Has anyone tried old Nikkor manual lenses on D800? I' m particularly interested with 55mm f2.8 AiS since it's arguably one of the Nikkor's sharpest lenses.
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.15, Get your D800/D4 now !
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread Ver.15, Get your D800/D4 now !
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 07:33 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
14 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Sabah |
Has anyone tried old Nikkor manual lenses on D800? I' m particularly interested with 55mm f2.8 AiS since it's arguably one of the Nikkor's sharpest lenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 07:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 07:50 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
111 posts Joined: Apr 2011 |
|
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 08:00 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
384 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
Comparison of D800 & 5dmk3 from TheCameraStoreTv, much better analysis and more constructive than those crap from DigitalRev
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=omTo7UxbJX8...2ceFUAAAAAAABAA |
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 08:02 PM
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(raaisma @ Apr 3 2012, 07:33 PM) Has anyone tried old Nikkor manual lenses on D800? I' m particularly interested with 55mm f2.8 AiS since it's arguably one of the Nikkor's sharpest lenses. the macro one?dont see any reason why AiS lenses wont work, as it has been working on other bodies already. only question is whether it can resolve the high mp of the D800...guess u can be one of the first few to find out |
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 08:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
653 posts Joined: Aug 2010 |
lolz~ my lens got a bug~ dunno what is it.. dun have macro lens to take picture of it.. it's in between the glass i think. @_@
|
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 08:10 PM
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 08:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
653 posts Joined: Aug 2010 |
no idea how it entered the lens.. and yea.. it's inside the lens.. i shake the lens but it doesn't dislodge.. it's 2nd day since i noticed.. and the bug is still in same position.. presume dead.. but i can't be sure.. anybody with macro lens want TT? and let the rest of the nikon-ian members see? hhaha~ it's my samyang 85mm lens tho..
|
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 08:22 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
14 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: Sabah |
QUOTE(Everdying @ Apr 3 2012, 08:02 PM) the macro one? Yes, it should work. I was trying to ask how the lens fair on D800's high megapixel. I hope it can handle it dont see any reason why AiS lenses wont work, as it has been working on other bodies already. only question is whether it can resolve the high mp of the D800...guess u can be one of the first few to find out |
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 08:28 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
More pix...
![]() The 33rd Bangkok International Motor Show 2012 by CY Pixels, on Flickr ![]() The 33rd Bangkok International Motor Show 2012 by CY Pixels, on Flickr ![]() flickr CY7_6546 by CY Pixels, on Flickr |
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 08:34 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,786 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Kuala Terengganu |
@celciuz : nice photo bro
i think u put alot of effort on the smooth skin tone ya and ur picture damn sharp shooting at wide open This post has been edited by chongkiatz: Apr 3 2012, 08:35 PM |
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 08:39 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
384 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
QUOTE(celciuz @ Apr 3 2012, 08:28 PM) More pix... My ''Gender Detector'' software says those are male » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 08:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(makaroni @ Apr 3 2012, 07:50 PM) LR itself. Doesn't matter what I set in body since I'm shooting RAW.QUOTE(chongkiatz @ Apr 3 2012, 08:34 PM) @celciuz : nice photo bro Not really, they make up well! Save some work there i think u put alot of effort on the smooth skin tone ya and ur picture damn sharp shooting at wide open QUOTE(hkenh @ Apr 3 2012, 08:39 PM) |
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 08:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
384 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
none of those is wide open wor in the EXIF
|
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 09:02 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,308 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(Everdying @ Apr 3 2012, 03:00 PM) DFD pro with the diffuser in front? then 'almost' similar effect la almost similar? Not for my experience, I don't like the diffusion dome effect, it's much harsher and direct, plus it tends to darken the background. Shooting with same setting, the DFD Pro way better result from my experience, especially when you can adjust the diffuser and modify it to a bigger one.except u dont lose as much light as a diffusion dome. Added on April 3, 2012, 3:05 pmi have the DFD classic, tho most of the time i only use the diffusion dome that comes with the flash...unless i really really need to throw more light forward. but im also very lazy, and the dome is easier to setup For easier setup can purchase or DIY this: http://www.abetterbouncecard.com/ Only thing can't really adjust just DFD Pro. QUOTE(celciuz @ Apr 3 2012, 04:59 PM) I find the dome is no good for big open space. Maybe indoors small rooms still ok, but big halls such as the IMPACT Challenger its useless and wasting too much power, no point using. Might as well shoot without flash. I tried indoor small room or big room, didn't like the effect. One of the event, I saw 2 photographer, one of them using dome, flash slightly backwards instead of up or front, and another photographer using mixture of bounce and bounce card. SOOC, you can easily tell which is using the dome; In AWB, "generally", the dome will give cold tone, darker background and more hard lighting.QUOTE(Everdying @ Apr 3 2012, 05:03 PM) not really, the dome is still throwing some light forward. Depending on the environment, without flash and with flash (depending how it is used) can give really different outcome.plus ur only using 35mm, so ur not that far away anyway. if u notice alot of shots, its not just about the exposure, almost all will have some nice catch light in the eye, thats where a flash can come in handy. |
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 09:05 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
384 posts Joined: Jan 2011 |
|
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 09:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,062 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
celciuz, guess all were taken with d700? 35 f2.0?
|
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 09:08 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 09:11 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,062 posts Joined: Jan 2009 |
ahh forgot~! 1.4 is meant for full frame too! silly me ;D
|
|
|
Apr 3 2012, 09:20 PM
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Andy214 @ Apr 3 2012, 09:02 PM) almost similar? Not for my experience, I don't like the diffusion dome effect, it's much harsher and direct, plus it tends to darken the background. Shooting with same setting, the DFD Pro way better result from my experience, especially when you can adjust the diffuser and modify it to a bigger one. all depends how u angle the flash head with the diffusion dome on.For easier setup can purchase or DIY this: http://www.abetterbouncecard.com/ Only thing can't really adjust just DFD Pro. I tried indoor small room or big room, didn't like the effect. One of the event, I saw 2 photographer, one of them using dome, flash slightly backwards instead of up or front, and another photographer using mixture of bounce and bounce card. SOOC, you can easily tell which is using the dome; In AWB, "generally", the dome will give cold tone, darker background and more hard lighting. Depending on the environment, without flash and with flash (depending how it is used) can give really different outcome. and darken background? perhaps if the flash is set facing head on like direct flash. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.1004sec
0.68
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 01:40 AM |