Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
3 Pages  1 2 3 >Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V5, Anticipating D700 replacement !

views
     
bbuser91
post Feb 16 2011, 02:27 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
Starting to fund for D400 ! wub.gif

QUOTE(kakisemut @ Feb 16 2011, 02:09 PM)
nope...
im just want opinion....
if not ok...
i will funding for the battery...
*
I suggest you save your money first then get the original one , later 3rd party battery goes wrong , then dont blame the battery suck that time.

No choice just only go for 3rd party. (No choice mean no original product like BG for nikon d3100 then you have to buy 3rd party , example.)


QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 16 2011, 01:54 PM)
IIRC la. I saw certain brand BG using wireless remote as the trigger from BG.
*
Hopefully no IR for D3100 sad.gif

bbuser91
post Feb 16 2011, 07:14 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(General_Nic @ Feb 16 2011, 03:57 PM)
like i said, D3100 dun even have a IR receiver on d body grip like D3000/D60/D90, how to have IR BG?  sweat.gif
*
Alright =) blush.gif



QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Feb 16 2011, 02:41 PM)
BG in D3100 totally troublesome. I think I will be in D7000 or something by then.  sweat.gif
*
Why troublesome?

I was thinking D7000 but i think i want to get D400 if there is any.
bbuser91
post Feb 17 2011, 12:03 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(ezrasang @ Feb 16 2011, 09:15 PM)
RM6100 to be exact. Wait for D800 then, price of D700 will surely drop  cool.gif
*
RM6020 i asked d .

Ezrasang , your fastpack bag can carry tripod along or not?


QUOTE(Andy214 @ Feb 16 2011, 11:50 PM)
Not saying good or bad ISO performance, just that previously you mentioned you notice NO noise/grain and cannot tell difference with ISO 100. Now, this picture at this size, the noise/gain is noticeable and you can see it affected some of the details; Not that I'm complaining or anything, I'm just highlighting because of what you mentioned before.

As for the noise, most important is to get a properly exposed picture; If you're limited to the aperture and shutter speed, then you have no choice to increase the ISO (unless you use flash); it's better than if you underexpose, which will be worst.
*
Ya , i can see there is NOISE even u dont zoom
bbuser91
post Feb 17 2011, 01:16 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(ezrasang @ Feb 17 2011, 12:11 AM)
Cannot carry any tripod, no slot for it also  vmad.gif  mad.gif
*
Oh okay hahaha =D thanks for clarifying.

Vertex is good but out of my budget sad.gif can put laptop and tripod


bbuser91
post Feb 17 2011, 12:33 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(kathlynn @ Feb 17 2011, 12:20 PM)
hi all! need a lil opinion here. i a newbie at PG, and have a basic D5000 with 18-55mm vr lens for about a year now. i think its bout time to get my lonely camera some new lens. prob is, i have no idea what to get next.  with ltd budget, ive narrowed down to

vr 70-300mm
vr 55-300mm
vr 55-200mm

any suggestion/opinion on this? or alt lens that i shud get? big thanks!
*
70-300 all the time for me =) !

50-300mm slow focusing , you need practice more to get accurate and sharp if you wan capture wildlife and sport .

what i mean slow focusing is slower than 70-300mm

http://mansurovs.com/nikon-70-300mm-vr-review/all/1
http://mansurovs.com/nikon-55-300mm-vr-review

i was thinking to get 55-300mm last time , it is a good and affordable len but not what i want , i going to 70-300mm but of course lar 70-200mm better !


Added on February 17, 2011, 12:36 pm
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 17 2011, 11:32 AM)
Frame wise yes XS-Pro is slimmer than Hoya HD.

pikipiki, I have both HD and XS-Pro on my lens, I don't think it is harder to put the cap on XS-Pro as compared to HD.
*
+1 thumbup.gif

This post has been edited by bbuser91: Feb 17 2011, 12:36 PM
bbuser91
post Feb 17 2011, 12:40 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(iXora.ix @ Feb 17 2011, 12:38 PM)
err, 70300 doesn't have motor rite?
if he own d90/d7000/motor body,sure 70-300are the choice  tongue.gif
*
got AF-S -.-
bbuser91
post Feb 17 2011, 01:02 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(kathlynn @ Feb 17 2011, 12:44 PM)
price is too high for my lil pocket! even 70-300mm oso i need to think 3-4 times! haha! smile.gif


Added on February 17, 2011, 12:45 pm

yup!
*
Ohhh hahah

but you stated 70300 is one your option so i mah suggest you lo =D


bbuser91
post Feb 17 2011, 01:51 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
Guy what do you guy think about 17-55mm f2.8g , it is without VR , or nikon purposely make it w/o VR because the f2.8 so we can gain more shutter speed?

Teach me thanks ! thinking to get that
bbuser91
post Feb 17 2011, 02:05 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
17-55mm f2.8 got OOF

QUOTE(maumau @ Feb 17 2011, 02:03 PM)
guys... he said izzit because the big aperture f2.8 can gain more shutter speed...  
why all say without VR
*
Haha maumau , only you can understand me lol !! hahaha

This post has been edited by bbuser91: Feb 17 2011, 02:06 PM
bbuser91
post Feb 17 2011, 02:16 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Feb 17 2011, 02:07 PM)
laugh.gif  bigger aperture gain longer shutter speed? What the......
*
zzzzz

i mean is it because it make it to f2.8 so we can boost up abit shutter speed , i dont mean wide aperture can gain longer shutter speed , sweat .

lol u guy better ignore me , my english suck i dont know how to explain what i mean .



This post has been edited by bbuser91: Feb 17 2011, 02:18 PM
bbuser91
post Feb 17 2011, 02:27 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Feb 17 2011, 02:23 PM)
the f2.8 generally help you to shoot in low light situation, yes if you mean boost as in reducing the shutter speed.
But why not get the 24-70 and so that next time you can use it on a FX body?
It's not worth the money IMO to spend so much on a DX lens.
there's the siggy 17-50 which is cheaper if you're looking for f2.8.


Added on February 17, 2011, 2:25 pm

Me too, but may be he wants to cover the wide ends too. I would never spend so much on DX.
Get the 24-70 and eat bread everyday to save for a FX body.  laugh.gif


Added on February 17, 2011, 2:26 pm

reviews from ken rockwell?
take it with a pinch of salt.
*
I will get 24-70mm when i got FX body but not now

ya i was thinking tamron , sigma , and nikon . wonder which is suit for DX

i need faster focus
bbuser91
post Feb 17 2011, 02:32 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Feb 17 2011, 02:29 PM)
24-70 on DX body also geng lar..
no need FX if you go FX it will be almost like 17-55 perspective. tongue.gif
all my lenses are DX lenses  cry.gif
*
Not about the problem geng or not geng ,

is about the coverage you want and the aperture , fast len


Added on February 17, 2011, 2:33 pm
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Feb 17 2011, 02:31 PM)
f2.8 doesn't mean anything about focusing speed.
if you mean you want a 17-50/55 f2.8 with faster focus I think the siggy & nikon is faster than tamron.
and all three 17-50/55 is for DX.
if you got the money and you don't mind it's a DX lens then just go with the nikon. Siggy and tamron all have quality issue especially after 1 or 2 years.
*
Ic ... thanks you

This post has been edited by bbuser91: Feb 17 2011, 02:33 PM
bbuser91
post Feb 17 2011, 02:47 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(edwardgsk @ Feb 17 2011, 02:41 PM)
Right now 24-70's lens barrel is just nice to hold(go try it at nikon centre if you don't believe) tongue.gif . If it's built with VR, sure become much fatter and not sexy already. tongue.gif

Okay. The real reason behind is probably nikon thinks 24-70 is a "FX-specialized" lens, whereas all nikon FX already have awesome ISO noise performance right, therefor putting a VR in 24-70 is just "lebih" tongue.gif
*
Noted !

Any one can suggest a good wide angle len on DX?
bbuser91
post Feb 17 2011, 03:33 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Feb 17 2011, 02:49 PM)
12-24 f4? or 10-24 f3.5-4.5
Bro, you strike lottery recently? laugh.gif
Can share some of your fortune?  rclxms.gif


Added on February 17, 2011, 2:51 pm

Nano coating helps to reduce flare and ghosting
But on certain lens with nano still pretty weak to flare
*
If i got fortune i wont share out to you (i know u also joking lar so i am )

i will give all to charity =)
bbuser91
post Feb 17 2011, 03:52 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Feb 17 2011, 03:39 PM)
After got, buy D3s D700 D3x all the gold ring 3x sb-900, one lambo one ferrari one mansion and the balance for charity.  laugh.gif


Added on February 17, 2011, 3:41 pm

Who? that bro?  laugh.gif
He seems to have some deep pocket now, surely he can afford good lenses.
*
Haiya KTCY just say only ar , no point to anyone .

I dont have deep resources.

I wont buy ferrari lar , i m not the guy born here to enjoy my life. I will buy a good car who allow me to long drive can d.

I use my camera to learn and shoot more pics , hope can use the pic to touch ppl heart and realized something , eg, there is alot Vietnam kids who cannot afford their study fees , their study fees just only RM5. I buy camera to shoot them , the real face and the happening around the world. We are in malaysia , we should appreciate always , and if we got extra , try to spare some to the people who poorer than us.

I am looking wide-angle len because i want to learn to be photojournalist w/o salary. so i want to ask only , what i know is most of the photojournalist use wide angle to shoot their subject , use wide angle step forward to close to their subject and shoot, but most of us use the wide-angle len step back to shoot. (but also got 70200 lar )

That is me lar, dont shoot me if i say something wrong. again my english very suck lo


QUOTE(razuryza @ Feb 17 2011, 03:36 PM)
humble talk before got.. after got?  whistling.gif  laugh.gif
*
Not humble lar.

This is what i think only.

This post has been edited by bbuser91: Feb 17 2011, 03:54 PM
bbuser91
post Feb 18 2011, 04:15 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(stsh90 @ Feb 18 2011, 04:08 PM)
Heading to Langkawi soon with some friends for a few days. Wondering if I should bring along my tripod?
*
YES !! must bring , man otherwise you will regret

Oh ya , if you still P lesen , remember bring sticker go to stick on ur rental car , and fasten ur seat always , ada polis scouting always.

where are you stay? recommend you stay at pantai cenang there

Remember bring filter

This post has been edited by bbuser91: Feb 18 2011, 04:17 PM
bbuser91
post Feb 18 2011, 04:39 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(razuryza @ Feb 18 2011, 04:38 PM)
u all so terer la.. can differentiate bokeh classes notworthy.gif
*
Not all is him ><"
bbuser91
post Feb 18 2011, 05:03 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(razuryza @ Feb 18 2011, 04:56 PM)
always shot wide open how to get? laugh.gif


Added on February 18, 2011, 4:57 pmand.. its not hexagon. it's heptagon
*
LOL laugh.gif
bbuser91
post Feb 18 2011, 05:27 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Feb 18 2011, 05:16 PM)
hmm.gif
Okay. will try.
*
Lol of how to get if always shoot at wide open.

Btw, i got something to share with you , and i still rmb u want to know about the panning

Sources from Digital Photography School.
user posted image

bbuser91
post Feb 18 2011, 07:22 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
302 posts

Joined: Jul 2010
QUOTE(aldosoesilo @ Feb 18 2011, 05:34 PM)
thumbup.gif
well.. in fact I don't always shoot at wide open bro. I've been at f8. tongue.gif
don't simply jump into the conclusion.

thanks for the share.
*
I did not say u shoot at wide open haha

i Lol at razur statement sweat.gif

3 Pages  1 2 3 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0193sec    0.70    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 12th December 2025 - 06:26 AM