QUOTE(dvlzplayground @ Jan 19 2013, 08:30 PM)
1. if light weight then look at micro four thirds (i assume this is what u meant. four thirds is different) or sony NEX system.
2. biggest difference is the sensor size. normal compact camera are the smallest. m4/3 slightly bigger, "crop sensor" DSLR and sony NEX bigger, then you have "full frame" expensive DSLR sensor.
3. they both start at about the same price, but DSLR can go up to higher price ranges
4. im not certain but i guess m4/3 lens should be cheaper since they're smaller
5. quality and performance of course DSLR is better.
do look at Sony NEX-F3. small size and quality got fight with entry level DSLR. i think it suits ur purpose very well
i suggest an entry level DSLR with a 50mm f/1.8 lens. for rm2000 that might be challenging unless you're okay with 2nd hand stuff.
alternatively i'd suggest a good compact camera with a big sensor. sony RX100!
thanks for your suggestion! How about NEX series? it seems a little bit cheaper. is it true? please advise2. biggest difference is the sensor size. normal compact camera are the smallest. m4/3 slightly bigger, "crop sensor" DSLR and sony NEX bigger, then you have "full frame" expensive DSLR sensor.
3. they both start at about the same price, but DSLR can go up to higher price ranges
4. im not certain but i guess m4/3 lens should be cheaper since they're smaller
5. quality and performance of course DSLR is better.
do look at Sony NEX-F3. small size and quality got fight with entry level DSLR. i think it suits ur purpose very well
i suggest an entry level DSLR with a 50mm f/1.8 lens. for rm2000 that might be challenging unless you're okay with 2nd hand stuff.
alternatively i'd suggest a good compact camera with a big sensor. sony RX100!
Jan 19 2013, 10:05 PM

Quote
0.0971sec
0.56
6 queries
GZIP Disabled