QUOTE(abafamny_90 @ Sep 5 2012, 10:38 AM)
nah i mean other platform one... not this, but i think same concept haha Nokia 808 - V02 - [The King of Camera Phones], PUREVIEW - The Legend of Camera Phone!!!
Nokia 808 - V02 - [The King of Camera Phones], PUREVIEW - The Legend of Camera Phone!!!
|
|
Sep 5 2012, 10:46 AM
|
|
Elite
11,861 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Bangalasia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 5 2012, 10:59 AM
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(little ice @ Sep 5 2012, 12:55 AM) another comparison between PV808 and Nikon J1. u say u used LR? why not just edit the 808 OOC pic?tried my best to match the 808 with the J1 which captured the actual color temperature from what i saw in person. i believe i pretty much nailed the color of the sushi but ended up with green mayonnaise and green plate. after spending quite a bit of time fiddling the color, i gave up. yes, wrong focus point of the J1, while 808 got it right and easy by tapping the finger on the desire spot, and clearly shows me as an incompetent photographer. but the color? i only have a choice of the AWB, or cloudy WB which much too orangey and impossible to recover. and those are the only 2 shots i made and ended up keeping it back inside my pocket as a phone... this is just a quick one. more can be done if u want to spend time on it, slowly dodging / burning / more color balancing etc to prevent any blown outs. here's the same pic thats been sent thru a shareware called neat image to smoothen out the noise. This post has been edited by Everdying: Sep 5 2012, 11:03 AM |
|
|
Sep 5 2012, 12:03 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,242 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: |
QUOTE(Everdying @ Sep 5 2012, 10:59 AM) u say u used LR? why not just edit the 808 OOC pic? actually the OOC picture is the "before" of the "after" i posted - cropped out the right empty portion so it looks different.this is just a quick one. more can be done if u want to spend time on it, slowly dodging / burning / more color balancing etc to prevent any blown outs. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « i can see you taken out quite a lot of green so the outcome looked so much more reddish. i'm more concern of the overall colors whether they're "intact" from all R/G/B channels - white balance is one thing but it doesn't seems to capture a more complete colors. talking about white balance - how can a camera mistaken that strong yellowish lighting? i still love the details captured, and it has very good dynamic range too, very good for outdoor shots. but once the lightings get dimmer and complicated, the color processing really start to get funky at times. not something Nokia can't fix though but if that's the best they can do i must say the 808 isn't a "complete" revolution. the first thing when people look at the photo is the subject and closely followed by colors, then only start pixel peep... |
|
|
Sep 5 2012, 01:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,054 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: Johor Bahru, Johor |
QUOTE(little ice @ Sep 5 2012, 01:03 PM) actually the OOC picture is the "before" of the "after" i posted - cropped out the right empty portion so it looks different. agreed! colors in 808 sometimes can be blue-ish. with the limited WB options you can't seem to get yellow/orange-ish scenery it correctly though i can see you taken out quite a lot of green so the outcome looked so much more reddish. i'm more concern of the overall colors whether they're "intact" from all R/G/B channels - white balance is one thing but it doesn't seems to capture a more complete colors. talking about white balance - how can a camera mistaken that strong yellowish lighting? i still love the details captured, and it has very good dynamic range too, very good for outdoor shots. but once the lightings get dimmer and complicated, the color processing really start to get funky at times. not something Nokia can't fix though but if that's the best they can do i must say the 808 isn't a "complete" revolution. the first thing when people look at the photo is the subject and closely followed by colors, then only start pixel peep... but 808 got a very good dynamic range and it is awesome! despite the fish-eyed lens effect |
|
|
Sep 5 2012, 02:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
666 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
|
|
|
Sep 5 2012, 03:14 PM
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(little ice @ Sep 5 2012, 12:03 PM) actually the OOC picture is the "before" of the "after" i posted - cropped out the right empty portion so it looks different. actually i didnt touch green...just boosted red abit.i can see you taken out quite a lot of green so the outcome looked so much more reddish. i'm more concern of the overall colors whether they're "intact" from all R/G/B channels - white balance is one thing but it doesn't seems to capture a more complete colors. talking about white balance - how can a camera mistaken that strong yellowish lighting? i still love the details captured, and it has very good dynamic range too, very good for outdoor shots. but once the lightings get dimmer and complicated, the color processing really start to get funky at times. not something Nokia can't fix though but if that's the best they can do i must say the 808 isn't a "complete" revolution. the first thing when people look at the photo is the subject and closely followed by colors, then only start pixel peep... u can also boost contrast to make it look better...but for that pic it would've blown out some parts of the fish...which is why it needs time to do quite abit of individual selections which i wasnt bothered to do. here's what it would look like if did the above, can see parts of the fish got blown cos im lazy |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 5 2012, 03:37 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,242 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: From: |
QUOTE(Everdying @ Sep 5 2012, 03:14 PM) actually i didnt touch green...just boosted red abit. i appreciate you took the time and effort to demonstrate what you were doing. i strongly believe things can be done with detailed editing but as the very last part of your post suggested - much effort is needed to edit the colors, to me i might as well spend some money on a camera that capture everything properly right from the start to begin with. u can also boost contrast to make it look better...but for that pic it would've blown out some parts of the fish...which is why it needs time to do quite abit of individual selections which i wasnt bothered to do. here's what it would look like if did the above, can see parts of the fish got blown cos im lazy » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Sep 5 2012, 03:41 PM
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(little ice @ Sep 5 2012, 03:37 PM) i appreciate you took the time and effort to demonstrate what you were doing. i strongly believe things can be done with detailed editing but as the very last part of your post suggested - much effort is needed to edit the colors, to me i might as well spend some money on a camera that capture everything properly right from the start to begin with. no time use also, at most 1min depending on the situation, not many cameras can get it right, thats why proper lighting is used. anyway, spam more... ![]() |
|
|
Sep 5 2012, 04:04 PM
|
|
Elite
11,861 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Bangalasia |
|
|
|
Sep 5 2012, 04:09 PM
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 5 2012, 05:50 PM
|
|
Elite
11,861 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Bangalasia |
|
|
|
Sep 5 2012, 05:57 PM
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
oh that kinda stuff...mine is natural
|
|
|
Sep 5 2012, 07:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,372 posts Joined: May 2008 From: Nokia HQ |
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Sep 5 2012, 10:34 AM) forget who tell me before actually the trick of scaning fingerprint is the "time duration of putting your finger on screen" QUOTE(abafamny_90 @ Sep 5 2012, 10:38 AM) Ya agito is right. Do you seriously think your phone touch sensors are sensitive enough to detect the minute details of your thumbprint? |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 5 2012, 11:25 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
57 posts Joined: Jul 2012 |
|
|
|
Sep 5 2012, 11:27 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
666 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
8mp pureview..better put 8mp only..
|
|
|
Sep 5 2012, 11:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
35,468 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
QUOTE(eidda @ Sep 5 2012, 11:27 PM) i watching the live feed.Its actually quite amazing better low light performance, There this movable bearing lens something so in video recording it acts like a stablizer. They show S3 vs Lumia 920 video recording. The 920 less shake. And also a longer shutter allowing more light. In a way its better than 808 pureview 808 just got pawned in a way except for megapixels and lossless zoom I bet there are many unhappy Lumia 800 and 900 users This post has been edited by aspire2oo6: Sep 5 2012, 11:34 PM |
|
|
Sep 5 2012, 11:34 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
57 posts Joined: Jul 2012 |
8.7mp with dual LED. not xenon like 808
|
|
|
Sep 5 2012, 11:36 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,357 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Penang |
lol... puny 8MP...
Added on September 5, 2012, 11:37 pmwe don't want good... we want BEST!! lol Added on September 5, 2012, 11:39 pmsome more pity closing note seem more like begging note... Closing words from Elop. "Ladies and gentlemen it's time to switch to Lumia." (or i will lose my job) Added on September 5, 2012, 11:43 pmI bet there would be LOTS of freebies come along with the sale package as only minor new things within the L920... http://www.engadget.com/2012/09/05/lumia-9...-whats-changed/ This post has been edited by sklchan: Sep 5 2012, 11:43 PM |
|
|
Sep 5 2012, 11:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
666 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
QUOTE(aspire2oo6 @ Sep 5 2012, 11:29 PM) i watching the live feed. did u mean lumia 920 can take pic better than 808..Its actually quite amazing better low light performance, There this movable bearing lens something so in video recording it acts like a stablizer. They show S3 vs Lumia 920 video recording. The 920 less shake. And also a longer shutter allowing more light. In a way its better than 808 pureview 808 just got pawned in a way except for megapixels and lossless zoom I bet there are many unhappy Lumia 800 and 900 users got any link i can see example pic taken from lumia 920. |
|
|
Sep 5 2012, 11:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
35,468 posts Joined: Oct 2006 |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.1649sec
0.76
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 07:11 AM |