Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V5, Anticipating D700 replacement !
|
|
 Feb 21 2011, 06:40 PM
|
 
Junior Member
302 posts Joined: Jul 2010 
|
@Andy , thanks for correcting me.
QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Feb 21 2011, 06:34 PM) instead of the Tokina 12-24 might as well go for the Tokina 11-16 since you already have the 18-70 to cover the range ... Tokina 11-16mm cannot focus on nikon d3100 if not mistaken no regrets ...  |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 06:42 PM
|
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur 
|
QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Feb 21 2011, 06:39 PM) doesnt feel like a prime to me ... but i mostly use it at 11mm ... plus the constant f/2.8 is good ... mind to share it's price range?does it has AF-S? |
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 06:42 PM
|
Senior Member
4,925 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
Been thinking, should i go with
35mm F/2, 50mm 1.4D and 85mm 1.4 (samyang, manual  ) |
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 06:43 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(gnome @ Feb 21 2011, 06:42 PM) Been thinking, should i go with 35mm F/2, 50mm 1.4D and 85mm 1.4 (samyang, manual ) Good luck for that samyang bro. |
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 06:45 PM
|
Senior Member
1,676 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: LiTtLe BiG pL@NeT
|
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Feb 21 2011, 06:42 PM) mind to share it's price range? its around RM2.2k to RM2.3k ... forgot that you're using a D3100 bro ... only manual focus then ...does it has AF-S? |
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 06:46 PM
|
|
Junior Member
302 posts Joined: Jul 2010
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 21 2011, 06:20 PM) I visit KL bird park with 18105 last year with my friends, on the way back went to pick up a 70200 VRII after the bird park LOL! Damn impulsive cause I shoot bird like shooting landscape at 105mm lol~ Somemore that time VR2 just out and another friend got it and started poisoning me non stop. Damn. Celciuz you make me want go for 16-35mm because u mentioned (i know i will be going for FX)......lol i just make my mind to go for 1750mm 2.8.I won't even look at those 2 brands to be honest  Compared to Hoya HD, yes! Tougher to clean. All new lens have AF-S. I use 1635 too . I'm a DX user and now an FX user. Was thinking to grab the 1750 or rather the 1755, ended up with 1635 cause I know I will be going for FX.This post has been edited by bbuser91: Feb 21 2011, 06:47 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 06:47 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,457 posts Joined: Nov 2010 From: Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur
|
QUOTE(eddy230379 @ Feb 21 2011, 06:45 PM) its around RM2.2k to RM2.3k ... forgot that you're using a D3100 bro ... only manual focus then ... ohh.. it's unlike tokina 12-24 which has two version? Okay then let's put it aside first. |
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 06:51 PM
|
Senior Member
4,016 posts Joined: Mar 2005 From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing 
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 21 2011, 06:20 PM) All new lens have AF-S. Yup.. all new lens have SWM but not all lens currently in production have swm. |
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 07:00 PM
|
Senior Member
2,966 posts Joined: Apr 2008 From: Macross Galaxy
|
QUOTE(bbuser91 @ Feb 21 2011, 06:46 PM) Celciuz you make me want go for 16-35mm because u mentioned (i know i will be going for FX)......lol i just make my mind to go for 1750mm 2.8. 1750 is fine lah. You still can sell it away after you upgrade anyway. Its cheap lens to invest compared to 1755 nikkor  Remember 16-35 is only F4 so don't expect to get very nice bokeh when taking half body or full body portraits  This post has been edited by edwardgsk: Feb 21 2011, 07:01 PM |
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 07:02 PM
|
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(Everdying @ Feb 21 2011, 06:25 PM) blah, stupid hoya hmc filter...it softens my images a bit. Really? But it looks ok on my 50mm f/1.8D though.QUOTE(bbuser91 @ Feb 21 2011, 06:46 PM) Celciuz you make me want go for 16-35mm because u mentioned (i know i will be going for FX)......lol i just make my mind to go for 1750mm 2.8. Haha, initially I went with 1635 on D90. Quite regret cause f/4 slow... That time I'm used to f/2.8 on my 70200 suddenly f/4 :S. A bit pekcek LOL.QUOTE(alpha_company @ Feb 21 2011, 06:51 PM) Yup.. all new lens have SWM but not all lens currently in production have swm. Of course, there's many old lens still in production  |
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 07:06 PM
|
 
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 21 2011, 07:02 PM) Really? But it looks ok on my 50mm f/1.8D though. On a telephoto can tell got small difference.Its like finer detail has a slight haze over it. Got someone on dpreview forum who also complain same thing. here - http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat...87&changemode=1 same lens, same filter, same prob his samples all gone already, but i got some of my own. This post has been edited by Everdying: Feb 21 2011, 07:11 PM |
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 07:13 PM
|
|
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(Everdying @ Feb 21 2011, 07:06 PM) On a telephoto can tell got small difference. So lousy meh... lucky I didn't use HMC for my 70200 or 85 then phew.Its like finer detail has a slight haze over it. Got someone on dpreview forum who also complain same thing. |
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 07:15 PM
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 21 2011, 07:13 PM) So lousy meh... lucky I didn't use HMC for my 70200 or 85 then phew. wat u using on 70200? |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 07:20 PM
|
|
All Stars
14,037 posts Joined: Nov 2004
|
QUOTE(Everdying @ Feb 21 2011, 07:15 PM) wat u using on 70200? Using Hoya HD on it. |
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 07:23 PM
|
|
Junior Member
302 posts Joined: Jul 2010
|
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Feb 21 2011, 07:00 PM) 1750 is fine lah. You still can sell it away after you upgrade anyway. Its cheap lens to invest compared to 1755 nikkor Ya , was thinking get tamron 1750mm VC after that only upgrade built in motor bodyRemember 16-35 is only F4 so don't expect to get very nice bokeh when taking half body or full body portraits |
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 07:23 PM
|
|
Staff
30,735 posts Joined: Jan 2003
|
why suddenly this forum become squashed...must be the stupid sony ad on top.
|
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 07:25 PM
|
|
Junior Member
302 posts Joined: Jul 2010
|
For me Hoya HD is better than XS-Pro in cleaning part ! But i dont mind to choose either one of them , both are good !
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 21 2011, 07:02 PM) Really? But it looks ok on my 50mm f/1.8D though. Ya because f4 i dont wan to get , i wan fast len f2.8 below Haha, initially I went with 1635 on D90. Quite regret cause f/4 slow... That time I'm used to f/2.8 on my 70200 suddenly f/4 :S. A bit pekcek LOL. Of course, there's many old lens still in production anyway thank you for sharing ya ! i think i will pekchek like u because i also used to f2.8 below . This post has been edited by bbuser91: Feb 21 2011, 07:27 PM |
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 07:26 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,676 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: LiTtLe BiG pL@NeT
|
QUOTE(Everdying @ Feb 21 2011, 07:23 PM) why suddenly this forum become squashed...must be the stupid sony ad on top. i realized that also ... i thought my browser got zoom or magnification problems ... |
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 07:26 PM
|
Junior Member
23 posts Joined: Jun 2009 From: Penang 
|
guys.. wanted to ask.. bout d3100.. this model dun have af motor...
bt izzit able to use the af-s lens? plan wanted to grab this... izzit a gud deal for starter? |
|
|
Feb 21 2011, 07:29 PM
|
|
Senior Member
1,676 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: LiTtLe BiG pL@NeT
|
QUOTE(rayne90 @ Feb 21 2011, 07:26 PM) guys.. wanted to ask.. bout d3100.. this model dun have af motor... yup ... can use with all AF-S lens plus its a good beginner body to start off with ...bt izzit able to use the af-s lens? plan wanted to grab this... izzit a gud deal for starter? |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: |  0.0178sec
 0.34
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 09:53 PM |
Quote