
Bokeh by BlizĀ®, on Flickr
Photography The Official Nikon Discussion thread V4, Anticipating D700 replacement !
|
|
Jan 25 2011, 11:30 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 25 2011, 11:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Jan 25 2011, 11:49 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Jan 26 2011, 08:42 AM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(bbuser91 @ Jan 26 2011, 08:13 AM) Thanks you very much !! The battery test is quite accurate itself, but for more precise results, always use the focus chart and shoot at 45 degree(measure with ruler to make sure that it's really 45degree And if got focus chart , izzit a must to shoot at 45 degree at the focus test chart? |
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 08:49 AM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Jan 27 2011, 08:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 1 2011, 08:41 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(KTCY @ Feb 1 2011, 05:31 AM) And they don't blame themselves for buying low end camera which cost RM 9.90 Lol yeah, buy el cheapo camera and want to complain the focus speed Apparently, the slow focus isn't the lens problem. Is your bloody camera problem. It focus fast enough on D700 and above series. Reason ? Blame Nikon for not giving better AF module in your low end camera |
|
|
Feb 4 2011, 10:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Feb 4 2011, 10:35 AM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Feb 4 2011, 11:46 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Feb 4 2011, 12:23 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Feb 4 2011, 05:56 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Feb 5 2011, 11:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(geekster129 @ Feb 5 2011, 11:28 AM) Anyways, it's ideal for both crop sensor and full frame, so it's a good collection to your library even when you have a full frame body... Can enjoy it even better. The D version will focus faster than the G version, colour wise the G version is slightly better, bokeh wise also G wins hands down... G will be shaper wide open, while the D is soft wide open..In terms of IQ, i can't comment yet. Maybe our sifu here can comment? KTCY? Celciuz? |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 5 2011, 11:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(mint87 @ Feb 5 2011, 11:37 AM) thx for the good brief I for one will take the sigma 50 f/1.4 over the G nikkor just because of the bokeh and better sharpness wide open + i find that the G is too small and doesn't handle well on big body like D700 now u have given me the idea of which one is better coz i saw many people with d700 using the G version |
|
|
Feb 5 2011, 01:35 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Feb 5 2011, 02:41 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Feb 6 2011, 10:32 AM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
|
Feb 6 2011, 11:15 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(Tony Stark @ Feb 6 2011, 10:36 AM) Care to show us some high iso samples 100% crop? QUOTE(celciuz @ Feb 6 2011, 10:41 AM) Lol on camera LCD only, but frm what i see online the noise performance of 5dmarkII is really good as well, almost similar to D700 |
|
|
Feb 6 2011, 12:33 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
QUOTE(Tony Stark @ Feb 6 2011, 12:19 PM) so here it is. i must admit. im very bad at cropping. and the 5d2 got 21mp so it tend to be larger. im sorry for my stupidly cropped yah The D700 seems to be around 1 stop better from the pictures u have posted, well i only use the iso6400 on my d700 for emergency only » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « no pp no watsoever. just change the tripod abit i think n i must admit this is a lousy comparison since im so noob at cropping them. hard to get it straight as for me i think the D700 wins but 5D2 got the bigger resolution anyways, to topup my stupid and lousy comparison there, here's a web that shows the comparison better. scroll it down or just 'find' the word 'crop1'. Cheers! |
|
|
Feb 6 2011, 01:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,734 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Melaka |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0246sec
0.28
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 13th December 2025 - 01:30 AM |