yaya.. smooth auto-focus motor.. but however, still got little sound.. just generally know as in-lens focus motor
SSM is in-lens supersonic focus motor (is fast and quiet)
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V46!, The Orange Legion
Photography The Sony Alpha Thread V46!, The Orange Legion
|
|
Oct 7 2010, 11:09 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,358 posts Joined: Feb 2006 |
yaya.. smooth auto-focus motor.. but however, still got little sound.. just generally know as in-lens focus motor
SSM is in-lens supersonic focus motor (is fast and quiet) |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 7 2010, 11:10 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,753 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
QUOTE(hazril @ Oct 7 2010, 10:21 PM) i think if u try checking 8tvt's siggies,theres some answers to ur questions... muahaha i'm laughing.. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_alpha p/s : dat is one funny siggie u have bro.... yes please click.. |
|
|
Oct 7 2010, 11:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,631 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong |
QUOTE(lwliam @ Oct 7 2010, 10:00 PM) remember to take your adapter from me when you return my filters.....@kiet sorry for keep you waiting..... nice dealing with you..... I'm in the rush to go home & can't really chat much with you.... enjoy your atx 116 |
|
|
Oct 7 2010, 11:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,418 posts Joined: May 2008 From: somewhere somewhere |
|
|
|
Oct 7 2010, 11:29 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,631 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Puchong |
|
|
|
Oct 7 2010, 11:45 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
9,590 posts Joined: Jan 2008 From: S'wak||KL||SG |
QUOTE All Sony DSLRs have Live View, except for Sony Alpha 2xx series. Live View mode features a 1.4x or 2x Smart Teleconverter which digitally zooms in on the subject and reproduces pixels on a 1:1 basis, preventing degradation of picture quality. A100 got LV? |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 7 2010, 11:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,063 posts Joined: Jul 2005 |
Is Sony a560 or a580 is in Malaysia already?
|
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 12:10 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,418 posts Joined: May 2008 From: somewhere somewhere |
|
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 12:12 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
5,886 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: BM |
|
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 12:42 AM
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
QUOTE(wingster @ Oct 7 2010, 06:51 PM) @Albnok & ieR : "1200-zone evaluative segment" ahhh, u are now even more confused. LOL.So far I know thats from the spot metering doesn't it? I can't tell the difference between conventional OVF and Sony LV in terms of sensor accuracy :/ 40-segment Multi Segment, Center-weighted, Spot; (1200 zone evaluative metering in Live View) metering has 3 mode. i) multi metering (or all zone metering, or wide metering, other brand will name it differently but its the same) ii) center weighted metering (this take a small area of the middle zone, best for portraiture of subject in the middle where it will ignore strong backlight around the corners) iii) spot metering (take 1 segment only, of ur AF point, this is the only metering that can move around... logically, wide/multi mean all segment, it can move, center weighted is CENTER weighted, so Spot is the only metering can move around and meter according to the selected point.) sony uses 40 "honey comb shape" boxes, to evaluate the exposure. how? (actually i dunno the actual value) it take reading from each of the 40 segment, and get the AVERAGE(balanced EV) out of it, and calculate the setting to shoot. it works the same way with 1200 zone metering. just that, with more 'zone/segment' the averaged unit is more accurate then just 40 segment. hence, when u shoot are with light source (light bulb) the 40segment sometimes will goes underexpose to control the light thinking it was overexposed. while 1200zone will detect more accurate metering by having more meter to average, it will have more balanced because it calculate better of how much did the lightsource overexposed the segment. but the weakness of the 40segment is also due to it uses penta mirror, if its penta prism, i believe its much better and the prism are brighter then the mirror. go and try it out conventional OVF is just OVF. sony "quick" LV is diff from conventional LV. But, sony MF LV check is actually, same as conventional LV (or works the same way) jsut that, it wont try to AF when the mirror comes down. how QuickLV focus is, the Mirror stay there like in OVF Mode. the mirror box is untouch or unaltered. it still reflect the image upward to the OVF area.... its just the OVF area of A300 (or any model that has QLV) is using Penta Mirror instead of Penta Prism, you will notice there model has much smaller OVF. the penta mirror is tilted slightly, reflecting the image from the Main Mirror below, into the QLV capturing sensor. now, since the mirror box is unaltered, mean the AF module is still intact and able to still uses Phase Detection. hence with QLV, u still get fast AF then other conventional that, they need to Lift up the Main mirror, making the AF module below unable to work. |
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 12:46 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,063 posts Joined: Jul 2005 |
Didn't like a33 and a55 as it battery not good enough and don't even have battery grip...
Waiting fo a560/a580 or just get back to a550 |
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 12:58 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,633 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: www.kelvinchiew.com |
wanna ask..i read review the tamron 10-24 heard alot compplains on soft ah??? i wonder if i get it will i encounter that issue?? anyone any review and poison.. i am liking it only for its range..else will go for sigma f3.5 10-20 though...
also damn hard to find uwa prices around worr |
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 01:00 AM
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
QUOTE(destfull @ Oct 8 2010, 12:46 AM) Didn't like a33 and a55 as it battery not good enough and don't even have battery grip... yo, i advise A560/580 no matter what. its a A550 replacement.Waiting fo a560/a580 or just get back to a550 i) 15 af point ii) HELL LOT faster AF detection and lock iii) i heard from insider who tested A55 for a whole week, it focus marvelous in Pub, so i guess the A560/80 has better more sensitive night shooting. as a photographer, u know those top 3 thing is more important then iso, megapixel or grip. Added on October 8, 2010, 1:02 am QUOTE(porkchop @ Oct 8 2010, 12:58 AM) wanna ask..i read review the tamron 10-24 heard alot compplains on soft ah??? i wonder if i get it will i encounter that issue?? anyone any review and poison.. i am liking it only for its range..else will go for sigma f3.5 10-20 though... it is soft when u zoom in to 100% (friend send me samples) at F3.5, but the sharpness is okay at F5.6 and better at F8.also damn hard to find uwa prices around worr but if u resize the 10mp photo to 50% (5mp is still huge photo), it is tack sharp This post has been edited by ieR: Oct 8 2010, 01:02 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 01:07 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
6,633 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: www.kelvinchiew.com |
ooo okie....well sometimes only use zoom in, but what if display on a 32" sony lcd tv ah? can see it soft ah?? damn looks like no choice have to get a smaller range lens lo
|
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 01:28 AM
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
well, 32inch, if u dont zoom it, viewed on (let say fullHF) 1920x1080, thats hardly even 3mp... so 10mp scale down to 3mp, its compressing the pixel by 3 times, sure is VERY sharp lo
|
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 01:29 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,106 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
joke for the day, saw a post
[WTB] Sony hvl-f42am flash Rm250 and below.. |
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 01:33 AM
|
|
Elite
3,928 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Incheon, Korea.. currently in Miri, Soviet Sarawak |
i think he typo for HVL F20.... hahahaha...
rm250, he looking for a broken one har? |
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 01:50 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
111 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: MELAKA |
|
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 02:01 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,106 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
|
|
|
Oct 8 2010, 02:01 AM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
111 posts Joined: Nov 2009 From: MELAKA |
QUOTE(albnok @ Oct 7 2010, 11:23 AM) freaky_deity: Good idea! Minolta 100mm F2.8 macro lens vs Sigma 105mm F2.8 macro which is better?Cheaper and better macro? No, not for insects. Anything better is more expensive, and anything cheaper isn't better. The Tamron 90mm F2.8 is popular, but you get a shorter working distance, which means you have to be nearer to the subject at 1:1. This does not help when shooting insects! Better is the Sigma/Tamron 180mm F3.5 Macro - you can be a lot further from the insect at 1:1, but it is not cheaper! The cheapest macro is the Sony 30mm F2.8 DT SAM Macro, but this is for closeups of small objects and fine details, not insects, as it gives a normal angle of view. Very suitable for product shots. The Sigma (or Sony) 50mm F2.8 Macro is meant for full-frame due to its angle of view. The 28-300mm is not a real macro but you can buy it for the range. I would prefer the Sony 18-250mm F3.5-6.3 DT. |
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0176sec
0.56
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 3rd December 2025 - 01:57 PM |