so, buy backpack that can make you so called mobile-fridge-backpack
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread V13 !, Le D4 is awaiting you @ 6000 bucks only
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion Thread V13 !, Le D4 is awaiting you @ 6000 bucks only
|
|
Nov 23 2011, 09:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,682 posts Joined: Jan 2007 From: Kuala Lumpur |
nahh..just for fun put the egg to show how large my backpack
so, buy backpack that can make you so called mobile-fridge-backpack |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 23 2011, 09:37 PM
|
|
Elite
11,861 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Bangalasia |
|
|
|
Nov 24 2011, 12:07 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
214 posts Joined: Sep 2011 |
QUOTE(pziv2 @ Nov 23 2011, 10:00 PM) quite good, but make sure you have enough light, else you need to use flash, very high ISO.a tripod will definitely help, i have the shutter at continues to capture the moments. it is advise not to zoom at max when capturing shots, for me mostly i would stop at 180-190mm |
|
|
Nov 24 2011, 11:48 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,447 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
Hey guys! Anyone personally own a 14-24 f2.8 and a 16-35 f4 could comment which lens is more worth it?
I was actually leaning towards to 16-35 because I have a polarizing filter for it and many says it is as sharp as the 14-24, until i went to photozone.de and saw the MTF chart and it really changed my mind, so i was wondering which is much more worth it and the 16-35 is a tad cheaper too! |
|
|
Nov 24 2011, 12:05 PM
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(Calvin Seak @ Nov 24 2011, 11:48 AM) Hey guys! Anyone personally own a 14-24 f2.8 and a 16-35 f4 could comment which lens is more worth it? both are obviously different lenses.I was actually leaning towards to 16-35 because I have a polarizing filter for it and many says it is as sharp as the 14-24, until i went to photozone.de and saw the MTF chart and it really changed my mind, so i was wondering which is much more worth it and the 16-35 is a tad cheaper too! buy what u need. do u need wider angle? slightly longer reach? VR? bigger aperture? if just for sharpness, must as well just go buy 24mm f/1.4G Added on November 24, 2011, 12:08 pmanyway, ken crockwell chooses 14-24 over 16-35... This post has been edited by Everdying: Nov 24 2011, 12:08 PM |
|
|
Nov 24 2011, 12:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,242 posts Joined: Jul 2007 From: JAVABUS |
14-24 vs 16-35
16-35 is more versatile for press, you can put UV filter for protection. shooting static VR will comes in handy anytime than f/2.8 If you want the extra 2mm on the other hand often, I guess you gotta get it. Though 16mm is crazy wide enough |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 24 2011, 12:58 PM
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
16-35 is wide but lots of distortion.
btw, got consider the 17-35? |
|
|
Nov 24 2011, 01:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,447 posts Joined: Oct 2008 |
QUOTE(Everdying @ Nov 24 2011, 12:58 PM) Haha currently reading this review http://www.luminescentphoto.com/blog/2010/...om-nikkor-lens/ thanks for input! Added on November 24, 2011, 1:25 pm QUOTE(0168257061 @ Nov 24 2011, 12:50 PM) 14-24 vs 16-35 Thank you still deciding =p yea.. i bought a cpl so that i could use it on my wide angles.. T_T16-35 is more versatile for press, you can put UV filter for protection. shooting static VR will comes in handy anytime than f/2.8 If you want the extra 2mm on the other hand often, I guess you gotta get it. Though 16mm is crazy wide enough This post has been edited by Calvin Seak: Nov 24 2011, 01:25 PM |
|
|
Nov 24 2011, 01:32 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,496 posts Joined: Nov 2006 |
QUOTE(tatagal @ Nov 23 2011, 10:31 AM) Even I took photos at the beach under sunlight, if I turn on the flash, I noticed the colour will be slightly warmer but not as terrible as the test I mentioned above! Since I am beginner here, using M mode playing with the shutter speed and aperture already keep me busy! It will be abit challenging for me to change the WB and selecting the correct ISO for every shot I take(turning off the ISO sensitivity) QUOTE(Calvin Seak @ Nov 24 2011, 11:48 AM) Hey guys! Anyone personally own a 14-24 f2.8 and a 16-35 f4 could comment which lens is more worth it? From what I can tell the things you mentioned above, your choice would be towards the 16-35mm f/4 VR. If you're just taking landscape pictures and not so much for architechture where straight lines must be straight, I was actually leaning towards to 16-35 because I have a polarizing filter for it and many says it is as sharp as the 14-24, until i went to photozone.de and saw the MTF chart and it really changed my mind, so i was wondering which is much more worth it and the 16-35 is a tad cheaper too! QUOTE(pziv2 @ Nov 23 2011, 09:00 PM) How does the lens fare if shooting those school performances? (Dances, silat performances, etc) Very hard to say... Should be better than your average PnS cameras.I take it that those performances would be held indoors? That would mean low light. For low light, you need large aperture lenses like the f/2.8. Even then, sometimes it's not enough and you need to rely on camera's high ISO. I don't know if f/5.6 on the lens is going to cut it. When you want to freeze the motion of the subject etc, you need faster shutter speed. This is where big aperture and good high ISO cameras are useful. QUOTE(0168257061 @ Nov 24 2011, 12:50 PM) 14-24 vs 16-35 If you're in the press, you would not care too much for protection. Insurance covers it.16-35 is more versatile for press, you can put UV filter for protection. shooting static VR will comes in handy anytime than f/2.8 If you want the extra 2mm on the other hand often, I guess you gotta get it. Though 16mm is crazy wide enough QUOTE(Everdying @ Nov 24 2011, 12:58 PM) 16-35 is wide but lots of distortion. The 17-35mm f/2.8 is still a nice lens. But sharpness wise, it's still behind the 16-35mm f/4 VR while the 14-24mm f/2.8 is still king.btw, got consider the 17-35? I think you can only get the 17-35mm f/2.8 as 2nd hand. Yes, you will need to find a good copy because there are a lot of people complaining about the AF-S motor failing. If I'm not wrong, this lens was one of the first lenses to have the AF-S motor in it (perhaps it could be the 300mm f/4 or the 28-70mm f/2.8). |
|
|
Nov 24 2011, 01:39 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
551 posts Joined: Nov 2009 |
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Nov 24 2011, 01:32 PM) Very hard to say... Should be better than your average PnS cameras. I know, I have a Tam1750 2.8, D3100 and Di622 myself. I was asking about the autofocus performance of the lens, but then i wasn't specific enough hahaI take it that those performances would be held indoors? That would mean low light. For low light, you need large aperture lenses like the f/2.8. Even then, sometimes it's not enough and you need to rely on camera's high ISO. I don't know if f/5.6 on the lens is going to cut it. When you want to freeze the motion of the subject etc, you need faster shutter speed. This is where big aperture and good high ISO cameras are useful. my Tam focuses a bit too slow, and was hoping that the 55-200 would focus better. performances are held outdoors, (mostly). if the 55-200 focuses too slowly, i think i'll have to expend more to get tamron's 70-300 or sigma's 70-200 This post has been edited by pziv2: Nov 24 2011, 01:42 PM |
|
|
Nov 24 2011, 02:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,082 posts Joined: Aug 2009 From: Malaysia |
My cheapo UD70 has reached
|
|
|
Nov 24 2011, 02:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,284 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Hong Kong / Malaysia |
Lowepro Fastpack 350
http://products.lowepro.com/product/Fastpack-350,2087,14.htm vs Lowepro Flipside AW400 http://products.lowepro.com/product/Flipsi...-AW,2116,14.htm vs Vanguard Up-Rise 48 http://www.vanguardworld.com/index.php/en/...l-1-1-4-34.html Mana satu? For all in one, camera + laptop bag that can fit 70-200 |
|
|
Nov 24 2011, 02:22 PM
|
|
Elite
11,861 posts Joined: Oct 2008 From: Bangalasia |
QUOTE(vearn27 @ Nov 24 2011, 02:18 PM) Lowepro Fastpack 350 i like flipside AW 400 exterior..interior i duno.... i waiting lowepro pro messenger series release http://products.lowepro.com/product/Fastpack-350,2087,14.htm vs Lowepro Flipside AW400 http://products.lowepro.com/product/Flipsi...-AW,2116,14.htm vs Vanguard Up-Rise 48 http://www.vanguardworld.com/index.php/en/...l-1-1-4-34.html Mana satu? For all in one, camera + laptop bag that can fit 70-200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 24 2011, 02:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,335 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
the shop i usually go juz quoted me Sandisk extreme (60mb/s) 16GB CF card for RM300
price is OK?... he also told me that prices will go up every high starting next month... due to Thailand flood??? |
|
|
Nov 24 2011, 02:39 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,284 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Hong Kong / Malaysia |
QUOTE(seather @ Nov 24 2011, 02:35 PM) the shop i usually go juz quoted me Sandisk extreme (60mb/s) 16GB CF card for RM300 Thailand flood shouldn't affect memory cards, that's what I have been told by my supplier. The memory card price in M'sia will be affected by the USD rates.price is OK?... he also told me that prices will go up every high starting next month... due to Thailand flood??? If you buying the new stock of SanDisk Extreme memory card 16GB and above, you'll get a free camera wrap |
|
|
Nov 24 2011, 02:53 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,335 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
QUOTE(vearn27 @ Nov 24 2011, 02:39 PM) Thailand flood shouldn't affect memory cards, that's what I have been told by my supplier. The memory card price in M'sia will be affected by the USD rates. icic... i think he wanna pressure me to do a quick sales If you buying the new stock of SanDisk Extreme memory card 16GB and above, you'll get a free camera wrap but the USD went up in the last 2 weeks... maybe he talking about that... i don think i will get the camera wrap since he say it is old stock.. new stock wif higher price coming in next month btw.. it is black friday 2moro |
|
|
Nov 24 2011, 02:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
330 posts Joined: Sep 2007 From: East, KL |
USD went up pretty fast. Different rate being charged to my cards. Hope for some great deals during black friday n thanksgiving sales.
|
|
|
Nov 24 2011, 05:50 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004 |
|
|
|
Nov 24 2011, 06:54 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
214 posts Joined: Sep 2011 |
|
|
|
Nov 24 2011, 07:04 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,538 posts Joined: Jul 2006 |
![]() Got this keychain together with my bag, not sure it come along with the bag or what, yamiya didnt state that there is one key chain there. Below are some picture of the bag(please ignore the blur image, shaky hand + lousy light » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « The bag is quite big for me(or mayb for now). As u can c that there is only 2 compartment for now, i use the left compartment to place my D90 + 35mm and right compartment is flash, book, wallet, and some biscuit. For those ppl need many compartment, this bag is definitely not suite them because the velcro only till the place in the pic, u can move it further right but not too much. The bag only got 2 divider and one of it was left unattached(which i didnt use it for now). The front pocket i just put in some pen as backup, it only have 3 slot for pen, 3 pocket and 1 pocket for the Manfrotto MP3-D01 (Pocket Support Large Black) Mini Tripod. As for the tripod compartment, i use it to put water bottle, i can put 1x500ml mountain dew and 1x600ml normal water bottle in it, still left some place in there. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0306sec
0.57
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 11th December 2025 - 10:35 PM |