QUOTE(patryn33 @ Nov 7 2012, 12:52 PM)
I wind my watches, attempt to be active may end up putting the shock mechanism into more action.
I only adjust it once a week if needed.
don't see why its a hassle to do it, I like to interact with my watches on a daily basis.
Added on November 7, 2012, 12:58 pmno. auto U will be winding more frequently and esp when its fully wound the clutch mechanism will keep kicking in. doesn't that cause more wear if U think about it? alot of tourbillion are manual wind, if its that bad why don't make it auto esp on those US$200k and up watches?
manual, depending on design. One will be pulling out the stem the wear is the gasket around the stem.
The clutch is inside the mainspring barrel that is well lubricated with grease and protected with a cover. It is just a piece of metal that will slip when the mainspring is fully wound either by the rotor (oscillating weight) or by the pinion of the winding stem. It will rarely give problems unless it has not been serviced and neglected for a very long time. Even so, only the worn mainspring barrel and the main spring will need to be changed. The pinion on the winding stem other hand has only tiny amount of grease. Neglected, it will wear out the mainplate, putting metal bits on the working parts of the movement and potentially create more damage and more expensive repairs.
Anyway the main reason IMO, tourbillion watches are hand wound are:
1. It will make watch thicker.
2. For aesthetic reasons. It will block the view of the moving parts of movement.
Piaget makes a self winding tourbillion with 10mm thickness but not attractive IMO.
Personally, I find it hard to fully wind 100% an automatic by wearing the watch. Perhaps I'm not active enough......
Anyway, I have a perfect watch for those who are hyperactive like an Energizer bunny on steroids for those capable of doing so.
This post has been edited by Catnip: Nov 11 2012, 04:11 PM