QUOTE(zachary22_77 @ Mar 21 2012, 05:49 PM)
Actually iOS will tombstone aka kill the app when non enough memory is available but the app will remain in the recent used list. Same with WP but WP have less memory to work with. Symbian will just close your app, no questions asked if it runs out of memory. I know coz I've seen it so many times on my phone.
Maemo/MeeGo doesn't close it, unfortunately it can result in complete lockup of the phone. This has happened to my N9 a couple of times when web browsing using stock browser & firefox.
WP didn't have recently used list right? Anyway, as previous I mentioned, it's not serious but will be a nice improvement feature; If somehow so happen you have writing a document or maybe SMS, and the app got close because you didn't notice there was already 5 apps running then it can be frustrating and not a nice experience.Maemo/MeeGo doesn't close it, unfortunately it can result in complete lockup of the phone. This has happened to my N9 a couple of times when web browsing using stock browser & firefox.
I'm not sure if it will kill the word app or SMS, as I notice, it won't kill off my IE no matter how many apps I open, it will close other app, IE will be in priority and will not be closed. So this can consider as a positive thing.
It will close Office app, but not sure if you have words/excel/powerpoint running, will it close, need to test it.
Yea, that's what I meant about Maemo/MeeGo, they have no limit, so the user needs to be educated and aware. One may argue this can cause problem... well, as I said before, software is flexible, they can actually add a option in settings, allow how many apps to run and what to do if user try to run more app, what to do when an app is not responding or consuming a lot of memory, and so on. They can set by default the recommended and the user can customize it... Software is all about how being creative and making it flexible.
QUOTE(zachary22_77 @ Mar 21 2012, 05:49 PM)
On 256mb device, basically if an app don't use more than 90mb then it can fast resume, any app using more will be tombstoned. Read that from MyNokiaBlog here.
Anyway, it's not that Nokia didn't want to put more RAM, but maybe it's a OS issue. Who knows. There's no WP phone on market with more than 512mb.
Added on March 21, 2012, 5:52 pm
Well, WP is a new OS, not based on Windows Mobile. So it's not about taking out bluetooth transfer. It never was in the OS, they have to add it in.
True, we don't know. Just saying that it'll be nice to have. There's no problem with 512MB, it's running smoothly and well, but it's just a "nice to have".Anyway, it's not that Nokia didn't want to put more RAM, but maybe it's a OS issue. Who knows. There's no WP phone on market with more than 512mb.
Added on March 21, 2012, 5:52 pm
Well, WP is a new OS, not based on Windows Mobile. So it's not about taking out bluetooth transfer. It never was in the OS, they have to add it in.
I know you've mentioned it's not based on Windows Mobile. As a smartphone OS, or experience they had, it's like a standard feature or common feature used by many. It's only thanks to Apple, they set new standards and people starts to try to follow it (I highly suspect the management just follow blindly because it's famous).
Many of the standard feature or commonly use, known feature, especially from their past experience, it "should" be there, moreover as a smartphone. Not providing them just basically means the same, and it will "affect" many users, especially their previous Windows Mobile users, and now partnership with Nokia, the Symbian users.
It's a simple thing, and it should be added in and imagine this:
If Windows Phone OS have all these "basic" commonly used and "sort of" standard feature; What do you think Windows Phone will be today?
1. We won't be having these discussion on the restriction and limitation.
2. Symbian users have smoother and less problem in transition/change.
3. Less complains from users, good for both Nokia and Microsoft.
Take note, I didn't say none, but less; There won't be a perfect device, sure will have customer that dislike or doesn't suit, but the key point here is, to cater for more customer and reduce the complains, more satisfied customers; which in current case, I've repeated many times, is easily solved, but it's just a mere "management decisions".
Added on March 21, 2012, 6:32 pm
QUOTE(zachary22_77 @ Mar 21 2012, 06:18 PM)
Yeah correct. And Rita will hold no punches if a product deserves to be put down, just wait for her full review. I can honestly tell you, it might turn 180 degrees around from this initial impression, depending how annoyed she gets.
Not sure what she will write, but in my opinion, there's no need to ditch a product; Reviewers should highlight the "drawbacks" of the device and help to "raise awareness" to the manufacturer in CONSTRUCTIVE ways. Let them how what is the impact, the severity and how it can be easily solved or avoided.Some people may look at what I write as a negative point, but if they read carefully, I'm trying to convey it constructively, I give scenario and stories, examples, to show how it will affect some people and so on. There's no perfect device, but to make a better device, the users need to feedback on what are the bads and try to get it resolved.
If we ignore or say, it's ok, not so serious for us, then how will we expect the things to change and improve for the better. I mean, everyone wants a better improved OS right? Or do they?
This post has been edited by Andy214: Mar 21 2012, 06:32 PM
Mar 21 2012, 06:26 PM

Quote
0.0182sec
0.46
6 queries
GZIP Disabled