Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
133 Pages « < 118 119 120 121 122 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Sandy Bridge Overclocking V1, 2500K/2600K/2700K | LGA1155 P67.Z68.Z77

views
     
kambing69
post Jan 31 2012, 08:42 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
195 posts

Joined: Nov 2010


QUOTE(stasio @ Jan 31 2012, 09:34 AM)
used?
*
EH wait..... convert to RM + shipping how much?
stasio
post Jan 31 2012, 08:52 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
18,503 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: P.Jaya
QUOTE(kambing69 @ Jan 31 2012, 08:42 PM)
EH wait..... convert to RM + shipping how much?
*
Still 60-65% of price here. rolleyes.gif
Boldnut
post Jan 31 2012, 08:57 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,209 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
hey guys just curious I am starve for single threaded or 2 threaded performance but I am not willing to go higher TDP for my 2500K since the performance of all 4 cores @ 3.3GHz is more than enough to feed my need, so I am sticking 4 cores @ 3.3, but OC in 1-2 core.

Can I leave anything to auto and just adjust the turbo for single and 2 core, even Vcore as auto, how is the vcore in Sandy work? will it increase if I leave it auto when I just adjust the turbo 1 active core @ 4.2Ghz/ dual core ~4GHz? because as far I as know most Sandy can run fair well <4.2GHz @ stock volt.

because previously on socket 775, if I leave it auto the Vcore will increase itself when I OC despite I stay within Stock voltage OC range.

System spec
Intel 2500K
Asus P67 Sabertooth B3
2x4GB Corsair Vengence 1600Mhz CL8 kit
Leaktek GTX570
80GB HDD + 1TB HDD
Xigmatek NRP-MC651 650W PSU

EDIT: besides Any idea how/what application to stress test individual cores? (single core/dual core/triple cores).

This post has been edited by Boldnut: Jan 31 2012, 10:48 PM
1qaz1qaz
post Feb 3 2012, 10:11 PM

What Are You Looking At???!
******
Senior Member
1,894 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
From: Heaven in Hell
hey guys~
if my rig can run 10 intel burn test in (stress level - maximum) without any problem~ does it means stable???
cos i hv no time to run p95 for 24 hours~

This post has been edited by 1qaz1qaz: Feb 3 2012, 10:46 PM
TSowikh84
post Feb 4 2012, 08:37 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(Boldnut @ Jan 31 2012, 08:57 PM)
hey guys just curious I am starve for single threaded or 2 threaded performance but I am not willing to go higher TDP for my 2500K since the performance of all 4 cores @ 3.3GHz is more than enough to feed my need, so I am sticking 4 cores @ 3.3, but OC in 1-2 core.

Can I leave anything to auto and just adjust the turbo for single and 2 core, even Vcore as auto, how is the vcore in Sandy work? will it increase if I leave it auto when I just adjust the turbo 1 active core @ 4.2Ghz/ dual core ~4GHz? because as far I as know most Sandy can run fair well <4.2GHz @ stock volt.

because previously on socket 775, if I leave it auto the Vcore will increase itself when I OC despite I stay within Stock voltage OC range.

System spec
Intel 2500K
Asus P67 Sabertooth B3
2x4GB Corsair Vengence 1600Mhz CL8 kit
Leaktek GTX570
80GB HDD + 1TB HDD
Xigmatek NRP-MC651 650W PSU

EDIT: besides Any idea how/what application to stress test individual cores? (single core/dual core/triple cores).
*

Most SB can do 4.2GHz at stock vcore. afaik In bios u can choose all cores to run at 42X multi hence overwriting the turbo function. i believe the bios can auto adjust the vcore for u nicely. monitor the vcore in windows by tools like realtemp, coretemp, aida etc... IBT/LinX can choose how many threads to stress. otherwise, u may as well disable the core & thread in bios.

QUOTE(1qaz1qaz @ Feb 3 2012, 10:11 PM)
hey guys~
if my rig can run 10 intel burn test in (stress level - maximum) without any problem~ does it means stable???
cos i hv no time to run p95 for 24 hours~
*

hard to say as lots of ppl said they will still get BSOD even though IBT/LinX passed.


1qaz1qaz
post Feb 4 2012, 09:22 AM

What Are You Looking At???!
******
Senior Member
1,894 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
From: Heaven in Hell
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Feb 4 2012, 08:37 AM)
hard to say as lots of ppl said they will still get BSOD even though IBT/LinX passed.
*
how about now?? hv been running p95 for 8+hours~ now error~


Added on February 4, 2012, 9:37 amthan what is the best way yo test is it stable?

This post has been edited by 1qaz1qaz: Feb 4 2012, 09:37 AM
TSowikh84
post Feb 4 2012, 10:32 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(1qaz1qaz @ Feb 4 2012, 09:22 AM)
how about now?? hv been running p95 for 8+hours~ now error~


Added on February 4, 2012, 9:37 amthan what is the best way yo test is it stable?
*
there's no best stress test... error could be bad mem settings etc as well.
when troubleshooting problem like this a screenshot as a proof is required. i don't trust typing lol.
1qaz1qaz
post Feb 4 2012, 10:46 AM

What Are You Looking At???!
******
Senior Member
1,894 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
From: Heaven in Hell
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Feb 4 2012, 10:32 AM)
there's no best stress test... error could be bad mem settings etc as well.
when troubleshooting problem like this a screenshot as a proof is required. i don't trust typing lol.
*
OH SO SRY!!!!! doh.gif doh.gif
typo!! now = no problem~ sry~
Dennos
post Feb 4 2012, 01:13 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,736 posts

Joined: Dec 2006



from my little experience, oc memory will give u bsod most of the time. So, it is better to stick to ori frequency for long run. So far i didnt face any BSOD on cpu ocing.
TSowikh84
post Feb 4 2012, 02:06 PM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(Dennos @ Feb 4 2012, 01:13 PM)
from my little experience, oc memory will give u bsod most of the time. So, it is better to stick to ori frequency for long run. So far i didnt face any BSOD on cpu ocing.
*

+1
must know some rules applied on mem OC. eg.
tFAW must be at least 4*tRRD
tRAS = tCL + tRCD + tRP, not necessary but highly recommended
dopp
post Feb 4 2012, 07:40 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,733 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang



Yay , arrived ! USD169.90 Made in Costa Rica..

Attached Image




QUOTE(stasio @ Jan 31 2012, 08:52 PM)
Still 60-65% of price here.  rolleyes.gif
*
This post has been edited by dopp: Feb 4 2012, 07:41 PM
hahariz
post Feb 4 2012, 07:54 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
222 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
From: Kajang


4.6GHz at 1.37v, not stable. Keep getting x101 error.

Yeah I think I got a shit chip. I'll just settle with 4.2GHz. :\
Dennos
post Feb 4 2012, 08:41 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,736 posts

Joined: Dec 2006



4.6 i think u need i.4v.
hahariz
post Feb 4 2012, 09:02 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
222 posts

Joined: Sep 2010
From: Kajang


It is stable on 1.4 but I've been reading everywhere that people have been running 4.6GHz on 1.35-1.37v.
Boldnut
post Feb 4 2012, 11:17 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,209 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Feb 4 2012, 08:37 AM)
Most SB can do 4.2GHz at stock vcore. afaik In bios u can choose all cores to run at 42X multi hence overwriting the turbo function. i believe the bios can auto adjust the vcore for u nicely. monitor the vcore in windows by tools like realtemp, coretemp, aida etc... IBT/LinX can choose how many threads to stress. otherwise, u may as well disable the core & thread in bios.
*

thanks for replying, so if I leave Vcore at auto will it go over the Intel spec? because as far as I know if it clock higher the Vcore go up as well.

Its not that I fear it will break on overvolt, since I do rather mild OC only, but more like I want power consumption stay max 95w only.

CPU Current Capability = 100% I leave it at 100% whats this thing?

I got aida64, and manage to use its build-in stress test each core, 2 core or 3 core.

My Report biggrin.gif
So far I only got turbo in these frequency without itself clocking back down, because if I go higher it will quickly clock back down after I stress a while.

1. 4GHz turbo when 1 core active.
2. 3.6GHz when 2 cores active.
3. 3.5GHz when 3 cores active.
4. 3.4Ghz when 4 cores active.

seems the turbo function are rather poor, if keep clocking down if I set too high.

Cooler is Hyper 212+ in a non air-cond room at 31c afternoon.
TSowikh84
post Feb 5 2012, 12:43 AM

i7 Clan
Group Icon
Elite
8,711 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan



QUOTE(Boldnut @ Feb 4 2012, 11:17 PM)
thanks for replying, so if I leave Vcore at auto will it go over the Intel spec? because as far as I know if it clock higher the Vcore go up as well.

Its not that I fear it will break on overvolt, since I do rather mild OC only, but more like I want power consumption stay max 95w only.

CPU Current Capability = 100% I leave it at 100% whats this thing?

I got aida64, and manage to use its build-in stress test each core, 2 core or 3 core.

My Report  biggrin.gif
So far I only got turbo in these frequency without itself clocking back down, because if I go higher it will quickly clock back down after I stress a while.

1. 4GHz turbo when 1 core active.
2. 3.6GHz when 2 cores active.
3. 3.5GHz when 3 cores active.
4. 3.4Ghz when 4 cores active.

seems the turbo function are rather poor, if keep clocking down if I set too high.

Cooler is Hyper 212+ in a non air-cond room at 31c afternoon.
*
When you put settings on auto bios will control vCore behaviour based on the speed you set.
High or low is depends on mobo bios. Don't take too much about Intel specs as the actually vCore read by DMM doesn't really tally with what you see in bios/software.

CPU Current Capability: Increases the power threshold before over-current protection limits power (either by shut-off or throttling). If low OC just leave it auto.
Boldnut
post Feb 5 2012, 08:24 AM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
2,209 posts

Joined: Nov 2010
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Feb 5 2012, 12:43 AM)
When you put settings on auto bios will control vCore behaviour based on the speed you set.
High or low is depends on mobo bios. Don't take too much about Intel specs as the actually vCore read by DMM doesn't really tally with what you see in bios/software.

CPU Current Capability: Increases the power threshold before over-current protection limits power (either by shut-off or throttling). If low OC just leave it auto.
*

Thanks again, I guess I need to manually set my Vcore instead of letting it auto to keep my TDP under control. smile.gif

first thing is to find the VID for the chip @ 3.3GHz.
flodder
post Feb 5 2012, 08:33 PM

6 batang ab numb addicted with 6 bintang
******
Senior Member
1,039 posts

Joined: Nov 2007
From: Penang Island Status: No Solidarity No Corruption



QUOTE(hahariz @ Feb 4 2012, 07:54 PM)
4.6GHz at 1.37v, not stable. Keep getting x101 error.

Yeah I think I got a shit chip. I'll just settle with 4.2GHz. :\
*
you getting x101 error? Look 4.2GHz is more stable oOoo
stasio
post Feb 6 2012, 12:41 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
18,503 posts

Joined: Oct 2007
From: P.Jaya
Gigabyte BIOS update:

G1.Sniper2 - F5e
GA-Z68X-UD7-B3 - F10c
GA-Z68X-UD5-B3 - F10d
GA-Z68X-UD4-B3 - F10e
GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3 - F11j
GA-Z68X-UD3P-B3 - F8e
GA-Z68X-UD3R-B3 - F7e
GA-Z68XP-UD5 - F6d
GA-Z68XP-UD3 - F9h
GA-Z68XP-UD3P - F7f
GA-Z68XP-UD3R - F6e
GA-Z68XP-D3 - F8b

GA-P67A-UD7-B3 - F7c
GA-P67A-UD5-B3 - F8c
GA-P67X-UD3-B3 - F8a
GA-P67X-UD3R-B3 - F6e

-03.Feb 12

This post has been edited by stasio: Feb 6 2012, 04:55 PM
Racerx
post Feb 6 2012, 02:58 PM

Tell Your World
*******
Senior Member
8,461 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: Kota Bharu,Kelantan



QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 30 2012, 05:54 PM)
don't know what's the reason behind this but that low GFlops means CPU throttling/ underperformed. could be VRM overheating
turn off all power saving features C1E, C3. C6, EIST
windows power management set to high performance
in LinX set priority to above normal/real time, run all mem
or could be other OC settings failed to work
I'm using Arctic MX4, easier to apply than Tuniq TX4.
*
I've put a spoiler on the 2nd fan of the heatsink so that some air is directed to the VRM below and voila i've got 122GFlops on 4.5GHz.Looks like it really did overheat.Thanks for your help.

133 Pages « < 118 119 120 121 122 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0315sec    0.41    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 07:12 PM