I see some good discussions over the past few days. :claps:
Although it's too early to post on AW's season review or something, it's always nice to have healthy discussions on any topics.
I'd like to share my thoughts on this as well.
non-tactical/strategy reasonsAlthough many would argue that it's just an excuse, but AW/Arsenal really suffers badly from
1. Bad and "disturbing" tackles / injuries
2. Bad refereeing, especially on critical games
3. Bad luck

Well, these are subjective, so no point elaborating or discussing them further. Many may say it's part of the game, but for me, these hit us harder.
tactical/strategy reasons1. Youth Policy
Actually AW knows that Youth policy is hard, he has been stubborn at first (and let many of the Invincible team left) but later, he realized this. That's why he has (already) started injecting some experienced players. Don't tell me players like Arshavin and Rosicky are young when they were brought in. New players like Koscielny (26), Squillaci (30) and Chamakh (27) are all but "young" to me. You see, AW knew this and he has been trying to alter between youth policy and a competitive squad. All I can say is AW is still trying, trying hard and has yet found the right balance.
2. Experienced/Senior Players
I must admit (as pointed above) that AW has made a big mistake for letting go the Invincible team, many of them that I do not even understand why, such as Lauren (who is quiet and loyal), Campbell (who went to "Oversea" Portsmouth), Toure (fighting with Gallas? + $$$?), Gilberto (losing place to Flamini + captaincy to Gallas), Vieira ($$$? Performance drop?), Ljungberg (understandably his poor form after injury), Pires (free transfer???), etc.
It's not about phasing out non-productive players that simple, it's more about having some "Old Guards" in the team, not necessarily as captains, to lead and look after the team. Also, the 30+ 1 year contract should be reviewed.
3. Tactics
Both our Invincible's split-second attack and the current multi-passing game are good to watch. My only complaint is that AW should have a Plan B, and polish it as much as he does for the Plan A. There have been many occasions where the Plan A did not work and the team would get confused what to do next. Besides that, the same goes to playing without certain key players. But to be fair, AW has adopted more direct passing to the center recently.
4. Spending
AW does spend! Just that he doesn't spend 30M for a player, we should not label him for not spending enough

We have our model on how to do the business, same goes to MU, Liverpool, ManCity etc... I am happy with AW/Arsenal way.
5. Holding midfielder
True enough, this is what we are lacking. Our best midfielder partnership (when we play 4-4-2) was Vieira+Gilberto. Gilberto was the invisible wall. Vieira, despite his role was box-to-box midfielder, I found out that he more defensive-minded as compared to offensive. Then, came Flamini as our tireless and combative defensive midfielder. Now, we have Song but current trend of football causes injury more often and we need a reliable backup. Wilshere is good but he's more a Vieira than a Gilberto to me.
... more points to share but my time is limited, to be continued.
Verdict:
We are on the right track, as long as AW/Arsenal learns what happens/happened. After all, we are still the closest challengers to League title

On Lehmann signing, it's good. With a contract, it's better than the intermittent "training sessions" by ex-players
This post has been edited by kimhoong: Mar 15 2011, 02:48 PM