Outline ·
[ Standard ] ·
Linear+
Basic Intake and Exhaust Modification Guide, for normal aspirated cars v1.0
|
kweng84
|
Dec 27 2006, 02:25 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(thom_chai @ Dec 20 2006, 09:21 AM) Now that i've removed the kucing from my exhaust, i plan to install a 4-2-1 exhaust header in the future. The question is, do i need to change the whole piping to complement the new header? It is not compulsory. Changing the whole piping to a bigger inlet size will smoothen ur ride in high ends. But, it also depends to the end muffler u r using. If u r using straight flow, it is recommended to change ur piping size as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Dec 27 2006, 03:47 PM
|
|
QUOTE(thom_chai @ Dec 20 2006, 09:21 AM) Now that i've removed the kucing from my exhaust, i plan to install a 4-2-1 exhaust header in the future. The question is, do i need to change the whole piping to complement the new header? not really necessary, but it is better to do so But beware of your FC, sometimes it helps sometimes it doens't~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
thom_chai
|
Dec 27 2006, 11:05 PM
|
|
QUOTE(shinjite @ Dec 27 2006, 03:47 PM) not really necessary, but it is better to do so But beware of your FC, sometimes it helps sometimes it doens't~~ You mean by changing the header or the piping that might affects the fc? The header that i wanted is the one from powerzone
|
|
|
|
|
|
whatdamn
|
Dec 28 2006, 10:56 PM
|
|
thom_chai, the only reason you fuel consumption might increase is because you think you feel the power, so you keep a wide open throttle (WOT).
the feel is minimal and will leave you wanting more power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
kweng84
|
Dec 29 2006, 07:22 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(thom_chai @ Dec 27 2006, 11:05 PM) You mean by changing the header or the piping that might affects the fc? The header that i wanted is the one from powerzone  nah.. i dont think he means that..but headers depend on individuals. Everyone's driving style isn't the same, u might wanna rev until 3krpm and shifts...but some will like to revv till 6krpm and shifts...So, the power needed at different rpm band needs different header designs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
shinjite
|
Dec 30 2006, 02:27 AM
|
|
QUOTE(thom_chai @ Dec 27 2006, 11:05 PM) You mean by changing the header or the piping that might affects the fc? The header that i wanted is the one from powerzone  What I mean is by the piping, header its okay
|
|
|
|
|
|
PonG
|
Jan 24 2007, 03:34 PM
|
Getting Started

|
what is the best setup for kancil 660?
If change 3-1 extractor have any effect?
|
|
|
|
|
|
kweng84
|
Jan 27 2007, 08:41 AM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(PonG @ Jan 24 2007, 03:34 PM) what is the best setup for kancil 660? If change 3-1 extractor have any effect? Bro, stock design is already 3-1. However, changing to a bigger inlet one will help in better pick up power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
lonewolf
|
Feb 13 2007, 03:47 PM
|
|
i have a question...
presume i have 2 sets of 4-1 extrac..
but the join for the 4 pipe is at a diffrent position..
one is nearer to the engine...one is further...
so what;s the difference in performance gain?
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSsoulfly
|
Feb 16 2007, 03:19 PM
|
revving towards 10,000 rpm
|
the further will give better midrange power
|
|
|
|
|
|
sledgehammer
|
Feb 24 2007, 10:33 AM
|
|
wanna ask the sifu all here....  for simple mod like a forumer here selling in automotive garage, the Mini Turbo, i understand that it actually provides auxilary intake for the engine.... but the auxilary intake actually bypass the maf or map sensors.... all cars come from manufacturer is tuned to run richer a little bit to prolong the engine life.... thus this gadget shd cause the engine to run a little leaner than stock.... so theoretically if the air fuel mixture is slightly leaner than stock after using mini turbo, will it cause any problem? or the AF ratio will be more perfect (close to 14:1) after using this gadget? (since stock setting is always running richer than usual)
|
|
|
|
|
|
steamboat
|
Feb 25 2007, 04:34 PM
|
Getting Started

|
wan to ask... drop-in or open pod filter better for an auto car?
|
|
|
|
|
|
VarioCam
|
Feb 26 2007, 05:29 PM
|
Getting Started

|
QUOTE(soulfly @ Feb 14 2006, 03:01 PM) 6. Catalytic converter...to remove or not? It depends. Cat converters are the biggest restriction to the exhaust gas flow. Removing it will definitely release some more power, but it is bad for environment. If your engine is badly tuned or always running rich, I suggest that just leave them on. Cat converters do not contribute anything to exhaust noise.
soulfly, does that mean if my fueling will be a lot more richer if i remove the cat? i thought it's gonna be tad leaner due to more airflow meh?
|
|
|
|
|
|
sledgehammer
|
Feb 26 2007, 07:21 PM
|
|
QUOTE(VarioCam @ Feb 26 2007, 05:29 PM) soulfly, does that mean if my fueling will be a lot more richer if i remove the cat? i thought it's gonna be tad leaner due to more airflow meh?  if i am not mistaken, engine which run rich or badly tune will lead to black smoke emission.... thus the cat will actually reduce the pollution via its chemical reaction... pls correct me if i am wrong coz i am still newbie in cars..
|
|
|
|
|
|
TSsoulfly
|
Feb 26 2007, 08:57 PM
|
revving towards 10,000 rpm
|
the CAT's purpose is to reduce emission
it does not affect fuel consumption by itself. most probably it'll be just driver's foot behaviour.
but theoretically more power = more fuel
|
|
|
|
|
|
icyd
|
Feb 26 2007, 09:24 PM
|
|
to sifu's here..after more reading,i found myself to be more confused abt this exhaust mod thing.but the idea i have in mind is restrictive=more torque,less top speed, free flow=more top speed,less torque.is this correct?can we use this as general rule of thumb? so,does it mean removing cat con is reduce restriction thus only increase power in high rpm?
im getting even more confused when some shop i asked,if want pickup,reduce restriction,go for straight flow muffler.
|
|
|
|
|
|
tunertoobe
|
Feb 26 2007, 10:01 PM
|
|
It's not about the exhaust being restrictive. This is a common mistake among people, back pressure doesnt contribute into producing more torque.
Actually, smaller exhausts leads to a faster exhaust gas speed(Bernoulli principle). When the exhaust is traveling out, it leaves a pocket of vacuum behind it. This pocket of vacuum makes it easier for the next pulse of exhaust gas to go out(less restriction). But this only works if the gases are in pulses(like in lo revs). As the gas moves out in a stream(higher revs), its useless so bigger exhausts produce more power. Just as an example, have you ever thought why exhaust pipes of a bus is small?
This post has been edited by tunertoobe: Feb 26 2007, 10:04 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
icyd
|
Feb 26 2007, 10:23 PM
|
|
oic..good xplanation there.so what happen when the pipe too small?there'll be even more torque then,like the case of bus exhaust.so whenever theres increment of pipe diameter,some amount of torque will disappear,or shifted to higher rpm,straight flow or s-flow doesnt matter.correct me if im wrong
|
|
|
|
|
|
tunertoobe
|
Feb 26 2007, 10:50 PM
|
|
I'm not sure what happens if the pipe is too small. I'm not sure the physics behind a straight flow exhaust, but I think it's something about making sure the input and output pressure difference minimal. When the exhaust gas goes through a bend, the gases slow down and the exhaust behind it piles up, making it more restrictive. Not sure if my explanation is accurate as I am not a tuner, need sifus to explain.
|
|
|
|
|