AF-S 14-24mm f2.8
14mm is still can consider ultra wide on DX

Pro1d just like normal UV filter.
the pl-cir are Polarizing filter

---

Added on February 21, 2011, 5:32 pmoh yeah..most of fx lens dont have autofocus motor, so need focus manually

This post has been edited by iXora.ix: Feb 21 2011, 05:32 PM

Harder comparing to Hoya HD. Those tiny particles like grainy tiny dusts hard to blow off.

dat one is quite expansive...
plan to sell of my 24-70 & den get a UWA now...

This post has been edited by Str33tBoY: Feb 21 2011, 05:39 PM

i see. hoya hd also look sexy through ^^

most fx lens dont have AF motor? U SURE? this is 2011 and not 90s. Most Nikon FX lenses currently in production have AF motor. SWM motor to be exact.


The only downside to normal consumers are that these lenses are mostly expensive.

Didnt know there are normal and abnormal consumer

If you wanna use for both DX & FX - I would really recommend 1635 f4. can still use normal type filters unlike 1424.

If you wanna use for DX only - Tokina 1116 f2.8, Sigma 1020 f3.5. I never tried any nikon DX ultrawides yet..so cannot comment on them.

---

Added on February 21, 2011, 5:57 pmme too..never heard of that.. lucky u came up with one..

Ever heard of prosumer?


This post has been edited by alpha_company: Feb 21 2011, 05:57 PM

Tokina 11-16 or Nikkor 14-24
SIgma 12-24 also not bad.
Others, forget about it

Nikon 1635 not gd...?
as it kinda make up my mind adi...
i like d zoom range coverage...
as big aperature is not a need for me...

dont take his word seriously...

Use on FF good. On DX not that wide lo

The nikon 1635 is a great performer. It would be 24mm on DX which is wide enuf for me personally, plus u can use it on FX.

I visit KL bird park with 18105 last year with my friends, on the way back went to pick up a 70200 VRII after the bird park LOL! Damn impulsive cause I shoot bird like shooting landscape at 105mm lol~ Somemore that time VR2 just out and another friend got it and started poisoning me non stop. Damn.

I won't even look at those 2 brands to be honest

Compared to Hoya HD, yes! Tougher to clean.

All new lens have AF-S.

I use 1635 too . I'm a DX user and now an FX user. Was thinking to grab the 1750 or rather the 1755, ended up with 1635 cause I know I will be going for FX.

blah, stupid hoya hmc filter...it softens my images a bit.

tokina 12-24 good ma bro?
funding for that.
or siggy 8-16?
10-20?

nikon 6mm f/2.8

instead of the Tokina 12-24 might as well go for the Tokina 11-16 since you already have the 18-70 to cover the range ...



no regrets ...

This post has been edited by eddy230379: Feb 21 2011, 06:35 PM

11-16 tokina or 10-20 sigma bro?
or 8-16 sigma? pening.
not going to grab it this fast anyway.
will be july maybe
but 11-16 doesn't that feel like prime?
the zoom range is 5mm only

doesnt feel like a prime to me ... but i mostly use it at 11mm ... plus the constant f/2.8 is good ...