QUOTE(ieR @ Sep 20 2010, 05:45 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
evilhomura89: there is a lot of time, and reviews (even canon and nikon body review) when writing pros and cons, the writer sometimes seem to have nothing else to write about the cons, they start finding micro faults or (very)personal opinion to write.
pros, good WL ability, then con, lack of flash control? what does it means? (i am pretty sure he is trying to compare with D90/7000 in body commander mode).
* No in camera editing for still or video at all
* No art filters or fun effects
i LOL at this, even they have it, i doubt i ever will use it either. will you? and so on, time to time, u have to learn to read the cons, or even the pros (which sometimes misleads) and filter/understand the whole picture of the camera

QUOTE(wingster @ Sep 20 2010, 05:56 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
The cons doesn't bother if you're more intend to still photos instead of DSLR Cinematography or serious sports Photography
The IQ is almost the same as A550 and I didn't notice the big difference
What I really know the CON's for A33/A55 is the battery life is short, limited control on maximum burst speed and video and also some overheating issue if you use Movie Mode during SSS ON often.
For size whether you like small or big camera, if you want big camera go for A550/A560/A580, if you want smaller and lighter camera without concern about the battery grip add ons just head for A33/A55
Anyway things will end up a final decision when you touch and try the camera and compare, only from there you will know the difference and whats the camera you like.
Thanks for the useful replies. I guess I'll have to visit SonyStyle to play with it.
All I wanted to get is my first DSLR that I won't regret and won't be upgrading for the next few years (5 years at least i think). Without sufficient experiences, choosing the right one can be quite hard for me as I'm not exactly sure of what I want and need.
I can't deny that the a33/55 is way to attractive with it's innovative features and not to mention that Sony did invest alot in marketing for this line. Being able to hit 7/10fps is a plus since the SLTs are similar to other DSLRs in terms of taking nice portraits and macro shots by using the right lens. In terms of IQ, i think most of the DSLRs out there are on par under good light condition and Sony EXMOR sensor proved to be quite good under low light condition with high ISO + low noise.
I have friends who are mainly N and C users thus the chances of them trying to pull me over to the N/C ship is quite high thus asking them would be useless. For some reason, I think there's a Sony fanboy in me.
All i know for sure at the moment is either sacrifice battery life for smaller light body or vice versa.
Based on the cons, i don't understand the following
* Way too many warnings, lockouts, and restrictions on too many of the A33's features -
What kinds of restriction?* Limited flash control
Isn't there like "Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless"?* Very limited customization in the menu system, no room for the learning and growing photographer to expand
I don't get this at all* No spot toggle for AEL
err??* Focus Magnifier could have been designed better (shuts off when you half press the shutter, difficult to use at times)
Don't understand either* Manual doesn't have enough details
details like??
Added on September 20, 2010, 6:40 pmbtw, ahpingko & porkchop, happy birthday!!
take more nice photos!!
This post has been edited by evilhomura89: Sep 20 2010, 06:41 PM