Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 22 23 24 25 26 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V4, Anticipating D700 replacement !

views
     
alvinX
post Jan 27 2011, 09:47 PM

tHe l0SeR
******
Senior Member
1,041 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 27 2011, 01:48 PM)
At 300mm is f/5.6? or f/6.3?  ohmy.gif
*
6.3......

QUOTE(celciuz @ Jan 27 2011, 07:22 PM)
user posted image

Bokeh? biggrin.gif
*


stop posting same picture all the time pls... >< especially from 85G one...

This post has been edited by alvinX: Jan 27 2011, 09:48 PM
celciuz
post Jan 27 2011, 09:57 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
14,037 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
^

user posted image

VRII perhaps?
faareast
post Jan 27 2011, 10:21 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: shah alam


guys, please choose between 80-200 and 70-200... and state ur reason... appreciate ur input..
TSKTCY
post Jan 27 2011, 10:31 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
80-200 and you have plenty of cash left to get other primes.
70-200 if you think it's really that awesome and one lens can beat other primes tongue.gif
Everdying
post Jan 27 2011, 10:32 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
i also would choose 80-200 since its cheaper...one day la when i get more money tongue.gif

This post has been edited by Everdying: Jan 27 2011, 10:33 PM
Kent3888
post Jan 27 2011, 10:44 PM

:+: ҜễЙΨ ™ © :+:
******
Senior Member
1,333 posts

Joined: May 2009
From: Denai Alam | Kota Damansara |TTDI


I will choose 70-200 n stop buying lens for 2 years, hahaa..... mayb I'm juz poisoned by the number of 70-200 icon_question.gif
faareast
post Jan 27 2011, 10:55 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
483 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: shah alam


or perhaps 70-300? IQ wise?
TSKTCY
post Jan 27 2011, 11:01 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
70-300 sorry la. Rather get 80-200
Everdying
post Jan 27 2011, 11:10 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
70-300 VR is ok la, 2nd hand rm1.5k or less.
focuses faster than the 80-200...unless of cos its two touch version.
low light obviously suffers abit, but then all depends on ur needs.

scotty
post Jan 27 2011, 11:17 PM

THX Certified Conman
Group Icon
Staff
4,380 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: petaling jaya,puchong jaya,pandan jaya,putra jaya



just got my batt grip just now. wuahahahaha. finally
TSKTCY
post Jan 27 2011, 11:18 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Everdying @ Jan 27 2011, 11:10 PM)
70-300 VR is ok la, 2nd hand rm1.5k or less.
focuses faster than the 80-200...unless of cos its two touch version.
low light obviously suffers abit, but then all depends on ur needs.
*
Focus faster ? blink.gif
I find it slow.
Everdying
post Jan 27 2011, 11:21 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(KTCY @ Jan 27 2011, 11:18 PM)
Focus faster ? blink.gif
I find it slow.
*
i tried both with the 80-200 one touch...
another person i know has tried 70-300VR with two touch...says almost the same.
TSKTCY
post Jan 27 2011, 11:32 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
70-300 got one touch ?

One touch = push pull le.
And push pull 80-200 is the lousiest in 80-200 range hmm.gif
push pull cost less than 2k wink.gif
Everdying
post Jan 27 2011, 11:58 PM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(KTCY @ Jan 27 2011, 11:32 PM)
70-300 got one touch ?

One touch = push pull le.
And push pull 80-200 is the lousiest in 80-200 range hmm.gif
push pull cost less than 2k wink.gif
*
umm where did i say 70-300 got one touch?
i say i compare that with 80-200 one touch la...
now if someone somewhere will sell 80-200 AF-S for under rm3k...
TSKTCY
post Jan 28 2011, 12:01 AM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Everdying @ Jan 27 2011, 11:58 PM)
umm where did i say 70-300 got one touch?
i say i compare that with 80-200 one touch la...
now if someone somewhere will sell 80-200 AF-S for under rm3k...
*
That's why I'm asking whether 70-300 got one touch lo. You're saying 70-300 two touch ma sleep.gif
Edit : misread

This is two touch of 80-200, AF-D
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/80200.htm

One touch 80-200, AF
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/80-200mm-f28-af.htm

And AF-S 80-200 isn't the one I'm referring to

This post has been edited by KTCY: Jan 28 2011, 12:04 AM
Everdying
post Jan 28 2011, 12:04 AM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(KTCY @ Jan 28 2011, 12:01 AM)
Sorry. Misread.
This is two touch of 80-200, AF-D
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/80200.htm
*
ya i know, but still more than RM3k 2nd hand tongue.gif
got 1 guy on ftz selling the newer D version for rm3.5k...2mths old with local warranty.
pity tripod collar cannot be removed on that.

gnome
post Jan 28 2011, 12:26 AM

- We game, do you? -
*******
Senior Member
4,925 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
So who's going to IT Fair tomorrow? tongue.gif

Also how much is 2nd hand 80-200mm two touch now days eh? hmm.gif
Everdying
post Jan 28 2011, 01:01 AM

Two is One and One is None.
Group Icon
Staff
30,735 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(gnome @ Jan 28 2011, 12:26 AM)
So who's going to IT Fair tomorrow?  tongue.gif

Also how much is 2nd hand 80-200mm two touch now days eh? hmm.gif
*
i dont think i going.
last weekend before cny, sure jam like *****.
even one utama also jam for last few days, im pretty sure mid valley will be 5x worse.
hkenh
post Jan 28 2011, 03:11 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
384 posts

Joined: Jan 2011
Which lens to buy when buying D7000?
1)kit lens 18-105mm VR
2)tamron 17-50mm f2.8 VC
3)sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 OS HSM Macro
4)others ?

looking for a good all-around lens and focal length is not a problem as I shoot mostly landscape, street photography and portrait. The Sigma 17-50 f2.8 would be better but it's out of my budget.
Tony Stark
post Jan 28 2011, 05:13 AM

Jarvis where are you?
******
Senior Member
1,883 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(hkenh @ Jan 28 2011, 03:11 AM)
Which lens to buy when buying D7000?
1)kit lens 18-105mm VR
2)tamron 17-50mm f2.8 VC
3)sigma 17-70 f2.8-4 OS HSM Macro
4)others ?

looking for a good all-around lens and focal length is not a problem as I shoot mostly landscape, street photography and portrait. The Sigma 17-50 f2.8 would be better but it's out of my budget.
*
take the nikkor 18-200 lor. great allrounder lens thumbup.gif

126 Pages « < 22 23 24 25 26 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0273sec    0.58    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 01:35 PM