 2013, 10:07 AM)
About 2 months old, like new condition tongue.gif
*
Prefer COD even is almost new items.

Last night I went COD with this fellow at FTZ ! \

QUOTE
35mm f1.8 -RM600 DX lens. VR 55-200mm f4 nikkor long lens- RM600. Take both RM1100 Interested only call me. Mr.Leong : 016-4910867. COD in Penang. Msg will not reply. Thanks - Leong kar Chuen <brandonkcleong@hotmail.com>


Called him up, everything was ok. and when almost time to COD, i text the seller told him i will late a little as traffic was quite bad. Then he replied that take your time, drive safely. I was sweat.gif but thumbup.gif because of his patience.

Then when I reached COD place, the fellow told me the lens is quite new . So i checked the condition. seems new. And the fellow told me almost 3 yrs already but unfilled warranty card. Fine for me.

Then, i tested out, seems fine. Focus was accurate. Then when I checked the rear lens, holy shits ! Full of fungus sweat.gif
The seller didn't even tell me from start. And when I show him, he seems a little panic and uneasy (cause I found out ?! laugh.gif ) then told me fungus is fine ! I was like dafuq ?! Then told him brand new only around 750 and wanna sell me RM 550 for full of fungus lens ?! Cleaning will cost around 200+ already. Again he mentioned no need clean, it won't effect the lens. doh.gif

So, I just wanna be safe. Scare already. Luckily I use my mobile phone flash light to check the lens condition. biggrin.gif
KTCY
post Mar 1 2013, 10:39 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Mar 1 2013, 10:34 AM)
rear of lens full of fungus, how come can focus one  hmm.gif
i thought can see one? i blur blur of how camera focus now  rclxub.gif
*
Some how it can be focus. and the focus image seems sharp laugh.gif
i guess the fungus is in the glass not really rear. as I was at McD, the light was quite dim and I only use my phone camera light to check it. but i can tell you, when I see all the fungus, i feel sweat.gif sweat.gif

This post has been edited by KTCY: Mar 1 2013, 10:39 AM
KTCY
post Mar 1 2013, 10:46 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(ifer @ Mar 1 2013, 10:42 AM)
Eh one question: lens cant focus when got fungus meh?
*
I don't know. Focus well on my camera tho. tongue.gif
KTCY
post Mar 1 2013, 02:16 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
why need f/16 ?
I open the aperture blade see thru light can view perfectly clear already lo tongue.gif
KTCY
post Mar 1 2013, 04:18 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Decky @ Mar 1 2013, 03:04 PM)
Hey guys, I'm sort of in a purchase dilemma here and I need some advice.

Depending on my results, I am most likely going to be getting a D600 body with 1 prime lens and perhaps a flash unit.

My estimated budget is around RM8k

I want a prime only because I like shooting with them (wider aperture + cheap +sharp + makes me think about framing alot)

From my past experience, my most favorite focal length (and hence my best shots) are from the fujifilm x100's 23mm f2 lens (which is around 36mm on FF). I'm currently using a 35mm on a crop sensor body and while I don't mind the 52mm focal length, I just prefer a slightly wider view. (I don't prefer to take headshots)

So I've been considering the D600 + 28mm f1.8g combo as the lens seems to be really really good and it's wide. The problem being that it's gonna consume my whole budget leaving no space for a speedlite and that I've forgot how it's like to have 28mm on FF equivalent sensors. If my calculations are right, 28mm on FF would be around 18mm-ish on a crop sensor? 18mm on crop was rather wide to me last time, not sure about now. I really want 35mm on FF, but since I can't afford even the sigma alternative, I thought perhaps 28mm won't be too far off.

My question being, is 7mm a big difference?

My other option is to get the 50mm f1.8g which isn't too stressful on my wallet. But having lived with a 52mm FOV and thinking that it's just "slightly" too narrow for my comfort, I'm also a little worried.

So do you think I should get the 50mm f1.8g and save up for a 35mm or stick with the 28mm?
The plan is to get 3 primes for my kit first. (either the 28mm, 50mm and 85mm or the 35mm 50mm then 85mm)
*
D600 (RM 5900) + Nikkor 35mm f/2D (1050) + SB700 (1k)
Nicely in your budget biggrin.gif

This post has been edited by KTCY: Mar 1 2013, 04:21 PM
KTCY
post Mar 1 2013, 08:45 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Decky @ Mar 1 2013, 05:15 PM)
Is it a MF lens?

I guess I'm also thinking of futureproofing etc. so I think I'm still stuck between getting a 50mm and saving for a good 35mm or getting the 28mm as a replacement.

is 7mm alot?
*
7mm for guy means a lot laugh.gif
so does DSLR world but I guess 35mm is wide enough

KTCY
post Mar 3 2013, 01:35 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(pspslim007 @ Mar 2 2013, 09:36 PM)
erm is it stupid to get a 35mm 2f if i have a 50mm 1.4f ?
*
used to own both. Nothing stupid
KTCY
post Mar 3 2013, 02:00 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(alpha_company @ Mar 3 2013, 01:50 AM)
You can see the seriousness of the problem.. he sold it within 2 weeks.. I could have sold it within a month if I had a buyer then, but needed to wait another month for a buyer. You would NOT see the problem when testing it at the shop... unless you can take specific kinds of test shots at the shop and transfer the images into a PC/laptop and look at it. Yeah right...

Like I explained before in my previous post, dont be surprised if some said it is a great lens. They tested it out on a ONE subject at mostly wide open apertures. IT"S JUST IMPOSSIBLE to see it at those settings.Yeah this lens is great at wide open (sharpness,colour) but the reviewers who saw this problem tested it on numerous other things/subjects including a focus chart at various apertures. I just dont know why nikon produced such a flawed lens. Im not so surprised as around the same time they produced the D600 with the dust problem which is a PHYSICAL defect/design & D800 with the left focus point issue. I can understand software/firmware defects but if its physical, especially if it's the insides of the camera or lens.. i'm much better off buying older proven technology.

Yes, exactly.. field curvature does that but the most horrible thing is when this two guys come together : FIELD CURVATURE & FOCUS SHIFT .. Double trouble. I explained it in my previous post. You'll know pain when you take group shots and the center is soft/blurred, the guy standing on the SAME LINE at the left & right is sharp, the guy on the THIRD LINE is sharpest .. WTF?

You can find a used AFD 35 f2... the lens is tough enough cause it doenst have an af motor. a used AF 35mm f2 (non-D) will be much cheaper. Both will AF fine on your camera.

FYI, the OLD Nikon 85mm 1.4D is still in production.. the OLD Nikon 50 1.8D is still in production.. the OLD Nikon 20 2.8D is still in production. Guess what? The 35D is still in production.. why? market wise if this lens was discontinued, what other 35mm prime can you buy for FX? The AFS 35 1.4G? you know how much that costs? Nikon doesnt want people to buy to Sigma/Tamron lenses..they need variety in their product line (price wise).

Dont think Nikon will fix it? Man.. if you buy new, it has a warranty card. THEY WILL FIX IT.

Resale value of the 35D? Around 700-900 depends on age/condition/warranty etc..
*
I sold my 1yr+ near to 2 yr 35D around 900 biggrin.gif

btw, 24/1.4G good ? tongue.gif
KTCY
post Mar 3 2013, 02:56 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(alpha_company @ Mar 3 2013, 02:07 AM)
Muahahahah... if the lens cost 1.2k ..how much lower can it go down lah kann.. haha.. lucky lah u rugi a bit only..dont know y some people worry too much..hehe..

Nikon needs to stop the production of the OLD 24 2.8D so that everybody can buy the 24 1.4G... cause Nikon knows that everybody has lombong emas belakang rumah.. thumbup.gif
*
I bought 1050 only blush.gif tongue.gif

so 24/1.4G good la ? tongue.gif
KTCY
post Mar 3 2013, 07:07 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Silverfire @ Mar 3 2013, 06:45 PM)
iM4U!
user posted image

Jason Chen
user posted image

Chester See
user posted image

David Choi
user posted image

Marianne
user posted image

Reuben
user posted image
*
70-200 VR II ?
saw that you have 24mm too. 24-85 ?
KTCY
post Mar 4 2013, 11:08 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
Tested siggy 50/1.4
Even bright day light, the focus is not accurate.
I was focusing on the eyes but end up sharp at hair sweat.gif
KTCY
post Mar 5 2013, 09:28 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
I saw my name. Whats up ? tongue.gif
KTCY
post Mar 7 2013, 08:42 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(ifer @ Mar 7 2013, 08:15 AM)
dont worry.
i am a slow learner too.
when i started photography, i got a nikon 801s and occasionally use my friend's FM 2 plus a sigma 24-70 lens.
i didn't go to the extend of whether 3rd party lens was sharp enough nor did i consider whether the sigma has front/back focus or not.

i was just happy because i have a camera to take photograph with. i guess the world has changed but what i am trying to say here is don't let the so call limited equipment stop you from enjoying yourself in taking photographs.

oh, another thing is, i was a lot more concern about mixing the chemicals and processing the films rather than the lenses and camera specs hahaa
*
@bold : That's more interesting than sharp or not sharp tongue.gif

KTCY
post Mar 7 2013, 12:39 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
A forumer sent me this PM. Please help him wink.gif

newbie newbie icon_question.gif icon_question.gif

ask you something about dslr as i'm planning to get one for myself.
normally people will upgrade or change their dslr after using how many years? or it depend on the person? mean did u ever see people stick with the same model camera more than 5 years?..coz i always think that why we need to change the camera if the camera still working well or let say once we get bored with the lens we still can buy another lens right ? or the camera can actually use for few years and after few years it will occur many problem ? as i know once we take good care of it even 10 years also not a problem.. icon_question.gif
----
coz my own opinion. once i bought camera i think i will stick with the camera for 4 years or more unless there occurs problem on my camera. otherwise i will only change the lenses once i get bored instead of changing camera ? do you agree with my opinion ? hmm.gif
-----
might tell me before this most long that u stick with ur camera is how long ? hmm.gif
KTCY
post Mar 8 2013, 10:54 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Mar 8 2013, 10:45 AM)
seems like ImBoYbOy is spamming everyone's PM with same questions  laugh.gif

he was ask about shutter count i mentioned, how long DSLR he can keep bla bla bla
and can DSLR keep for 10 yrs?

i ask him back" can a car can keep for 10 years too?"  tongue.gif
ImBoYbOy, you actually just ask here we just reply here, there is no need shy for this. tongue.gif

because we can get more post count and stars whistling.gif
*
I just reply one sentence

Different people, different perspective laugh.gif

6 Pages  1 2 3 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0486sec    0.40    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 08:31 AM