Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 70 71 72 73 74 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V54!, The Orange Legion

views
     
shootkk
post Oct 11 2011, 11:11 AM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(zstan @ Oct 11 2011, 10:58 AM)
Well according to Sonyalpharumors, Zeiss will NOT produce anymore DT lenses. Future Zeiss lenses will all be full frame.

And about the baby Zeiss, I think it will still have it's markets. It IS a Zeiss after all and I know many people would rather have that extra 30mm range at the expense of constant f2.8 , SSm and weather seal.

Both lenses will have their buyers IMO.
*
That's stretching it by a little, don't you think? hahaha.. extra 30mm for 3 other things wor... you could just step a bit closer you know... works most times I would say...
kysham
post Oct 11 2011, 11:23 AM

Photo Fanatics
*******
Senior Member
3,461 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Kota Kinabalu, Sabah



an extra 30mm is still an extra 30mm. some people will appreciate it, while others can't really be bothered with it. what zstan said is likely the case. these two lenses will cater to different users.
TSalbnok
post Oct 11 2011, 11:33 AM

Alpha Male
Group Icon
Elite
4,956 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL


ieR: Nice! The girl sitting down was a very interesting touch.

shootkk: Stepping closer means a different background and different perspective. Not quite the same thing.
shootkk
post Oct 11 2011, 11:36 AM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


Agreed on points raised by zstan and kysham but I would say the Zeiss is catering for a very small group of users.

Back in the days before the 16-50mm, the Zeiss faces stiff competition from the Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 and the biggest factor is of course the price. While the Tamron is a huge gap away from Zeiss, the Sony 16-50mm has lessened that gap considerably while still maintaining a lower price.

The 16-80 Zeiss is caught in a very awkward position. For budget conscious users, the Sony 16-50mm seems to be the logical choice. For those who are not budget conscious, they might as well go for the 16-35mm f2.8 SSM Zeiss and couple that with a 70-200mm f2.8 G SSM

Even if you're not planning on going FF, the A77 kit that bundles the 16-50mm will deter a lot from buying the 16-80mm Zeiss

I would think the 16-80mm Zeiss is headed for discontinuation.

Of course this is all my opinion lah...
lwliam
post Oct 11 2011, 12:19 PM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


It's a shame the 16-50 2.8 ssm isn't a FF. Else I'd be buying it on a blink of an eye. Since it's not a Zeiss, the price will be very competitive compared with the 16-35Z.
ieR
post Oct 11 2011, 12:26 PM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
albnok: thanks smile.gif i am coming back alive~ back to shooting girls again tongue.gif its been a while i last shoot... (ever since i join workshops)

guys: not quite true, zeiss will make optics for sony, most sony lens are designed by sony themself, then the optics, is base on sony's requirement, the optics designed and build by zeiss, not the other way around. sony "uses" zeiss optics. not Zeiss makes sony lens. so its SONY decision to make more zeiss lens or not. Zeiss are still a optic supplier.

16-80 is totally diff then 1650. if i were to go traveling to taiwan, i rather bring just one 16-80 then any other lens (16105 is great too, BUT....) i can imagine how light i can travel with 1680+A35! but travel journal is never about super sharpness, but rather moment and reach. so again, it depend what you are "needing"(practicality) not what you 'greed'(spec)... greed? of coz i greed for 300F2.8... but i dont need it =.=


Added on October 11, 2011, 1:01 pm

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


more here

This post has been edited by ieR: Oct 11 2011, 01:01 PM
jimlim007
post Oct 11 2011, 01:33 PM

Enoch
*******
Senior Member
4,073 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(lwliam @ Oct 11 2011, 12:19 PM)
It's a shame the 16-50 2.8 ssm isn't a FF. Else I'd be buying it on a blink of an eye. Since it's not a Zeiss, the price will be very competitive compared with the 16-35Z.
*
this is not a shame, this is for aps-c amount with range 16-50mm powered f2.8 & SSM which try to fill the gap which canon already have 17-55mm f2.8 USM IS and now you one more choice besides the Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 VC w/o ssm.

definitely smart move to put SSM and f2.8. this will be duplicate effort if 16-50 FF and ppl start complaint why we have similar lens, why not doing some thing new user needs tongue.gif


Added on October 11, 2011, 1:38 pm
QUOTE(ieR @ Oct 11 2011, 12:34 AM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


more here
*
play 4P blink.gif thumbup.gif hehe nice shot!

This post has been edited by jimlim007: Oct 11 2011, 01:38 PM
lwliam
post Oct 11 2011, 02:32 PM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


QUOTE(jimlim007 @ Oct 11 2011, 01:33 PM)
this is not a shame, this is for aps-c amount with range 16-50mm powered f2.8 & SSM which try to fill the gap which canon already have 17-55mm f2.8 USM IS and now you one more choice besides the Tamron 17-50mm f2.8 VC w/o ssm.

definitely smart move to put SSM and f2.8. this will be duplicate effort if 16-50 FF and ppl start complaint why we have similar lens, why not doing some thing new user needs  tongue.gif


Added on October 11, 2011, 1:38 pm

play 4P  blink.gif  thumbup.gif hehe nice shot!
*
Saying it as 'it's a shame' is a figure of speech FYI if your daft enough. Giving a same meaning as 'too bad' as it would be good for me, not nessecary that it must be done because of one person's request.
kysham
post Oct 11 2011, 04:06 PM

Photo Fanatics
*******
Senior Member
3,461 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Kota Kinabalu, Sabah



QUOTE(ieR @ Oct 11 2011, 12:26 PM)
guys: not quite true, zeiss will make optics for sony, most sony lens are designed by sony themself, then the optics, is base on sony's requirement, the optics designed and build by zeiss, not the other way around. sony "uses" zeiss optics. not Zeiss makes sony lens. so its SONY decision to make more zeiss lens or not. Zeiss are still a optic supplier.

*
Although Zeiss probably does not physically make the lens itself, I am sure Sony must get some form of approval from Zeiss for the lens design, because the lens design and optics must be closely related. And don't forget Sony is putting the Zeiss logo on the lens, so no way Zeiss is going to allow that without any form of quality control from their part. Every Zeiss lens has a signature card from Zeiss, so I don't believe their involvement is strictly "just supply the optics" alone.

I believe the collaboration may work this way:

Sony propose a lens design to Zeiss -> Zeiss agrees to the lens design -> Sony do the engineering work, with input from Zeiss -> Sony manufactures the lenses, with optics supplied by Zeiss


jimlim007
post Oct 11 2011, 05:13 PM

Enoch
*******
Senior Member
4,073 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


seriously, i will gila soon rclxub.gif ; bahaya break - go -bahaya break-go; just release to go with A77VQ, now pull break again on A77VQ observed on A7X new camera in plan. This sony so cute, may be 16MP A77 body+features lol dreamimng

(SR4) One more APS-C model in the works (A75?)

This post has been edited by jimlim007: Oct 11 2011, 05:30 PM
shootkk
post Oct 11 2011, 05:33 PM

Loyal Sony A100 User
Group Icon
Elite
2,540 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
From: KL


QUOTE(jimlim007 @ Oct 11 2011, 05:13 PM)
seriously, i will gila soon  rclxub.gif ; bahaya break - go -bahaya break-go; just release to go with A77VQ, now pull break again on A77VQ observed on A7X new camera in plan. This sony so cute, may be 16MP A77 body+features lol dreamimng

(SR4) One more APS-C model in the works (A75?)
*
Probably not true lah.... Would have been more believable if they said that the sensor was FF! Hahaha! The A99 is coming!!! brows.gif
ks1234
post Oct 11 2011, 07:35 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
81 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
From: Klang
All sifu, I wanna ask our alpha camera can use at winter time ar?
zstan
post Oct 11 2011, 07:38 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



QUOTE(ks1234 @ Oct 11 2011, 07:35 PM)
All sifu, I wanna ask our alpha camera can use at winter time ar?
*
depends how are you gonna use it.

If you plan to sink your camera in the snow then your best bet is the a77 with the kit lens. The a900 and a850 are reported to be able to withstand these strong environments but beware that warranty would not cover should anything go amiss.

Other cameras, take your risk lo. Please report your test here. Thanks laugh.gif
Mikeshashimi
post Oct 11 2011, 07:43 PM

10 Years on LYN
*******
Senior Member
4,053 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Kuching


QUOTE(ks1234 @ Oct 11 2011, 07:35 PM)
All sifu, I wanna ask our alpha camera can use at winter time ar?
*
your question is not specific enough.

theres varying conditions of 'winter'.

In Tasmania (where I am) - temperature can drop until 0 degrees sometimes.
In Russia is much much much much lower (im sure on the numbers but I think its -20+?)

So you have to be specific. icon_rolleyes.gif
jimlim007
post Oct 11 2011, 07:54 PM

Enoch
*******
Senior Member
4,073 posts

Joined: Aug 2006


QUOTE(shootkk @ Oct 11 2011, 05:33 PM)
Probably not true lah.... Would have been more believable if they said that the sensor was FF! Hahaha! The A99 is coming!!!  brows.gif
*
if we talking canon or nikon rumor, i believe is not true. but some how sony and m43 rumor are very reliable and this round it is SAR4 brows.gif multiple source sayd a77 is not the toppest model in apsc, very interesting.

since the sony centre SA no call back me to explain the more detail, then i have to wait. quite terrible this area sony centre, althought is rare item sold in shop, but this gal job is shakehead.gif she is quite look down on me when i ask her about dslr laugh.gif
ks1234
post Oct 11 2011, 08:41 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
81 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
From: Klang
QUOTE(Mikeshashimi @ Oct 11 2011, 07:43 PM)
your question is not specific enough.

theres varying conditions of 'winter'.

In Tasmania (where I am) - temperature can drop until 0 degrees sometimes.
In Russia is much much much much lower (im sure on the numbers but I think its -20+?)

So you have to be specific.  icon_rolleyes.gif
*
im going to china soon. so the weather there is already winter. i scared bring the there then my a33 will GG! the temperature i not sure is how much.
Mikeshashimi
post Oct 11 2011, 08:51 PM

10 Years on LYN
*******
Senior Member
4,053 posts

Joined: Jun 2009
From: Kuching


http://www.travelchinaguide.com/climate/beijing.htm

"The coldest month is January, with its lowest temperature at -20 C (-4 F)"
zstan
post Oct 11 2011, 09:01 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
15,856 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Zion



New APS-C camera? Sony really troll all of you la! laugh.gif
ieR
post Oct 11 2011, 09:09 PM

~Cursed Member~
Group Icon
Elite
3,928 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak
QUOTE(kysham @ Oct 11 2011, 04:06 PM)
Sony propose a lens design to Zeiss -> Zeiss agrees/reject to the lens design proposal -> Sony do the engineering work, with input from Zeiss -> Sony manufactures the lenses < Zeiss make optics base on the specfication then supply to Sony, hand assemble by Sony (zeiss trained/authorized) assembler
*
but how ever it goes, still, sony wouldnt make it this far without close relationship with zeiss. but knowing sony, they only buy from themself or own it. so i highly believe they have deep relation with zeiss. i seen some medical equipment build by Sony with Zeiss optics inside. but sony wouldnt make stupid moves also. because a single decision affect 20 years to come. that why the 1680 will stay.
lwliam
post Oct 11 2011, 09:11 PM

Your friendly neighborhood photographer
Group Icon
Elite
6,075 posts

Joined: Jan 2006
From: 3.1553587,101.7135668


QUOTE(ks1234 @ Oct 11 2011, 08:41 PM)
im going to china soon. so the weather there is already winter. i scared bring the there then my a33 will GG! the temperature i not sure is how much.
*
There'll be no issues with bringing your camera gears to China during winter.

You'd need to watch out for 2 small things though.

1. If it's really really cold out there, and you don't plan to use your camera for a long period (let's say 3-4 hours), take out the battery and keep it in your jacket or pants pocket where it is warmer. Cold weather is not an ideal condition for battery storage. This applies to all types of batteries (Sony, Canon, Nikon, Olympus, AA, AAA, D, acid... etc)

2. If you are moving from cold to warm environment (ie. outdoors to shopping mall), make sure you do not immediately turn on or remove your camera from the bag. Let the camera body and lens to adapt to the warmer environment for a little while (5-10 minutes) to prevent condensation from forming on the lens and sensor. It is not damaging to your camera if it happens, but DO NOT attempt to clean the condensation on the sensor if you're not familiar with sensor cleaning. If is happens on your lens, just give it a quick wipe with a microfiber/lens cloth.

This post has been edited by lwliam: Oct 11 2011, 09:13 PM

126 Pages « < 70 71 72 73 74 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0288sec    0.87    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 21st December 2025 - 12:10 PM