Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 119 120 121 122 123 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V4, Anticipating D700 replacement !

views
     
Bliz
post Feb 15 2011, 04:21 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka


QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 15 2011, 04:19 PM)
24G how ? tongue.gif
*
24G colour all same pattern with the latest N coat series lens, be it zoom or primes tongue.gif
pikipiki
post Feb 15 2011, 04:24 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


can always PP the color and the D color is okay to me.
your poison didn't work!!!!!!!! HAHAHA
Andy214
post Feb 15 2011, 04:26 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,308 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(pikipiki @ Feb 15 2011, 03:19 PM)
Have you tried the 1.4D? worth the extra bucks to upgrade?
*
It's about double or more than double the price of 1.8D; Worth or not depends on the person who will be investing in it.
The best is to test out yourself at Nikon BTS, they have the 1.8D, 1.4D and 1.4G; Test out yourself and see/feel the difference and whether its worth to pay for it.

If you're photographer earning $$$, it might be worth to get the G as you will get your return on investment; But if you're a hobbyist or not earning much, then it depends on your budget and how much you're willing to pay,... also, probably how detail-conscious you are? Sometimes, people don't really look/know the details but they just want to get the best there is; If they have the $$$ then it's not a problem, else, they should think more properly whether it's to pay the extra bucks.

Whatever your choice, most important is for your to test out yourself; In the end, it's still just a tool, it depends on your skills and how you utilize it. If one day you found its limitation and wishes to upgrade, I "believe" you can still sell the lens at good price.
Bliz
post Feb 15 2011, 04:26 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka


QUOTE(pikipiki @ Feb 15 2011, 04:24 PM)
can always PP the color and the D color is okay to me.
your poison didn't work!!!!!!!! HAHAHA
*
PP as u wish, it will never have the colour signature of the G lens. That's why i resist to buy 85 1.4D and I sold off my 80-200 right after I have tested the 70-200vr2.... Actually not only the colour is better, everything else i just a little bit or way better compared to the old lens and buying a good lens will last you for a long long time.. Pain once only buy the best whistling.gif

This post has been edited by Bliz: Feb 15 2011, 04:27 PM
pikipiki
post Feb 15 2011, 04:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


QUOTE(Andy214 @ Feb 15 2011, 04:26 PM)
It's about double or more than double the price of 1.8D; Worth or not depends on the person who will be investing in it.
The best is to test out yourself at Nikon BTS, they have the 1.8D, 1.4D and 1.4G; Test out yourself and see/feel the difference and whether its worth to pay for it.

If you're photographer earning $$$, it might be worth to get the G as you will get your return on investment; But if you're a hobbyist or not earning much, then it depends on your budget and how much you're willing to pay,... also, probably how detail-conscious you are? Sometimes, people don't really look/know the details but they just want to get the best there is; If they have the $$$ then it's not a problem, else, they should think more properly whether it's to pay the extra bucks.

Whatever your choice, most important is for your to test out yourself; In the end, it's still just a tool, it depends on your skills and how you utilize it. If one day you found its limitation and wishes to upgrade, I "believe" you can still sell the lens at good price.
*
Thanks!

Am just a hobbyist and want a 85 that can be use wide open without problem. I won't consider the G at all as it is too expensive.
I just want a lens that I know is money well spent and will have me to blame for the bad photos instead of the gear was not up to par and regret later on.

But will try it out at BTS myself to see the difference. thumbup.gif
daze
post Feb 15 2011, 04:32 PM

Enthusiast
*****
Senior Member
857 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


dun hav the luxury to try the trinity G & N.
but certainly. 24-120mm w N have better color contrast than any of my non G & N lenses.

so...who wanna buy my AFD 80-200mm tongue.gif
TSKTCY
post Feb 15 2011, 04:32 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Bliz @ Feb 15 2011, 04:21 PM)
24G colour all same pattern with the latest N coat series lens, be it zoom or primes  tongue.gif
*
That's why it is in my whistling.gif whistling.gif

QUOTE(Bliz @ Feb 15 2011, 04:26 PM)
PP as u wish, it will never have the colour signature of the G lens. That's why i resist to buy 85 1.4D and I sold off my 80-200 right after I have tested the 70-200vr2.... Actually not only the colour is better, everything else i just a little bit or way better compared to the old lens and buying a good lens will last you for a long long time.. Pain once only buy the best  whistling.gif
*
Don't bother those who don't understand why newer technology is better tongue.gif
Andy214
post Feb 15 2011, 04:33 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,308 posts

Joined: Nov 2004


QUOTE(Bliz @ Feb 15 2011, 04:26 PM)
PP as u wish, it will never have the colour signature of the G lens. That's why i resist to buy 85 1.4D and I sold off my 80-200 right after I have tested the 70-200vr2.... Actually not only the colour is better, everything else i just a little bit or way better compared to the old lens and buying a good lens will last you for a long long time.. Pain once only buy the best  whistling.gif
*
70-200mm VR has much noticeable difference from the 80-200mm, the first is thing is weight, then the focusing speed, and with VR.... handheld on close subject with slow shutter speed is possible, and the quality is simply amazing. Continuous focus speed is blazing fast... overall,... really rclxm9.gif
But the price sweat.gif
Bliz
post Feb 15 2011, 04:33 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka


QUOTE(pikipiki @ Feb 15 2011, 04:31 PM)
Thanks!

Am just a hobbyist and want a 85 that can be use wide open without problem. I won't consider the G at all as it is too expensive.
I just want a lens that I know is money well spent and will have me to blame for the bad photos instead of the gear was not up to par and regret later on.

But will try it out at BTS myself to see the difference.  thumbup.gif
*
Lol u go try 85 1.4D and 85 1.4G wide open i am sure u will buy the G lens right away, the D lens is quite soft at 1.4 compared to the G lens laugh.gif
TSKTCY
post Feb 15 2011, 04:33 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Feb 15 2011, 04:31 PM)
Thanks!

Am just a hobbyist and want a 85 that can be use wide open without problem. I won't consider the G at all as it is too expensive.
I just want a lens that I know is money well spent and will have me to blame for the bad photos instead of the gear was not up to par and regret later on.

But will try it out at BTS myself to see the difference.  thumbup.gif
*
As if I'm not hobbyist !
And 1k different expensive meh ? sleep.gif
Can spend 3k for a lens can't spend extra for better ? LMAO.
Anyway, as you like tongue.gif
gnome
post Feb 15 2011, 04:34 PM

- We game, do you? -
*******
Senior Member
4,925 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
QUOTE(daze @ Feb 15 2011, 04:32 PM)
dun hav the luxury to try the trinity G & N.
but certainly. 24-120mm w N have better color contrast than any of my non G & N lenses.

so...who wanna buy my AFD 80-200mm tongue.gif
*
LOL im currently funding to get 80-200mm AFD blush.gif

So someone please buy my tokina! link below laugh.gif
Bliz
post Feb 15 2011, 04:35 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka


QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 15 2011, 04:32 PM)
That's why it is in my whistling.gif whistling.gif
Don't bother those who don't understand why newer technology is better tongue.gif
*
Wait till they have friends with another lens then they compare and regret laugh.gif

QUOTE(Andy214 @ Feb 15 2011, 04:33 PM)
70-200mm VR has much noticeable difference from the 80-200mm, the first is thing is weight, then the focusing speed, and with VR.... handheld on close subject with slow shutter speed is possible, and the quality is simply amazing. Continuous focus speed is blazing fast... overall,... really  rclxm9.gif
But the price  sweat.gif
*
Actually the 80-200 is heavier from what i feel but the specification sheet says otherwise, 70-200vr2 is very well balanced while the 80-200 is very front heavy doh.gif
pikipiki
post Feb 15 2011, 04:35 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


QUOTE(Bliz @ Feb 15 2011, 04:26 PM)
PP as u wish, it will never have the colour signature of the G lens. That's why i resist to buy 85 1.4D and I sold off my 80-200 right after I have tested the 70-200vr2.... Actually not only the colour is better, everything else i just a little bit or way better compared to the old lens and buying a good lens will last you for a long long time.. Pain once only buy the best  whistling.gif
*
woooo, you're one bad fella to be with! laugh.gif
I'm not a pro and not making $$$ with my gears so that little bit difference in color is okay to me.

How much is the G around Klang Valley, think it's gonna be too pain for me! laugh.gif

Talking about telephoto, how about the 70-300? it's cheap and it's quite sharp apparently. rclxm9.gif
TSKTCY
post Feb 15 2011, 04:35 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
I don't trust third party. Period tongue.gif
pikipiki
post Feb 15 2011, 04:36 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 15 2011, 04:33 PM)
As if I'm not hobbyist !
And 1k different expensive meh ? sleep.gif
Can spend 3k for a lens can't spend extra for better ? LMAO.
Anyway, as you like tongue.gif
*
I'm only a boy not yet a man. 1k is a lot to me. laugh.gif

Bliz
post Feb 15 2011, 04:36 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka


QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 15 2011, 04:33 PM)
As if I'm not hobbyist !
And 1k different expensive meh ? sleep.gif
Can spend 3k for a lens can't spend extra for better ? LMAO.
Anyway, as you like tongue.gif
*
Let him regret his purchase later, 1k to me is very little for a lens laugh.gif ... i think u might as well get 1.8D if u fail to see the difference between 1.4D and 1.4G whistling.gif
TSKTCY
post Feb 15 2011, 04:36 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(Bliz @ Feb 15 2011, 04:35 PM)
Wait till they have friends with another lens then they compare and regret  laugh.gif
Actually the 80-200 is heavier from what i feel but the specification sheet says otherwise, 70-200vr2 is very well balanced while the 80-200 is very front heavy  doh.gif
*
Then they will sell and buy again which mean they spend more moolah instead laugh.gif

QUOTE(pikipiki @ Feb 15 2011, 04:35 PM)
woooo, you're one bad fella to be with!  laugh.gif
I'm not a pro and not making $$$ with my gears so that little bit difference in color is okay to me. 

How much is the G around Klang Valley, think it's gonna be too pain for me! laugh.gif

Talking about telephoto, how about the 70-300? it's cheap and it's quite sharp apparently.  rclxm9.gif
*
70-300 sharp meh ? side by side with 70-200 and see whistling.gif
pikipiki
post Feb 15 2011, 04:37 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
273 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 15 2011, 04:35 PM)
I don't trust third party. Period tongue.gif
*
what third party? I mean the nikkor 70-300 laugh.gif not constant aperture of course.


Added on February 15, 2011, 4:38 pm
QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 15 2011, 04:36 PM)
Then they will sell and buy again which mean they spend more moolah instead laugh.gif
70-300 sharp meh ? side by side with 70-200 and see whistling.gif
*
Sharp for the money! hahaha
of course the 70-200 gonna be sharper, but again, I'm just a boy not yet a man! it's almost 3.5k more!

This post has been edited by pikipiki: Feb 15 2011, 04:38 PM
Bliz
post Feb 15 2011, 04:38 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,734 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Melaka


QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 15 2011, 04:36 PM)
Then they will sell and buy again which mean they spend more moolah instead laugh.gif
70-300 sharp meh ? side by side with 70-200 and see whistling.gif
*
Trust me, i learnt my lesson this way cry.gif .. This is why I will never buy the lens i don't want to begin with, straight away to the top laugh.gif
TSKTCY
post Feb 15 2011, 04:38 PM

BumbleBee™
********
All Stars
12,505 posts

Joined: May 2007
From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again
QUOTE(pikipiki @ Feb 15 2011, 04:36 PM)
I'm only a boy not yet a man. 1k is a lot to me. laugh.gif
*
Got bulu already ? whistling.gif

QUOTE(Bliz @ Feb 15 2011, 04:36 PM)
Let him regret his purchase later, 1k to me is very little for a lens  laugh.gif ... i think u might as well get 1.8D if u fail to see the difference between 1.4D and 1.4G  whistling.gif
*
True nod.gif

QUOTE(pikipiki @ Feb 15 2011, 04:37 PM)
what third party? I mean the nikkor 70-300 laugh.gif not constant aperture of course.
*
Who reply to you doh.gif
Perasan doh.gif

126 Pages « < 119 120 121 122 123 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0302sec    0.55    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 05:37 AM