Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

176 Pages « < 102 103 104 105 106 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Enterprise Networking Mikrotik Routers (RouterBoard & RouterOS), User and owner discussion group

views
     
heidarren
post Aug 31 2019, 08:07 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
248 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(Garena @ Aug 31 2019, 06:34 PM)
Lol that 4x4 MIMO is for cellular. I can still remember the model number because last year i read some articles about the superiority of Qualcomm modem vs underdog Intel modem. Intel XMM 7560 is the model number for the 2018 iPhones, please do not confuse cellular MIMO with Wi-Fi MIMO laugh.gif

Both iPhone 7 and 7 Plus (2016) and iPhone 8 and 8 Plus (2017) use a mixed of Qualcomm and Intel modem. iPhone Xs, Xs Max, Xr (2018) all use Intel modem. Legal battle between Qualcomm vs Intel.
*
Yup, 4x4 MIMO is cellular modem, Wi-Fi is actually 2x2 MIMO, and no MU-MIMO supported.

And many people think that Wi-Fi is bad on current iPhones like XS/Max/XR is due to Intel chipset, but actually Intel has nothing to do with Wi-Fi in iPhones, they used Murata Wi-Fi module, Apple is using Wi-Fi module from them since iphone 4 or even earlier.
Garena
post Aug 31 2019, 11:07 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
446 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(heidarren @ Aug 31 2019, 07:56 PM)
Bro, calm down. ofcoz we know that the 40MHz is working, and the registration table is showing the correct rate, what I mean is in real world, those 20MHz and 40MHz clients will use the WiFi simultaneously right? So do a speed test WITH both of them connected and do the speed test on the 40MHz client and use the 20MHz client to do some web browsing at the same time, u will see the speed drops significantly.

Also, go YouTube and watch the MUM especially those topic like “wireless” “top ten common mistake in MikroTik”, all of them are saying this. If we can easily get a double of speed by just a single click, why wouldn’t we? Simple enough right? Just a click, double speed. But why most of us r saying the same thing? Must be a reason
*
QUOTE(heidarren @ Aug 30 2019, 11:56 PM)
As for 40MHz, unless every devices in 2.4GHz are using 40MHz, if anyone of them only uses 20MHz, everyone will drop to 20MHz, but still broadcasting 40MHz to create interference to interrupt your neighbor.
*
But what you said earlier "everyone will drop to 20 MHz" is not true. I've done the speed test with devices connected to the wireless router at the same time, not one at a time. Clearly the 40 MHz is working and laptop that support 40 MHz does see increase in speed compared to 20 MHz.

This post has been edited by Garena: Sep 1 2019, 12:02 AM
Garena
post Aug 31 2019, 11:15 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
446 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(heidarren @ Aug 31 2019, 08:07 PM)
Yup, 4x4 MIMO is cellular modem, Wi-Fi is actually 2x2 MIMO, and no MU-MIMO supported.

And many people think that Wi-Fi is bad on current iPhones like XS/Max/XR is due to Intel chipset, but actually Intel has nothing to do with Wi-Fi in iPhones, they used Murata Wi-Fi module, Apple is using Wi-Fi module from them since iphone 4 or even earlier.
*
Incorrect, iPhone Xs, Xs Max, Xr all does support 2x2 MU-MIMO. In fact since year 2016 flagship smartphones like Galaxy S7, Galaxy Note 7 (boom), Galaxy S8, S8 Plus, iPhone 8, 8 Plus, X to name a few all support MU-MIMO (802.11ac Wave 2 standard) already.

Yes, Intel had nothing to do with Wi-Fi in iPhone but Murata is just the manufacturer for the Wi-Fi module. The Broadcom Wi-Fi chip which laid underneath the silicon module is the brain that powers the Wi-Fi. Apple has a long relationship with Broadcom and have been using their Wi-Fi + Bluetooth combo chip for many years. On the other hand for Samsung, they have been jumping from Broadcom and Qualcomm Wi-Fi chip (refer image below) but in recent years they prefer to stick with Broadcom. In fact their flagship S series and Note series mostly all powered by Broadcom chip.

Samsung has their own manufacturing arm for Wi-Fi module called Samsung Electro-Mechanics, so of course they won't be using Murata Manufacturing.

Broadcom has been the hegemon of Wi-Fi chip and currently dominating the wireless market but Qualcomm has been stepping up to disrupt the market ever since they acquired Atheros in 2011.

Source: http://www.samsungsem.com/global/product/m...odule/index.jsp

user posted image

This post has been edited by Garena: Jan 7 2020, 07:21 PM
heidarren
post Sep 1 2019, 02:49 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
248 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(Garena @ Aug 31 2019, 11:07 PM)
But what you said earlier "everyone will drop to 20 MHz" is not true. I've done the speed test with devices connected to the wireless router at the same time, not one at a time. Clearly the 40 MHz is working and laptop that support 40 MHz does see increase in speed compared to 20 MHz.
*
👍

heidarren
post Sep 1 2019, 10:00 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
248 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
QUOTE(Garena @ Aug 31 2019, 11:15 PM)
Incorrect, iPhone Xs, Xs Max, Xr all does support 2x2 MU-MIMO. In fact since year 2016 flagship smartphones like Galaxy S7, Galaxy Note 7 (boom), Galaxy S8, S8 Plus, iPhone 8, 8 Plus, X to name a few all support MU-MIMO (802.11ac Wave 2 standard) already.

Yes, Intel had nothing to do with Wi-Fi in iPhone but Murata is just the manufacturer for the Wi-Fi module. The Broadcom Wi-Fi chip is that laid underneath the silicon module is the brain and it powers the Wi-Fi. Apple has a long relationship with Broadcom already. For Samsung on the other hand, they have been jumping from Broadcom and Qualcomm Wi-Fi chip (refer image below) but in recent years they prefer to stick with Broadcom. In fact their flagship S series and Note series mostly all powered by Broadcom chip.

Samsung has their own manufacturing arm for Wi-Fi module called Samsung Electro-Mechanics, so of course they won't be using Murata Manufacturing.

Broadcom has been the hegemon of Wi-Fi chip and currently dominating the wireless market but Qualcomm has been stepping up to disrupt the market ever since they acquired Atheros in 2011.

user posted image
*
I hope you really know what you are saying, give you a key word, "hardware supported doesn't mean software supported"

thongjj2 P
post Sep 1 2019, 08:03 PM

New Member
*
Probation
2 posts

Joined: Sep 2019
Guys, I need some sifu to help me setup my Time Fiber on my RB4011AHX4, previously I've been using this router for Maxis using vlan 621. Trying to setup by myself but no luck on getting everything smooth and running. Searching over google with the only one guide to follow but still cannot, only managed to get to a few website and cant even ping to google dns. Speedtest.com keep having latency error. Plugged in back to the dir 882 everythings works fine. Are there any guide I missed in the wild or in lowyat forum I can make use of? smile.gif
soonwai
post Sep 1 2019, 10:26 PM


********
All Stars
11,459 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: KL


QUOTE(thongjj2 @ Sep 1 2019, 08:03 PM)
Guys, I need some sifu to help me setup my Time Fiber on my RB4011AHX4, previously I've been using this router for Maxis using vlan 621. Trying to setup by myself but no luck on getting everything smooth and running. Searching over google with the only one guide to follow but still cannot, only managed to get to a few website and cant even ping to google dns. Speedtest.com keep having latency error. Plugged in back to the dir 882 everythings works fine. Are there any guide I missed in the wild or in lowyat forum I can make use of? smile.gif
*
TIME is very straightforward. No vlans. Nothing. Just do a reset and use quick setup for pppoe router.
Garena
post Sep 1 2019, 10:51 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
446 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(heidarren @ Sep 1 2019, 10:00 AM)
I hope you really know what you are saying, give you a key word, "hardware supported doesn't mean software supported"
*
Of course i know what i'm talking about. AnandTech reported that those smartphones that packed with the Broadcom chip that i mentioned do indeed support MU-MIMO because it's a 802.11ac Wave 2 chip. AnandTech referred to the teardown reports by third parties like TechInsights so i trust their source. I hope you go dig deeper and read.

Well if you wanna think that the iPhone Xs, Xs Max, Xr do not support MU-MIMO nobody's stopping you thinking that way though, it's up to you.

This post has been edited by Garena: Sep 12 2019, 09:25 AM
soonwai
post Sep 1 2019, 11:11 PM


********
All Stars
11,459 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: KL


QUOTE(Garena @ Sep 1 2019, 10:51 PM)
Of course i know what i'm saying. Anandtech reported that those smartphones that packed with the Broadcom chip that i mentioned do indeed support MU-MIMO because it's a 802.11ac Wave 2 chip. Anandtech referred to the teardown reports by third parties like TechInsights so i trust their source. I hope you go dig deeper and read.

Well if you wanna think that the iPhone Xs, Xs Max, Xr do not support MU-MIMO nobody's stopping you thinking that way though, it's up to you.
*
There're Wave 2 chip equipped devices which don't support Wave 2 features like MU-MIMO. In fact, Mikrotik has one. Can't recall which one though.

Edit: grammar

This post has been edited by soonwai: Sep 2 2019, 02:28 AM
Garena
post Sep 1 2019, 11:48 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
446 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
QUOTE(soonwai @ Sep 1 2019, 11:11 PM)
There're Wave 2 chip equipped devices which doesn't support Wave 2 features like MU-MIMO. In fact, Mikrotik has one. Can't recall which one though.
*
I don't just read, i do tests too. So far i've tested several 802.11ac Wave 1 devices like Nexus 5 (2014), Nexus 6P (2015) and 802.11ac Wave 2 devices like Galaxy S7 (2016), iPhone 8 Plus (2017) and iPhone Xs Max (2018) with a Aruba Networks 325 enterprise-grade 802.11ac Wave 2 access point. I do indeed experienced the MU-MIMO in action, the devices that packs with 802.11ac Wave 2 chip are much more stable in download and they are very little interfered by other wireless client (i won't say it doesn't being interfered at all because it's a lie if i say that), on the upload side the ping is not quite stable jumping up and down around 10-15 ms, well because 802.11ac Wave 2 MU-MIMO only works in download but not upload in case you don't know. Only in 802.11ax MU-MIMO works in both downlink and uplink. Thanks to the capabilities offered by the MU-MIMO technology, the access point can serve multiple devices simultaneously instead of just one at a time.

I set a laptop with a 802.11ac Wave 2 chip just to ping to a 802.11ac Wave 2 access point, and then i use the smartphones to do download and upload speedtests and transfer files locally. As i can see the laptop still has a very stable ping to the access point, 1-2 ms most of the time, well sometimes spike up to 5 ms or 10 ms but most of the time it's performing great and i'm quite satisfied with the performance of the Aruba Networks 325 enterprise-grade 802.11ac Wave 2 access point for the price i paid laugh.gif . Of course i'm not doing this in a closed space or at a desert, there are several neighbour Wi-Fi broadcasts around the airspace so there's still some wireless interference that are messing with my tests but the results are still considered satisfactory. Can't say the same with 802.11ac Wave 1 access point though, i applied the same tests but the ping spikes up to 20-30 ms and sometimes request timed out when large bits of data are travelling through the same 5 GHz band. When there is no download or upload activity, yes the ping is quite stable around 2-3 ms.

And then i take the old smartphones like Nexus 5 and Nexus 6P which comes with 802.11ac Wave 1 chip (SU-MIMO) to do the same tests, actually i feel like don't need to do it again because a few years ago i've already done those tests with a 802.11ac Wave 1 access point which were released in 2013 so i roughly know how are the results gonna end up but i'm very curious to see how is it gonna fare with a 802.11ac Wave 2 access point. In the end i didn't get the same results as i did with the previous tests i've done with smartphones that support 802.11ac Wave 2 because 802.11ac Wave 1 devices only able to take advantage of the capabilities offered by 802.11ac Wave 1 standard, the access point will fall back to backward compatibility standards for those wireless clients that do not support 802.11ac Wave 2 standard.

It's the same thing for 802.11ax wireless router or access point, sure our 802.11ac Wave 1 or Wave 2 devices can connect to a 802.11ax access point but it won't take advantage of the capabilities offered by the 802.11ax standard. In order to take advantage of a 802.11ax wireless router or access point you need a 802.11ax wireless client like the Galaxy S10 series, Galaxy Note 10 series, Intel Wireless-AX chip, or Killer Wireless-AX 1650 chip. I'm very excited to see what 802.11ax has to offer and how it's going to change the game. OFDMA is going to work with MU-MIMO and make the Wi-Fi even better and 802.11ax is all about efficiency. Btw do check out Killer Wireless-AC 1535 and 1550 though, it's worth the money. No I'm not sponsored by Killer Networking, I'm just very impressed by the performance after several tests especially the 5 GHz signal amplifiers which gives me an outstanding, solid and further 5 GHz wireless connection that i've never experienced before.

This post has been edited by Garena: Sep 12 2019, 09:36 AM
thongjj2 P
post Sep 2 2019, 01:43 PM

New Member
*
Probation
2 posts

Joined: Sep 2019
QUOTE(soonwai @ Sep 1 2019, 10:26 PM)
TIME is very straightforward. No vlans. Nothing. Just do a reset and use quick setup for pppoe router.
*
Yea, this is what I know so far when setting up time, but i can't ping to google dns at all, even setting dns like I do when using maxis. I can go to a few website like idownloadblog.com but not the major site like Google or youtube. The dlink 882 doesn't give me this issue though.
Gaara92
post Sep 3 2019, 04:10 PM

Herald
****
Junior Member
612 posts

Joined: Mar 2008


QUOTE(thongjj2 @ Sep 2 2019, 01:43 PM)
Yea, this is what I know so far when setting up time, but i can't ping to google dns at all, even setting dns like I do when using maxis. I can go to a few website like idownloadblog.com but not the major site like Google or youtube. The dlink 882 doesn't give me this issue though.
*
have u check your nat rules? dns already set up in the dhcp server?
soonwai
post Sep 3 2019, 04:49 PM


********
All Stars
11,459 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: KL


QUOTE(thongjj2 @ Sep 2 2019, 01:43 PM)
Yea, this is what I know so far when setting up time, but i can't ping to google dns at all, even setting dns like I do when using maxis. I can go to a few website like idownloadblog.com but not the major site like Google or youtube. The dlink 882 doesn't give me this issue though.
*
Post your /export here. Could be NAT or routing problem. Are you running IPv6?

This post has been edited by soonwai: Sep 3 2019, 04:49 PM
Garena
post Sep 4 2019, 04:05 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
446 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
So far I've been using MikroTik with Aruba access point and have no trouble whatsoever. Conclusion: a happy user.

This post has been edited by Garena: Jan 7 2020, 07:26 PM
paisyam
post Sep 6 2019, 07:05 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
11 posts

Joined: Jun 2013


hi. anyone using RB4011iGS+RM with latest routerOS and firmware? i'm using unifi 800mbps. using TM DLink 842 router i able to get 800++. but using RB4011iGS+RM i only get 200 -300mbps each port.
anyone can help?
soonwai
post Sep 6 2019, 07:54 PM


********
All Stars
11,459 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: KL


QUOTE(paisyam @ Sep 6 2019, 07:05 PM)
hi. anyone using RB4011iGS+RM with latest routerOS and firmware? i'm using unifi 800mbps.  using TM DLink 842 router i able to get 800++. but using RB4011iGS+RM i only get 200 -300mbps each port.
anyone can help?
*
Post /export for us to have a look.
paisyam
post Sep 6 2019, 09:33 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
11 posts

Joined: Jun 2013


# sep/06/2019 21:27:52 by RouterOS 6.45.5
# software id = 80LU-xxxx
#
# model = RB4011iGS+
# serial number = xxxxxxxxxxxx
/interface bridge
add name=Pembina-br
add name=SyberStation-br
add admin-mac=B8:69:F4:E6:C7:9D auto-mac=no comment=defconf name=bridge
/interface vlan
add interface=ether1 name=vlan500 vlan-id=500
/interface pppoe-client
add add-default-route=yes disabled=no interface=vlan500 max-mru=1492 max-mtu=\
1492 name="TM Unifi" password=xxxxxxxxxx service-name=unifi \
use-peer-dns=yes user=xxxxxxx@unifi
/interface ethernet switch port
set 0 default-vlan-id=0
set 1 default-vlan-id=0
set 2 default-vlan-id=0
set 3 default-vlan-id=0
set 4 default-vlan-id=0
set 5 default-vlan-id=0
set 6 default-vlan-id=0
set 7 default-vlan-id=0
set 8 default-vlan-id=0
set 9 default-vlan-id=0
set 10 default-vlan-id=0
set 11 default-vlan-id=0
/interface list
add comment=defconf name=WAN
add comment=defconf exclude=WAN include=all name=LAN
/interface wireless security-profiles
set [ find default=yes ] supplicant-identity=MikroTik
/ip pool
add name=dhcp ranges=192.168.88.10-192.168.88.254
/queue simple
add max-limit=50M/155M name="Blok E" queue=\
pcq-upload-default/pcq-download-default target="10.10.10.70/32,10.10.10.71\
/32,10.10.10.72/32,10.10.10.73/32,10.10.10.74/32"
add max-limit=30M/55M name=Generic parent="Blok E" queue=\
pcq-upload-default/pcq-download-default target=10.10.10.70/32
add max-limit=30M/55M name="Arun 5A2" parent="Blok E" queue=\
pcq-upload-default/pcq-download-default target=10.10.10.74/32
add max-limit=30M/55M name=Rara parent="Blok E" queue=\
pcq-upload-default/pcq-download-default target=10.10.10.73/32
add max-limit=30M/55M name=AZNiaga parent="Blok E" queue=\
pcq-upload-default/pcq-download-default target=10.10.10.72/32
add max-limit=10M/10M name=MyHouse parent="Blok E" queue=\
pcq-upload-default/pcq-download-default target=10.10.10.71/32
add max-limit=50M/155M name="Blok F" queue=\
pcq-upload-default/pcq-download-default target=\
10.10.10.50/32,10.10.10.51/32
add max-limit=50M/155M name="Blok 4" queue=\
pcq-upload-default/pcq-download-default target=\
10.10.10.90/32,10.10.10.91/32
add max-limit=30M/55M name=Hamzah parent="Blok F" queue=\
pcq-upload-default/pcq-download-default target=10.10.10.50/32
add max-limit=30M/55M name=Yusuf parent="Blok F" queue=\
pcq-upload-default/pcq-download-default target=10.10.10.51/32
add max-limit=250M/800M name=MyPC priority=5/5 queue=\
pcq-upload-default/pcq-download-default target=10.10.10.110/32
add max-limit=50M/100M name="MED Creative" queue=\
pcq-upload-default/pcq-download-default target=10.10.10.60/32
add max-limit=10M/30M name=Fahim parent="Blok 4" queue=\
pcq-upload-default/pcq-download-default target=10.10.10.90/32
add max-limit=30M/55M name="Abu Bakar" parent="Blok 4" queue=\
pcq-upload-default/pcq-download-default target=10.10.10.91/32
add max-limit=10M/25M name="Kak Ida" parent="Blok 4" queue=\
pcq-upload-default/pcq-download-default target=10.10.10.93/32
add max-limit=10M/30M name="Shah Ain" parent="Blok 4" queue=\
pcq-upload-default/pcq-download-default target=10.10.10.92/32
add max-limit=50M/155M name="Blok 3" queue=\
pcq-upload-default/pcq-download-default target=10.10.10.82/32
add max-limit=30M/55M name="Dr Asad" parent="Blok 3" target=10.10.10.82/32
add max-limit=50M/150M name="Syber Station" queue=\
pcq-upload-default/pcq-download-default target=10.10.10.115/32
add max-limit=80M/150M name="Pembina TS" queue=\
pcq-upload-default/pcq-download-default target=172.16.16.100/32
/interface bridge port
add bridge=bridge comment=defconf interface=ether2
add bridge=Pembina-br comment=defconf interface=ether3
add bridge=bridge comment=defconf interface=ether5
add bridge=bridge comment=defconf interface=ether6
add bridge=bridge comment=defconf interface=ether7
add bridge=bridge comment=defconf interface=ether8
add bridge=bridge comment=defconf interface=ether9
add bridge=bridge comment=defconf interface=ether10
add bridge=bridge comment=defconf interface=sfp-sfpplus1
add bridge=SyberStation-br interface=ether4
/ip neighbor discovery-settings
set discover-interface-list=LAN
/interface list member
add comment=defconf interface=ether1 list=WAN
add interface="TM Unifi" list=WAN
/ip address
add address=10.10.10.1/24 comment=defconf interface=ether2 network=10.10.10.0
add address=172.16.16.1/24 interface=ether3 network=172.16.16.0
add address=172.10.10.1/24 interface=ether4 network=172.10.10.0
/ip dhcp-client
add comment=defconf dhcp-options=hostname,clientid interface=ether1
/ip dns
set allow-remote-requests=yes servers=8.8.8.8,8.8.4.4
/ip dns static
add address=192.168.88.1 comment=defconf name=router.lan
/ip firewall filter
add action=accept chain=input comment=\
"defconf: accept established,related,untracked" connection-state=\
established,related,untracked
add action=drop chain=input comment="defconf: drop invalid" connection-state=\
invalid
add action=accept chain=input comment="defconf: accept ICMP" protocol=icmp
add action=accept chain=input comment=\
"defconf: accept to local loopback (for CAPsMAN)" dst-address=127.0.0.1
add action=drop chain=input comment="defconf: drop all not coming from LAN" \
in-interface="TM Unifi" in-interface-list=!LAN
add action=accept chain=forward comment="defconf: accept in ipsec policy" \
ipsec-policy=in,ipsec
add action=accept chain=forward comment="defconf: accept out ipsec policy" \
ipsec-policy=out,ipsec
add action=accept chain=forward comment=\
"defconf: accept established,related, untracked" connection-state=\
established,related,untracked
add action=drop chain=forward comment="defconf: drop invalid" \
connection-state=invalid
add action=drop chain=forward comment=\
"defconf: drop all from WAN not DSTNATed" connection-nat-state=!dstnat \
connection-state=new in-interface="TM Unifi" in-interface-list=WAN
/ip firewall nat
add action=masquerade chain=srcnat comment="defconf: masquerade" \
ipsec-policy=out,none out-interface="TM Unifi" out-interface-list=WAN
/system clock
set time-zone-name=Asia/Kuala_Lumpur
/tool mac-server
set allowed-interface-list=LAN
/tool mac-server mac-winbox
set allowed-interface-list=LAN

please have a look. i am no expert. everything about mikrotik i learn from youtube mikrotik web.

This post has been edited by paisyam: Sep 7 2019, 07:50 AM
heidarren
post Sep 6 2019, 09:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
248 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
ROS v7 Beta for ARM has just released

http://mt.lv/v7

Linux kernel has upgraded from 3.3.5 to 4.14.131

Mainly for ARM devices like hAP AC2, try it at your own risk

This post has been edited by heidarren: Sep 6 2019, 09:44 PM
soonwai
post Sep 6 2019, 09:47 PM


********
All Stars
11,459 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: KL


paisyam Your queues limiting the speed maybe? Which port and ip when you do the test that results in ~200Mbps?

A quick test you can do is disable all your queues and run the Speedtest again.
Garena
post Sep 10 2019, 06:33 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
446 posts

Joined: Dec 2009
Recently Telekom Malaysia turbo upgrade one of my unifi subscription plans. The unifi plan is catered for a hostel that i manage. There were around 30 devices connected to the access point when i was doing this speedtest.

300 Mbps upload with unifi 300 Mbps plan? What kind of sorcery is this? I thought unifi 300 Mbps plan comes with asymmetrical speed of 300 Mbps download and 50 Mbps upload? Even the highest speed unifi 800 Mbps plan only comes with 200 Mbps upload. unifi turbo upgrade plans are 800 d/200 u, 500 d/100 u, 300 d/50 u.

Bersyukurrrrrr, now can upload files to the internet at faster speed haha. Nice.



This post has been edited by Garena: Sep 11 2019, 07:10 PM

176 Pages « < 102 103 104 105 106 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0369sec    0.22    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 22nd December 2025 - 03:58 AM