Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

176 Pages « < 117 118 119 120 121 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Enterprise Networking Mikrotik Routers (RouterBoard & RouterOS), User and owner discussion group

views
     
Anime4000
post Oct 31 2021, 06:58 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,400 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
From: /dev/null


QUOTE(Gaara92 @ Oct 29 2021, 09:20 PM)
Just bought the GPON on your link haha. Sebelum ni tak sempat beli, nanti nak follow guide flashing kat github.
*
Try get 10G SFP like RB4011 / RB5009, it seem can force 2.5Gbps

you can explore TM OLT from SFP:
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image
Attached Image

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

thankyou
post Nov 1 2021, 12:45 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,941 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(asellus @ Oct 29 2021, 09:12 PM)
So that WAN network doesn't have to waste CPU-switch 10Gbps link capacity. With RB4011, I put WAN interface on the SFP+ cage, and all Internet traffic has its own dedicated lane to the CPU (for routing et. al), before going to the two port-multipliers through their own dedicated 2.5Gb links. For RB5009, no matter if you use 2.5Gb port or the SFP+ for WAN interface, all raw Internet traffic will go through the 10Gbps link first for routing or other things before going through the 10Gbps link again to the switches.
*
I can't see the dedicated full-duplex 10Gbps Switch<->CPU has disadvantages on RB5011.

RB4011 block diagram consists of 2.5 + 2.5 + 10Gbps connecting to CPU so technically it's only 5 Gbps max transfer speed provided you are transferring from SFP+ -> SW1 (2.5Gbps) + SW2 (2.5Gbps)...

assuming SFP+ is used for WAN, you'll be using 1Gbps at max... With SFP+ transfer at full 1Gbps speed, still... you have a spare 9Gbps compare to 2.5+2.5 in RB4011.

I personally think RB5011 have a better network flow.

This post has been edited by thankyou: Nov 1 2021, 12:49 AM
Gaara92
post Nov 1 2021, 11:49 PM

Herald
****
Junior Member
612 posts

Joined: Mar 2008


QUOTE(thankyou @ Nov 1 2021, 12:45 AM)
I can't see the dedicated full-duplex 10Gbps Switch<->CPU has disadvantages on RB5011.

RB4011 block diagram consists of 2.5 + 2.5 + 10Gbps connecting to CPU so technically it's only 5 Gbps max transfer speed provided you are transferring from SFP+ -> SW1 (2.5Gbps) + SW2 (2.5Gbps)...

assuming SFP+ is used for WAN, you'll be using 1Gbps at max... With SFP+ transfer at full 1Gbps speed, still... you have a spare 9Gbps compare to 2.5+2.5 in RB4011.

I personally think RB5011 have a better network flow.
*
You mean RB5009, there is no RB5011 haha. Anyhow the chart showing that packets flow is more promising on the latest RB5009
thankyou
post Nov 2 2021, 12:39 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,941 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Gaara92 @ Nov 1 2021, 11:49 PM)
You mean RB5009, there is no RB5011 haha. Anyhow the chart showing that packets flow is more promising on the latest RB5009
*
Oh yea! thank you for the correction!
wong_86
post Nov 2 2021, 03:13 PM

DUDE
****
Junior Member
565 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: MARS


anyone can guide how to make setup pihole as DNS server in mikrotik device ?
go626201
post Nov 2 2021, 04:00 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,882 posts

Joined: Sep 2017
QUOTE(wong_86 @ Nov 2 2021, 03:13 PM)
anyone can guide how to make setup pihole as DNS server in mikrotik device ?
*
U mean u want to change the DHCP DNS setting or setup the pihole DNS service on Mikrotik router?
wong_86
post Nov 2 2021, 04:22 PM

DUDE
****
Junior Member
565 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: MARS


QUOTE(go626201 @ Nov 2 2021, 04:00 PM)
U mean u want to change the DHCP DNS setting or setup the pihole DNS service on Mikrotik router?
*
I already set pihole IP in DHCP server but unable to resolve address, i stuck in firewall there, try route all DNS service to Pihole to resolve.

This post has been edited by wong_86: Nov 2 2021, 04:22 PM
Gaara92
post Nov 2 2021, 04:27 PM

Herald
****
Junior Member
612 posts

Joined: Mar 2008


QUOTE(wong_86 @ Nov 2 2021, 04:22 PM)
I already set pihole IP in DHCP server but unable to resolve address, i stuck in firewall there, try route all DNS service to Pihole to resolve.
*
try exporting your firewall configuration and paste it here. Use this command on mikrotik terminal

CODE
/ip firewall filter export hide-sensitive

CODE
/ip firewall nat export hide-sensitive

wong_86
post Nov 2 2021, 04:42 PM

DUDE
****
Junior Member
565 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: MARS


QUOTE(Gaara92 @ Nov 2 2021, 04:27 PM)
try exporting your firewall configuration and paste it here. Use this command on mikrotik terminal

CODE
/ip firewall filter export hide-sensitive

CODE
/ip firewall nat export hide-sensitive

*
CODE
[admin@MikroTik] > /ip firewall filter export hide-sensitive
# nov/02/2021 14:45:25 by RouterOS 6.49
# software id = 17RT-CD2Q
#
# model = RBD52G-5HacD2HnD
# serial number =
/ip firewall filter
add action=accept chain=input comment=\
   "defconf: accept established,related,untracked" connection-state=\
   established,related,untracked
add action=drop chain=input comment="defconf: drop invalid" connection-state=\
   invalid
add action=accept chain=input comment="defconf: accept ICMP" protocol=icmp
add action=accept chain=input comment=\
   "defconf: accept to local loopback (for CAPsMAN)" dst-address=127.0.0.1
add action=drop chain=input comment="defconf: drop all not coming from LAN" \
   in-interface-list=!LAN
add action=accept chain=forward comment="defconf: accept in ipsec policy" \
   ipsec-policy=in,ipsec
add action=accept chain=forward comment="defconf: accept out ipsec policy" \
   ipsec-policy=out,ipsec
add action=fasttrack-connection chain=forward comment="defconf: fasttrack" \
   connection-state=established,related
add action=accept chain=forward comment=\
   "defconf: accept established,related, untracked" connection-state=\
   established,related,untracked
add action=drop chain=forward comment="defconf: drop invalid" connection-state=\
   invalid
add action=drop chain=forward comment="defconf: drop all from WAN not DSTNATed" \
   connection-nat-state=!dstnat connection-state=new in-interface-list=WAN


CODE
/ip firewall nat
# no interface
add action=masquerade chain=srcnat comment="defconf: masquerade" ipsec-policy=out,none out-interface=Unifi
add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat dst-address=!192.168.88.253 dst-port=53 protocol=udp src-address=!192.168.88.253 to-addresses=192.168.88.253
add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat dst-address=!192.168.88.253 dst-port=53 protocol=tcp src-address=!192.168.88.253 to-addresses=192.168.88.253
add action=masquerade chain=srcnat dst-address=192.168.88.253 dst-port=53 protocol=udp src-address=192.168.88.0/24
add action=masquerade chain=srcnat dst-address=192.168.88.253 dst-port=53 protocol=tcp src-address=192.168.88.0/24


192.168.88.253 is Pihole IP

This post has been edited by wong_86: Nov 2 2021, 04:44 PM
Gaara92
post Nov 2 2021, 05:39 PM

Herald
****
Junior Member
612 posts

Joined: Mar 2008


CODE
add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat dst-address=!192.168.88.253 dst-port=53 protocol=udp src-address=!192.168.88.253 to-addresses=192.168.88.253
add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat dst-address=!192.168.88.253 dst-port=53 protocol=tcp src-address=!192.168.88.253 to-addresses=192.168.88.253
add action=masquerade chain=srcnat dst-address=192.168.88.253 dst-port=53 protocol=udp src-address=192.168.88.0/24
add action=masquerade chain=srcnat dst-address=192.168.88.253 dst-port=53 protocol=tcp src-address=192.168.88.0/24


these 4 lines change it to:

CODE
add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat dst-port=53 protocol=udp src-address=!192.168.88.253 to-addresses=192.168.88.253 to-ports=53
add action=dst-nat chain=dstnat dst-port=53 protocol=tcp src-address=!192.168.88.253 to-addresses=192.168.88.253 to-ports=53
add action=masquerade chain=srcnat dst-address=192.168.88.253 dst-port=53 protocol=udp src-address=!192.168.88.253
add action=masquerade chain=srcnat dst-address=192.168.88.253 dst-port=53 protocol=tcp src-address=!192.168.88.253


Your dst-nat dont need to put dst address, just needed the source and to-address.

This post has been edited by Gaara92: Nov 2 2021, 05:45 PM
syahpian
post Nov 4 2021, 05:59 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
818 posts

Joined: Jul 2008
From: Kota Kinabalu <-> Kuala Lumpur


anyone know where i can buy touch screen replacement for rb2011UiAS-2HnD-IN locally?

loonsave
post Nov 5 2021, 04:56 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,635 posts

Joined: May 2005


Hi Sifu, I used to use pfsense for more that 10 years. But I am going to turn off my VM to reduce energy usage.
Please recommend me an entry-level of Mikrotik router to achieve function below. I am subscribing to 300Mbps Tm UniFi.

1. Site-to-Site VPN to Surfshark with destination route for certain websites via the VPN tunnel.
2. Road warrior VPN, prefer OpenVPN/Wireguard.
3. Block access to certain websites at certain hour.
4. Working well with TP-Link Deco X20 AP Mode.
5. VLAN separation for IoT/Security devices.

Thank you. notworthy.gif
go626201
post Nov 5 2021, 05:33 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,882 posts

Joined: Sep 2017
QUOTE(loonsave @ Nov 5 2021, 04:56 PM)
Hi Sifu, I used to use pfsense for more that 10 years. But I am going to turn off my VM to reduce energy usage.
Please recommend me an entry-level of Mikrotik router to achieve function below. I am subscribing to 300Mbps Tm UniFi.

1. Site-to-Site VPN to Surfshark with destination route for certain websites via the VPN tunnel.
2. Road warrior VPN, prefer OpenVPN/Wireguard.
3. Block access to certain websites at certain hour.
4. Working well with TP-Link Deco X20 AP Mode.
5. VLAN separation for IoT/Security devices.

Thank you.  notworthy.gif
*
hAP ac2 (Disable Wifi function) should be enough for your usage. (hEX should also suitable but CPU will be a bit weaker)
loonsave
post Nov 6 2021, 10:22 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,635 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(go626201 @ Nov 5 2021, 05:33 PM)
hAP ac2 (Disable Wifi function) should be enough for your usage. (hEX should also suitable but CPU will be a bit weaker)
*
Thank you. I will have a look at the recommended model.
Gaara92
post Nov 6 2021, 10:52 PM

Herald
****
Junior Member
612 posts

Joined: Mar 2008


QUOTE(loonsave @ Nov 5 2021, 04:56 PM)
Hi Sifu, I used to use pfsense for more that 10 years. But I am going to turn off my VM to reduce energy usage.
Please recommend me an entry-level of Mikrotik router to achieve function below. I am subscribing to 300Mbps Tm UniFi.

1. Site-to-Site VPN to Surfshark with destination route for certain websites via the VPN tunnel.
2. Road warrior VPN, prefer OpenVPN/Wireguard.
3. Block access to certain websites at certain hour.
4. Working well with TP-Link Deco X20 AP Mode.
5. VLAN separation for IoT/Security devices.

Thank you.  notworthy.gif
*
What is your budget? If below rm1k then get the latest new model RB5009 equipped with 10Gbps SFP+ FTW. Otherwise you can get a hEX S, or hAP ac2 or hAP ac3. But it would be a waste since you already got your own Deco AP, get an RB5009 instead it is using native RouterOS v7 already and support WireGuard and ZeroTier also! drool.gif
go626201
post Nov 6 2021, 11:22 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,882 posts

Joined: Sep 2017
QUOTE(Gaara92 @ Nov 6 2021, 10:52 PM)
What is your budget? If below rm1k then get the latest new model RB5009 equipped with 10Gbps SFP+ FTW. Otherwise you can get a hEX S, or hAP ac2 or hAP ac3. But it would be a waste since you already got your own Deco AP, get an RB5009 instead it is using native RouterOS v7 already and support WireGuard and ZeroTier also! drool.gif
*
Currently ROS7 still at beta stage... IPv6- DHCPv6 PD not working for Unifi. Better wait for 6month later to get ROS7 only device...
So i suggest in current state and for his requirements just get a device that cost about RM300 is enough for now since it is his first time to join Mikrotik.
Gaara92
post Nov 7 2021, 12:15 AM

Herald
****
Junior Member
612 posts

Joined: Mar 2008


QUOTE(go626201 @ Nov 6 2021, 11:22 PM)
Currently ROS7 still at beta stage... IPv6- DHCPv6 PD not working for Unifi. Better wait for 6month later to get ROS7 only device...
So i suggest in current state and for his requirements just get a device that cost about RM300 is enough for now since it is his first time to join Mikrotik.
*
Why would you use DHCPv6? Isn't unifi provide IPv6 using stateless SLAAC mode?
go626201
post Nov 7 2021, 12:49 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,882 posts

Joined: Sep 2017
QUOTE(Gaara92 @ Nov 7 2021, 12:15 AM)
Why would you use DHCPv6? Isn't unifi provide IPv6 using stateless SLAAC mode?
*
Emm actually i not sure,i just follow soonwai 's tutorial to use IPv6 on ROS6,but currently the same way on ROS7 is not working,waiting Mikrotik to fix it.
loonsave
post Nov 7 2021, 11:47 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,635 posts

Joined: May 2005


QUOTE(Gaara92 @ Nov 6 2021, 10:52 PM)
What is your budget? If below rm1k then get the latest new model RB5009 equipped with 10Gbps SFP+ FTW. Otherwise you can get a hEX S, or hAP ac2 or hAP ac3. But it would be a waste since you already got your own Deco AP, get an RB5009 instead it is using native RouterOS v7 already and support WireGuard and ZeroTier also! drool.gif
*
My budget below RM400. I will check hAP ac2/ac3.
Thank you.
soonwai
post Nov 7 2021, 12:38 PM


********
All Stars
11,459 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: KL


QUOTE(go626201 @ Nov 7 2021, 12:49 AM)
Emm actually i not sure,i just follow soonwai 's tutorial to use IPv6 on ROS6,but currently the same way on ROS7 is not working,waiting Mikrotik to fix it.
*
Getting RB5009 soon. Later I check how to configure IPv6 or why it doesn’t work. I also follow the guides previously posted.

176 Pages « < 117 118 119 120 121 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0201sec    0.81    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 07:38 PM