the low light is very impressive

this for share
http://www.nokia.com/global/products/purev...n-1todtmt4143a4

the lumia got no xenon flash, and i think i read somewhere that the low light shots are 1.3mp.

if it have a longer exposure + stablizer + bigger aperture you dont need flash.

The problem with 808 xenon flash you cant control the power

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Sep 6 2012, 12:29 AM

depends what ur shooting, 'quantity of light' vs 'quality of light'.
plus longer exposure or stabilizer obviously cannot stop ppl from moving

the nokia whitepaper anyway makes it clear on the differences between the 808 and lumia.
better image vs better lowlight, HD video vs OIS video.

920 vs 808
how about micro shot..bokeh background..

Can't wait to check out its noise control compared to 808 and HTC ONE X(f2.0 too).

For me the most tempting feature is the 920 screen

This post has been edited by hox: Sep 6 2012, 12:34 AM

anyway, the f/2.4 of 808 and f/2.0 of lumia which is only 1/2 step difference is kinda insignificant for such a short focal length of 26mm.

but 808 still got video stabilisation right..

it does but its not as good as on the lumia 920

digital only...not as effective as OIS.

Considering the fact that most people don't give a toss about 41Mp picture, with this wireless charging, great photo and video output, free music for american users, and lots of apps in store, this handphone can I think turn nokia around. It satisfy most users requirement except for those hardcore photographer.

haha looks like WP8 poison already spread up 2 here also

This post has been edited by skylinelover: Sep 6 2012, 12:45 AM

8cm nearer with no lossless zoom... u guess leh?

errr..808 win?

for normal consumer 920 is just ideal because OIS. Just imagine ppl say my hand like tripod if + OIS is like haha.

808 wins at Megapixels and Nokia Rich Recording

This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Sep 6 2012, 12:49 AM

if turn around means nokia to be no.3 maybe but to unseat the top 2 a bit hard, for an entrant to really disrupt an established incumbents, their new products almost always need to be an entirely new category or with drastically more unique and never-before-seen features. the gimmicky map feature we see today is not new (iOS apps) and in reality, the UX is not practical and close to unusable. The only one true but small innovative feature we see today is the camera/video editing features for 920 using the Scadalo technologies and maybe the screen refresh rate improvement.

furthermore, launching a device without specific pricing or release dates is considered as suicidal in this climate. Nokia shares just plunge 10% on both sides of the Atlantic following the launches.

This post has been edited by hox: Sep 6 2012, 12:57 AM

Some quick minded bright sparks just posted this :

LOL... BUSTED!!!!!!!