QUOTE(stasio @ Jan 31 2012, 09:34 AM)
EH wait..... convert to RM + shipping how much?Sandy Bridge Overclocking V1, 2500K/2600K/2700K | LGA1155 P67.Z68.Z77
Sandy Bridge Overclocking V1, 2500K/2600K/2700K | LGA1155 P67.Z68.Z77
|
|
Jan 31 2012, 08:42 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
195 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 31 2012, 08:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
18,503 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: P.Jaya |
|
|
|
Jan 31 2012, 08:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,209 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
hey guys just curious I am starve for single threaded or 2 threaded performance but I am not willing to go higher TDP for my 2500K since the performance of all 4 cores @ 3.3GHz is more than enough to feed my need, so I am sticking 4 cores @ 3.3, but OC in 1-2 core.
Can I leave anything to auto and just adjust the turbo for single and 2 core, even Vcore as auto, how is the vcore in Sandy work? will it increase if I leave it auto when I just adjust the turbo 1 active core @ 4.2Ghz/ dual core ~4GHz? because as far I as know most Sandy can run fair well <4.2GHz @ stock volt. because previously on socket 775, if I leave it auto the Vcore will increase itself when I OC despite I stay within Stock voltage OC range. System spec Intel 2500K Asus P67 Sabertooth B3 2x4GB Corsair Vengence 1600Mhz CL8 kit Leaktek GTX570 80GB HDD + 1TB HDD Xigmatek NRP-MC651 650W PSU EDIT: besides Any idea how/what application to stress test individual cores? (single core/dual core/triple cores). This post has been edited by Boldnut: Jan 31 2012, 10:48 PM |
|
|
Feb 3 2012, 10:11 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,894 posts Joined: Jul 2011 From: Heaven in Hell |
hey guys~
if my rig can run 10 intel burn test in (stress level - maximum) without any problem~ does it means stable??? cos i hv no time to run p95 for 24 hours~ This post has been edited by 1qaz1qaz: Feb 3 2012, 10:46 PM |
|
|
Feb 4 2012, 08:37 AM
|
|
Elite
8,711 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan |
QUOTE(Boldnut @ Jan 31 2012, 08:57 PM) hey guys just curious I am starve for single threaded or 2 threaded performance but I am not willing to go higher TDP for my 2500K since the performance of all 4 cores @ 3.3GHz is more than enough to feed my need, so I am sticking 4 cores @ 3.3, but OC in 1-2 core. Most SB can do 4.2GHz at stock vcore. afaik In bios u can choose all cores to run at 42X multi hence overwriting the turbo function. i believe the bios can auto adjust the vcore for u nicely. monitor the vcore in windows by tools like realtemp, coretemp, aida etc... IBT/LinX can choose how many threads to stress. otherwise, u may as well disable the core & thread in bios.Can I leave anything to auto and just adjust the turbo for single and 2 core, even Vcore as auto, how is the vcore in Sandy work? will it increase if I leave it auto when I just adjust the turbo 1 active core @ 4.2Ghz/ dual core ~4GHz? because as far I as know most Sandy can run fair well <4.2GHz @ stock volt. because previously on socket 775, if I leave it auto the Vcore will increase itself when I OC despite I stay within Stock voltage OC range. System spec Intel 2500K Asus P67 Sabertooth B3 2x4GB Corsair Vengence 1600Mhz CL8 kit Leaktek GTX570 80GB HDD + 1TB HDD Xigmatek NRP-MC651 650W PSU EDIT: besides Any idea how/what application to stress test individual cores? (single core/dual core/triple cores). QUOTE(1qaz1qaz @ Feb 3 2012, 10:11 PM) hey guys~ hard to say as lots of ppl said they will still get BSOD even though IBT/LinX passed.if my rig can run 10 intel burn test in (stress level - maximum) without any problem~ does it means stable??? cos i hv no time to run p95 for 24 hours~ |
|
|
Feb 4 2012, 09:22 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,894 posts Joined: Jul 2011 From: Heaven in Hell |
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Feb 4 2012, 08:37 AM) how about now?? hv been running p95 for 8+hours~ now error~Added on February 4, 2012, 9:37 amthan what is the best way yo test is it stable? This post has been edited by 1qaz1qaz: Feb 4 2012, 09:37 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 4 2012, 10:32 AM
|
|
Elite
8,711 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan |
QUOTE(1qaz1qaz @ Feb 4 2012, 09:22 AM) how about now?? hv been running p95 for 8+hours~ now error~ there's no best stress test... error could be bad mem settings etc as well.Added on February 4, 2012, 9:37 amthan what is the best way yo test is it stable? when troubleshooting problem like this a screenshot as a proof is required. i don't trust typing lol. |
|
|
Feb 4 2012, 10:46 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,894 posts Joined: Jul 2011 From: Heaven in Hell |
|
|
|
Feb 4 2012, 01:13 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,736 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
from my little experience, oc memory will give u bsod most of the time. So, it is better to stick to ori frequency for long run. So far i didnt face any BSOD on cpu ocing.
|
|
|
Feb 4 2012, 02:06 PM
|
|
Elite
8,711 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan |
QUOTE(Dennos @ Feb 4 2012, 01:13 PM) from my little experience, oc memory will give u bsod most of the time. So, it is better to stick to ori frequency for long run. So far i didnt face any BSOD on cpu ocing. +1must know some rules applied on mem OC. eg. tFAW must be at least 4*tRRD tRAS = tCL + tRCD + tRP, not necessary but highly recommended |
|
|
Feb 4 2012, 07:40 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,733 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Penang |
|
|
|
Feb 4 2012, 07:54 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Sep 2010 From: Kajang |
4.6GHz at 1.37v, not stable. Keep getting x101 error.
Yeah I think I got a shit chip. I'll just settle with 4.2GHz. :\ |
|
|
Feb 4 2012, 08:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,736 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
4.6 i think u need i.4v.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 4 2012, 09:02 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
222 posts Joined: Sep 2010 From: Kajang |
It is stable on 1.4 but I've been reading everywhere that people have been running 4.6GHz on 1.35-1.37v.
|
|
|
Feb 4 2012, 11:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,209 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Feb 4 2012, 08:37 AM) Most SB can do 4.2GHz at stock vcore. afaik In bios u can choose all cores to run at 42X multi hence overwriting the turbo function. i believe the bios can auto adjust the vcore for u nicely. monitor the vcore in windows by tools like realtemp, coretemp, aida etc... IBT/LinX can choose how many threads to stress. otherwise, u may as well disable the core & thread in bios. thanks for replying, so if I leave Vcore at auto will it go over the Intel spec? because as far as I know if it clock higher the Vcore go up as well. Its not that I fear it will break on overvolt, since I do rather mild OC only, but more like I want power consumption stay max 95w only. CPU Current Capability = 100% I leave it at 100% whats this thing? I got aida64, and manage to use its build-in stress test each core, 2 core or 3 core. My Report So far I only got turbo in these frequency without itself clocking back down, because if I go higher it will quickly clock back down after I stress a while. 1. 4GHz turbo when 1 core active. 2. 3.6GHz when 2 cores active. 3. 3.5GHz when 3 cores active. 4. 3.4Ghz when 4 cores active. seems the turbo function are rather poor, if keep clocking down if I set too high. Cooler is Hyper 212+ in a non air-cond room at 31c afternoon. |
|
|
Feb 5 2012, 12:43 AM
|
|
Elite
8,711 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Butterworth, PG / Machang, Kelantan |
QUOTE(Boldnut @ Feb 4 2012, 11:17 PM) thanks for replying, so if I leave Vcore at auto will it go over the Intel spec? because as far as I know if it clock higher the Vcore go up as well. When you put settings on auto bios will control vCore behaviour based on the speed you set. Its not that I fear it will break on overvolt, since I do rather mild OC only, but more like I want power consumption stay max 95w only. CPU Current Capability = 100% I leave it at 100% whats this thing? I got aida64, and manage to use its build-in stress test each core, 2 core or 3 core. My Report So far I only got turbo in these frequency without itself clocking back down, because if I go higher it will quickly clock back down after I stress a while. 1. 4GHz turbo when 1 core active. 2. 3.6GHz when 2 cores active. 3. 3.5GHz when 3 cores active. 4. 3.4Ghz when 4 cores active. seems the turbo function are rather poor, if keep clocking down if I set too high. Cooler is Hyper 212+ in a non air-cond room at 31c afternoon. High or low is depends on mobo bios. Don't take too much about Intel specs as the actually vCore read by DMM doesn't really tally with what you see in bios/software. CPU Current Capability: Increases the power threshold before over-current protection limits power (either by shut-off or throttling). If low OC just leave it auto. |
|
|
Feb 5 2012, 08:24 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,209 posts Joined: Nov 2010 |
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Feb 5 2012, 12:43 AM) When you put settings on auto bios will control vCore behaviour based on the speed you set. Thanks again, I guess I need to manually set my Vcore instead of letting it auto to keep my TDP under control. High or low is depends on mobo bios. Don't take too much about Intel specs as the actually vCore read by DMM doesn't really tally with what you see in bios/software. CPU Current Capability: Increases the power threshold before over-current protection limits power (either by shut-off or throttling). If low OC just leave it auto. first thing is to find the VID for the chip @ 3.3GHz. |
|
|
Feb 5 2012, 08:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,039 posts Joined: Nov 2007 From: Penang Island Status: No Solidarity No Corruption |
|
|
|
Feb 6 2012, 12:41 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
18,503 posts Joined: Oct 2007 From: P.Jaya |
Gigabyte BIOS update:
G1.Sniper2 - F5e GA-Z68X-UD7-B3 - F10c GA-Z68X-UD5-B3 - F10d GA-Z68X-UD4-B3 - F10e GA-Z68X-UD3H-B3 - F11j GA-Z68X-UD3P-B3 - F8e GA-Z68X-UD3R-B3 - F7e GA-Z68XP-UD5 - F6d GA-Z68XP-UD3 - F9h GA-Z68XP-UD3P - F7f GA-Z68XP-UD3R - F6e GA-Z68XP-D3 - F8b GA-P67A-UD7-B3 - F7c GA-P67A-UD5-B3 - F8c GA-P67X-UD3-B3 - F8a GA-P67X-UD3R-B3 - F6e -03.Feb 12 This post has been edited by stasio: Feb 6 2012, 04:55 PM |
|
|
Feb 6 2012, 02:58 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,461 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Kota Bharu,Kelantan |
QUOTE(owikh84 @ Jan 30 2012, 05:54 PM) don't know what's the reason behind this but that low GFlops means CPU throttling/ underperformed. could be VRM overheating I've put a spoiler on the 2nd fan of the heatsink so that some air is directed to the VRM below and voila i've got 122GFlops on 4.5GHz.Looks like it really did overheat.Thanks for your help.turn off all power saving features C1E, C3. C6, EIST windows power management set to high performance in LinX set priority to above normal/real time, run all mem or could be other OC settings failed to work I'm using Arctic MX4, easier to apply than Tuniq TX4. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0315sec
0.41
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 4th December 2025 - 07:12 PM |