Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
124 Pages « < 89 90 91 92 93 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V11, The Darth Vader troops !

views
     
jchue73
post Sep 5 2011, 12:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,496 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(1kokies @ Sep 5 2011, 05:23 AM)
jchue that 80-200 for concert shoot is sharp !!!! Makes me want to get one too.
I really dig shooting at concerts and I miss shooting at fashion shows. It presents the most challenging situation for the shooter when whatever you read is being put to practice. But to be able to shoot at one (especially concerts) is quite difficult as you need proper credentials.

QUOTE(freddy manson @ Sep 5 2011, 07:06 AM)
I don't know about landscape but for wedding/events then the fast f2.8 sure comes in handy
Agreed. DoF at f/2.8 wide open and at those focal lengths is quite a lot and usable for weddings / events. Landscape usually use small aperture and any reasonable wide angle lens is able to perform nicely.

QUOTE(onscreen @ Sep 5 2011, 10:34 AM)
Oh? I didn't realized that but that were based on my hands-on handling. Tried the AFS 80-200mm and 70-200mm VRII side by side, the 80-200mm seems comfortably light for me while 70-200mm have a heavy middle. Mounted on D300 with battery grip as well as mounted on a D3.
Well, it's just nitpicking as it's only very slightly heavier than the 70-200. Actually the 70-200 is more hand holdable since it's easier to hand hold the barrel.

QUOTE(onscreen @ Sep 5 2011, 10:34 AM)
14-24mm were made specially for fullframers only. Yes, not many people shoot at wide open as distortion are obvious to naked eye but with Photoshop, you can just correct the distortion. Tried this lens, heavy and need extra care on the front glass. Easy to have any finger poke into it tongue.gif

It can be used for landscape and best is to shoot at 15mm. Comfortable in view for me on the finishing shot.
I think you meant shooting at the wide end (14mm) as oppose to shooting wide open at f/2.8... biggrin.gif

Yes, it looks lovely on FX. You can still use it on DX though but it's a little awkward since you can save and go with cheaper DX lens options. If you need to use the 14-24mm f/2.8 on a DX body, you must really know what you're doing and need the lens' strengths and accept no compromises.

What I like about the 14-24mm f/2.8 is the ability to use f/2.8 and still get sharp in the middle and reasonably sharp across the frame.

QUOTE(gnome @ Sep 5 2011, 10:57 AM)
ahhhh icic...that day i wish i have a 1.4x TC though, could use the extra reach laugh.gif

owh and awesome concert photos there! thumbup.gif
Thanks. Sometimes 1.4x TC also not enough for birding. sad.gif I've gone birding with people using 600mm + 1.4x TC on a DX body ! sweat.gif

user posted image

user posted image

This was my old attempt at KF at the backyard of my house. Too far away and quality not as good as I was using the version 1 of the 2.0x TC.

user posted image

I have a recent one which I shot a month or two ago with the latest 2.0x TCEIII. Need to look for it. If I recall, the KF was closer but the background was a little more busy.

QUOTE(gnome @ Sep 5 2011, 11:01 AM)
Saw one for sale at YL Camera not long ago, RM3.9k which is not bad i think thumbup.gif
Yes, you cannot get the AF-S 80-200mm f/2.8 new as Nikon has discontinued this lens quite while back when the 70-200mm f/2.8 VR1 came out. So getting it from a reputable shop like YL is quite important to guarantee that you don't receive a dud since older lenses with AF-S motors is quite expensive to replace.
gnome
post Sep 5 2011, 12:19 PM

- We game, do you? -
*******
Senior Member
4,925 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
Whoops sorry forgot to mention it was USED lens laugh.gif

http://www.shutterasia.com/forum/showthread.php?t=46646

Still not bad i think, saw people selling 4k+ before this sweat.gif
onscreen
post Sep 5 2011, 12:49 PM

Nomby
****
Senior Member
675 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: PJ, Selangor


QUOTE(gnome @ Sep 5 2011, 12:19 PM)
Whoops sorry forgot to mention it was USED lens laugh.gif

http://www.shutterasia.com/forum/showthread.php?t=46646

Still not bad i think, saw people selling 4k+ before this sweat.gif
*
yeah, i know its used lens. Was assuming that you saw it in the shop. Rm3.8k ~ RM3.9k is the price i am hunting. Some went up as high as RM4.8k for the black one where i can pay the price for a white version.
ifer
post Sep 5 2011, 01:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,637 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(jchue73 @ Sep 5 2011, 02:18 AM)
When in doubt, buy all.  laugh.gif
*
this is so right. but one has to know when to use what lens... but having said that, my 35mm 1.4 choice is towards the carl zeiss version.
VaLeNrUdOn
post Sep 5 2011, 01:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
166 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Penang


hi..newbie here!!...

jchue73
post Sep 5 2011, 02:04 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,496 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(onscreen @ Sep 5 2011, 12:49 PM)
yeah, i know its used lens. Was assuming that you saw it in the shop. Rm3.8k ~ RM3.9k is the price i am hunting. Some went up as high as RM4.8k for the black one where i can pay the price for a white version.
Is there a HB-17 lenshood included? I don't see one. Perhaps the reason why it's relatively cheaper and have not been sold yet. The HB-17 lenshood is not easy to find.

QUOTE(ifer @ Sep 5 2011, 01:41 PM)
this is so right. but one has to know when to use what lens... but having said that, my 35mm 1.4 choice is towards the carl zeiss version.
Have you sourced for it yet? I'm told the price is close to Nikon's 35mm f/1.4. Is that correct?
ifer
post Sep 5 2011, 02:16 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
4,637 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(jchue73 @ Sep 5 2011, 02:04 PM)
Have you sourced for it yet? I'm told the price is close to Nikon's 35mm f/1.4. Is that correct?
*
it's more expensive that nikon's actually.
shashinki are selling it for rm 5598 (import set)
and if i am not mistaken, shriro are selling it for rm 6000+ (local warranty)
Everdying
post Sep 5 2011, 02:35 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(vearn27 @ Sep 5 2011, 02:38 AM)
It may poke my heart if they refreshed the 17-55 since I just got mine not long ago biggrin.gif
OT: You working in IT field kah? tongue.gif
*
lol, nah...in A&P.
but i'm a IT networking grad tongue.gif
Calvin Seak
post Sep 5 2011, 02:51 PM

Hiring, TTDI, KL only
*******
Senior Member
2,448 posts

Joined: Oct 2008

I think I saw the 80-200 push pull at a shop in up townies around 3k I think and it's pretty heavy but eventually I opt for the sigma 70-200

This post has been edited by Calvin Seak: Sep 5 2011, 02:56 PM
celciuz
post Sep 5 2011, 03:08 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Sep 5 2011, 02:04 PM)
Is there a HB-17 lenshood included? I don't see one. Perhaps the reason why it's relatively cheaper and have not been sold yet. The HB-17 lenshood is not easy to find.
*
Nikon hoods are relatively hard to find sad.gif even the 85mm f/1.4G one also whole Msia no stock lol.
gnome
post Sep 5 2011, 03:21 PM

- We game, do you? -
*******
Senior Member
4,925 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(onscreen @ Sep 5 2011, 12:49 PM)
yeah, i know its used lens. Was assuming that you saw it in the shop. Rm3.8k ~ RM3.9k is the price i am hunting. Some went up as high as RM4.8k for the black one where i can pay the price for a white version.
*
Ouch that's quite expensive sweat.gif

QUOTE(Calvin Seak @ Sep 5 2011, 02:51 PM)
I think I saw the 80-200 push pull at a shop in up townies around 3k I think and  it's pretty heavy but eventually I opt for the sigma 70-200
*
You sure its a push pull? not the two touch version? also you using D5100 right so its a no brainer to go for sigma 70200 laugh.gif

QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 5 2011, 03:08 PM)
Nikon hoods are relatively hard to find sad.gif even the 85mm f/1.4G one also whole Msia no stock lol.
*
True especially for old lens, luckily my 80200 comes with a hood biggrin.gif (seller bundle it together haha)

Anyways some colour test in photoshop

user posted image

btw notice anything odd? tongue.gif
Everdying
post Sep 5 2011, 03:23 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(gnome @ Sep 5 2011, 03:21 PM)
Ouch that's quite expensive sweat.gif
You sure its a push pull? not the two touch version? also you using D5100 right so its a no brainer to go for sigma 70200 laugh.gif
True especially for old lens, luckily my 80200 comes with a hood biggrin.gif (seller bundle it together haha)

Anyways some colour test in photoshop

user posted image

btw notice anything odd? tongue.gif
*
something on the lens? tongue.gif


Added on September 5, 2011, 3:24 pm
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Sep 5 2011, 02:04 PM)
Is there a HB-17 lenshood included? I don't see one. Perhaps the reason why it's relatively cheaper and have not been sold yet. The HB-17 lenshood is not easy to find.
Have you sourced for it yet? I'm told the price is close to Nikon's 35mm f/1.4. Is that correct?
*
wondering why not many ppl use the collapsible rubber hood?
its as deep, doesnt vignette, and more convenient.
afterall if its good enough for joe mcnally... tongue.gif

anyway, a niece of mine with 17-55, image just cropped.
user posted image

This post has been edited by Everdying: Sep 5 2011, 03:26 PM
Agito666
post Sep 5 2011, 03:34 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
11,861 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Bangalasia
QUOTE(gnome @ Sep 5 2011, 03:21 PM)
Ouch that's quite expensive sweat.gif
You sure its a push pull? not the two touch version? also you using D5100 right so its a no brainer to go for sigma 70200 laugh.gif
True especially for old lens, luckily my 80200 comes with a hood biggrin.gif (seller bundle it together haha)

Anyways some colour test in photoshop

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


btw notice anything odd? tongue.gif
*
dont tell me the shirt is not red actually? laugh.gif
you sengaja make is so obvious red and let people thinking you over saturate the red, but actually the shirt is white? unsure.gif
gnome
post Sep 5 2011, 03:37 PM

- We game, do you? -
*******
Senior Member
4,925 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Everdying @ Sep 5 2011, 03:23 PM)
something on the lens? tongue.gif


Added on September 5, 2011, 3:24 pm

wondering why not many ppl use the collapsible rubber hood?
its as deep, doesnt vignette, and more convenient.
afterall if its good enough for joe mcnally... tongue.gif

anyway, a niece of mine with 17-55, image just cropped.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
I havent seen any rubber hood on sale here, i use ciplak HB29+adapter on my twotouch laugh.gif

QUOTE(Agito666 @ Sep 5 2011, 03:34 PM)
dont tell me the shirt is not red actually?  laugh.gif
you sengaja make is so obvious red and let people thinking you over saturate the red, but actually the shirt is white? unsure.gif
*
lol try again guise tongue.gif

I think sifu2 sure can notice one brows.gif
-kytz-
post Sep 5 2011, 03:41 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,573 posts

Joined: Nov 2008
Ibu jari laugh.gif
Everdying
post Sep 5 2011, 03:44 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(gnome @ Sep 5 2011, 03:37 PM)
I havent seen any rubber hood on sale here, i use ciplak HB29+adapter on my twotouch laugh.gif
lol try again guise tongue.gif

I think sifu2 sure can notice one brows.gif
*
rubber hood quite a few places have la.
i got mine from shashinki.
user posted image
Agito666
post Sep 5 2011, 03:45 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
11,861 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Bangalasia
QUOTE(gnome @ Sep 5 2011, 03:37 PM)
I havent seen any rubber hood on sale here, i use ciplak HB29+adapter on my twotouch laugh.gif
lol try again guise tongue.gif

I think sifu2 sure can notice one brows.gif
*
the whole people is fake one, you put in there?
or the bokeh is fake one?
gnome
post Sep 5 2011, 03:47 PM

- We game, do you? -
*******
Senior Member
4,925 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Agito666 @ Sep 5 2011, 03:45 PM)
the whole people is fake one, you put in there?
or the bokeh is fake one?
*
Ding ding ding! we have a winner!

Yeap bokeh is fake laugh.gif. Its a pic from mobile phone actually tongue.gif
jchue73
post Sep 5 2011, 03:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,496 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
QUOTE(Calvin Seak @ Sep 5 2011, 02:51 PM)
I think I saw the 80-200 push pull at a shop in up townies around 3k I think and  it's pretty heavy but eventually I opt for the sigma 70-200
For push-pull, shouldn't be that price. Expensive.

QUOTE(celciuz @ Sep 5 2011, 03:08 PM)
Nikon hoods are relatively hard to find sad.gif even the 85mm f/1.4G one also whole Msia no stock lol.
You're still hood-less?
celciuz
post Sep 5 2011, 04:04 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
QUOTE(jchue73 @ Sep 5 2011, 03:57 PM)
For push-pull, shouldn't be that price. Expensive.
You're still hood-less?
*
ReeNz helped me buy when he returned to Malaysia from USA. Had to grab it from B&H. For 2 or 3 months whole Nikon Malaysia no stock.

124 Pages « < 89 90 91 92 93 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0322sec    1.29    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 24th December 2025 - 03:26 PM