Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V5, Anticipating D700 replacement !

views
     
Everdying
post Feb 16 2011, 11:23 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(faareast @ Feb 16 2011, 11:17 PM)
user posted image

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
this is the best i can crop since u chopped out the hand already..
*
if the hand is already chopped, then crop off the hand and go tighter.
this way also u get rid of the irritating guy in the background.
Attached Image
Everdying
post Feb 16 2011, 11:30 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(vearn27 @ Feb 16 2011, 10:25 PM)
Can we talk a bit about bag here other than only body and lens? unsure.gif

Since it's Nikon fans thread, we can share what bag we used to keep our beloved DSLR in safe tongue.gif

Any recommendation for sling bags within RM100~RM200++ budget?
*
most of the time i use a lowepro passport sling, brand new around RM230, its just enough for body + 1 moderate lens.
u can put another lens in but outside the padded internal area.
Everdying
post Feb 17 2011, 09:07 AM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(Worms @ Feb 17 2011, 05:43 AM)
Hi, i'm newbie in DSLR camera and plan to buy Nikon D3100. I need some advice before i buy it. My main use on this camera is landscape and portrait picture, hence I plan to buy 2 more lens which are

1. Nikon 55-200mm f/4-5.6G ED IF AF-S DX VR Nikkor Zoom Lens
2. Nikon 35mm f/1.8G AF-S DX Lens

Do you think these lens are reasonable choices? Is external flash a necessary to have?
*
imo, if u want wide stick to your kit lens.
if u want long, get the 70-300mm VR instead, price will come up to around the same as both those lenses combined.
Everdying
post Feb 17 2011, 12:24 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
doesnt the entry level viewfinder show info such as shutter / aperture / iso?

Everdying
post Feb 17 2011, 05:31 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
17-55/2.8 on DX, just go get it USED.
can get for around rm3.3k, go SG can find more ppl selling them used.
the lens will obviously hold its used price pretty well even after a few yrs, so once u want to sell off to upgrade u wont lose much.

24-70 on DX is still too tight, dont even talk about landscape.
try shooting large group shots of ppl or more...difference is not like 1 step back...but as much as 3-4 steps back...and most of the time that is space u dont have.
Everdying
post Feb 18 2011, 11:57 AM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
or cheaper still get nikon 28-200 tongue.gif
Everdying
post Feb 18 2011, 04:53 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(gnome @ Feb 18 2011, 03:13 PM)
Btw is it possible to get 80200 two touch below 3k used? hmm.gif
*
shashinki sold a couple of used two touch AF-D before for rm2350 and rm2450.

Everdying
post Feb 18 2011, 05:00 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(gnome @ Feb 18 2011, 04:58 PM)
laugh.gif
Really? not bad price there brows.gif

Hmmm...maybe i should pay a visit to YL camera hmm.gif
*
yea, but on avg most AF-D are rm3k.

why not interested in the push pull AF-D?
Everdying
post Feb 18 2011, 07:31 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(gnome @ Feb 18 2011, 05:45 PM)
Never use a push pull lens before laugh.gif
*
u should go try.
ppl say the push pull AF-D is about maybe 20% slower in focusing than the two touch AF-D.
but i doubt many can really notice it, also of cos depends what body u put it on.
of cos main reason to try it is 2nd hand can get rm1.8k tongue.gif
Everdying
post Feb 20 2011, 09:19 AM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 20 2011, 09:16 AM)
My pc never off. So the notification come out I just click.
Just went thru some of the post and found out his post really sleep.gif
And this one lagi funny.

user posted image
*
lol, hi arrogant uncivilized gay tongue.gif


btw, anyone going to this?
1st 3 days are free entry...
so if anyone going, wonder can borrow their 70-200 try try tongue.gif

user posted image
Everdying
post Feb 20 2011, 11:08 AM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(riz50 @ Feb 20 2011, 10:58 AM)
its women's tennis bro. 70200 not enuf mad.gif
u need more mm  brows.gif
*
i using D7000 la...so 200mm on DX is almost long enough...else i just drag out my 70-300VR.

QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 20 2011, 10:59 AM)
I'm a tennis fan, been playing for years. But then haven't shoot a competition before mainly because before photography my hobby was tennis... after started photography seldom play tennis LOL.

But the first 3 days -> weekdays! Haih, can't go sad.gif
*
lol.
i havent really played tennis for a long time, ever since bad boy mcenroe retired biggrin.gif
most of the time was playing squash instead...but now too lazy also.


Added on February 20, 2011, 11:22 amohh sania mirza is going to be at the bmw open...
jelena dokic too... biggrin.gif


This post has been edited by Everdying: Feb 20 2011, 11:22 AM
Everdying
post Feb 21 2011, 04:50 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(iXora.ix @ Feb 21 2011, 04:03 PM)
aha, the 55-300 lens wont cost you more than 1k. someone if lucky, free filter ^^

or u can also use 55300 plus teleconverter, but not recommended
*
ummm 55-300 can use teleconverter? u sure?

Everdying
post Feb 21 2011, 06:25 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
blah, stupid hoya hmc filter...it softens my images a bit.
Everdying
post Feb 21 2011, 06:31 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
nikon 6mm f/2.8 tongue.gif
Everdying
post Feb 21 2011, 07:06 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 21 2011, 07:02 PM)
Really? But it looks ok on my 50mm f/1.8D though.
On a telephoto can tell got small difference.
Its like finer detail has a slight haze over it.
Got someone on dpreview forum who also complain same thing.

here - http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat...87&changemode=1
same lens, same filter, same prob tongue.gif

his samples all gone already, but i got some of my own.

This post has been edited by Everdying: Feb 21 2011, 07:11 PM
Everdying
post Feb 21 2011, 07:15 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 21 2011, 07:13 PM)
So lousy meh... lucky I didn't use HMC for my 70200 or 85 then phew.
*
wat u using on 70200?
Everdying
post Feb 21 2011, 07:23 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
why suddenly this forum become squashed...must be the stupid sony ad on top.
Everdying
post Feb 21 2011, 10:18 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(wadever @ Feb 21 2011, 10:05 PM)
just read the thread on filters degrading images.
so how many of you DO NOT use filter?

Im using a Hoya HMC UV on my 70300VR.
should I switch it with my B+W UV-Haze filter or just go naked? tongue.gif
*
i suggest u dont use the hoya hmc on the 70-300vr, im using that same combo...or at least i was...now no more.
here are the 100% crop samples i shot this evening.
i took a few shots with filter, and few without filter of the same spot to make sure its consistent.
i guess the differences should be obvious.

with filter.
Attached Image Attached Image

w/o filter.
Attached Image Attached Image

This post has been edited by Everdying: Feb 21 2011, 10:18 PM
Everdying
post Feb 21 2011, 10:23 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(wadever @ Feb 21 2011, 10:22 PM)
reaffirm me.
without filter is sharper? are they on the 300mm end?

I guess I have to do some test shot one day
*
well yea, thats why its now naked.
and yea, fully zoomed at 300mm.
Everdying
post Feb 22 2011, 08:50 AM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(FaezFarhan @ Feb 21 2011, 11:56 PM)
Guys, are the old fixed aperture telephoto nikkor lens reliable? Like 80-200mm f2.8. Which version is decent enough? Or better get the third party ones? Sharpness, bokeh & etc

Thinking of selling my 50mm f1.4 & 55-200mm for it. Rarely used the 50mm lens coz it's only sharp when going above f/2 (at least for my eyes).

hmm.gif
*
the starting point for the 80-200 would be the AF-D one ring version, around rm1.8k used.
after that i would jump straight to the 80-200 AF-S two touch...about rm4k used, ignoring the 80-200 AF-D two touch which sits in the middle of those two somewhere.

QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 22 2011, 07:00 AM)
get 35mm f/2 la sharp at f/2. That's the reason I sold off 50mm 1.4 way back then smile.gif
80-200 is sharp but lack of VR tongue.gif
*
real men dont need VR flex.gif

2 Pages  1 2 >Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.3337sec    0.57    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 07:38 AM