Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

115 Pages « < 17 18 19 20 21 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 AMD Bulldozer & Bobcat

views
     
hakunamatata
post Jun 13 2011, 03:03 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
511 posts

Joined: Aug 2007


when will the bulldozer be released?
culain99
post Jun 13 2011, 10:23 AM

-----
*****
Junior Member
765 posts

Joined: Jun 2007
yup me also waiting, when bulldozer be released ?
dunno go for i5-2500k or bulldozer, wanna upgrade from my trusty OC e6750
kingkingyyk
post Jun 13 2011, 02:44 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,694 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE
Also I do question the CPUZ also (version 1.57.1 does not mention Bulldozer support: CPUZ Version history). Also note the "Max TDP" in the CPUZ window (possible fake).

Take a look on your link, there is no 1.57.1, but 1.57 instead.
And also, CPU-Z 1.57 got the Max TDP window already.
user posted image

Anyway, I wonder where they get 1.57.1 rolleyes.gif

This post has been edited by kingkingyyk: Jun 13 2011, 02:45 PM
Silverfire
post Jun 13 2011, 05:26 PM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



QUOTE(kingkingyyk @ Jun 13 2011, 02:44 PM)
Take a look on your link, there is no 1.57.1, but 1.57 instead.
And also, CPU-Z 1.57 got the Max TDP window already.
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

Anyway, I wonder where they get 1.57.1  rolleyes.gif
*

He didn't mean the Max TDP window is fake. He meant the value might be fake.

1.57.1
http://www.sevenforums.com/software/147063...z-1-57-1-a.html
http://www.filehippo.com/download_cpuz/

1st link looks authentic. Files are hosted in cpuid.com.

This post has been edited by Silverfire: Jun 13 2011, 05:29 PM
MichaelJohn
post Jun 13 2011, 06:30 PM

Pan Paka Pan <3
*******
Senior Member
2,514 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
From: [Confidential]

mmmm.... lots of 990FX Board being unboxed and first preview brows.gif
lex
post Jun 13 2011, 07:43 PM

Old Am I?
Group Icon
VIP
18,182 posts

Joined: Jan 2005
From: Dagobah
QUOTE(kingkingyyk @ Jun 13 2011, 02:44 PM)
Anyway, I wonder where they get 1.57.1  rolleyes.gif
Its already available on CPUZ website (click on the CPUZ version history link in my previous post). AFAIK only the CPUZ screenshots with unrecognized engineering samples looks more valid (without the FX logo) icon_idea.gif

QUOTE(Silverfire @ Jun 13 2011, 05:26 PM)
He didn't mean the Max TDP window is fake. He meant the value might be fake.
Yups! A staggering "186W"! ohmy.gif sweat.gif

AlamakLor
post Jun 13 2011, 07:47 PM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
9,856 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur, WP


I'm pretty set on crosshair 5 for 990fx board
shin gouki
post Jun 13 2011, 08:19 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
74 posts

Joined: Jul 2005


Wanna ask pro here,
How can a software/game utilize all core of the cpu e.g. 8 cores
Izzit by programming language or game engine or the OS?
Sorry for the noob question tongue.gif
Silverfire
post Jun 13 2011, 08:35 PM

Cruxiaer
*******
Senior Member
4,947 posts

Joined: Nov 2007



QUOTE(shin gouki @ Jun 13 2011, 08:19 PM)
Wanna ask pro here,
How can a software/game utilize all core of the cpu e.g. 8 cores
Izzit by programming language or game engine or the OS?
Sorry for the noob question tongue.gif
*

All. OS then game engine then programming language to support the multi-threading/core.
kingkingyyk
post Jun 13 2011, 10:47 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,694 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
QUOTE(Silverfire @ Jun 13 2011, 08:35 PM)
All. OS then game engine then programming language to support the multi-threading/core.
*
If the game engine already supports multi core, then the compiled code will support multithread automatically.
You will deal with the game engine code instead if you decided to go with it.
The game engine will compile it's language. It has all of the facilities for you already. It is like a framework.
Indeed, if you decided to code the game by yourself without any game engine, and you want it to get multithread support, then you have to think yourself on how to managing the task for each core and add dynamic support for threads, even arbitrary number of threads.

Not attacking your post, but just to boost some facts into it.

This post has been edited by kingkingyyk: Jun 13 2011, 10:50 PM
Turnip
post Jun 13 2011, 11:18 PM

bonjour beau là-bas
******
Senior Member
1,111 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: UK


Awesome! APU for my new HTPC! rclxms.gif rclxms.gif
dma0991
post Jun 14 2011, 10:19 AM

nyoron~
*******
Senior Member
3,333 posts

Joined: Dec 2009


AMD A-Series Llano APU Sabine Notebook Platform Review

Llano mobile review is out early by 1 day despite the fact that the NDA is not lifted yet.
AlamakLor
post Jun 14 2011, 10:41 AM

Look at all my stars!!
Group Icon
Elite
9,856 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Kuala Lumpur, WP


Didn't bother reading the whole thing but is this suppose to be a low power replacement cpu to the E series chip? This is very significantly slower than intel.
jonchai
post Jun 14 2011, 10:47 AM

Ask me anything
******
Senior Member
1,568 posts

Joined: Sep 2010


APU's aren't supposed to be faster than Intel's offering. It's supposed to offer great graphics performance at a lower cost. That's what APU is all about. Not to kill Sandy Bridge in processing performance, but to kill it in the mainstream area where graphics matter most.
billytong
post Jun 14 2011, 11:00 AM

Lord Sauron
*******
Senior Member
4,522 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Mordor, Middle Earth.


regarding the 990FX

Arent most if not all bulldozer comes with ATI graphics? Why would AMD want to repeat Intel p67 mistake again? Shouldnt they just come out a chipset with vga support by default?
Turnip
post Jun 14 2011, 11:13 AM

bonjour beau là-bas
******
Senior Member
1,111 posts

Joined: Aug 2005
From: UK


QUOTE(billytong @ Jun 14 2011, 12:00 PM)
regarding the 990FX

Arent most if not all bulldozer comes with ATI graphics? Why would AMD want to repeat Intel p67 mistake again? Shouldnt they just come out a chipset with vga support by default?
*
FX series chipsets never came with IGP from their history i presume.Discrete graphics card is more preferable as 990FX are targeted in enthusiast level?
jonchai
post Jun 14 2011, 12:19 PM

Ask me anything
******
Senior Member
1,568 posts

Joined: Sep 2010


QUOTE(billytong @ Jun 14 2011, 11:00 AM)
regarding the 990FX

Arent most if not all bulldozer comes with ATI graphics? Why would AMD want to repeat Intel p67 mistake again? Shouldnt they just come out a chipset with vga support by default?
*
No. The first gen Bulldozer will not come with integrated graphics on die. However, the 990GX chipset should come with an IGP. The next generation of Fusion will be Bulldozer + Integrated graphics. Again, what's the mistake with Intel? P67 not allowing integrated graphics? AMD's case is not the same.
phenomenon
post Jun 14 2011, 12:23 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
16 posts

Joined: Jan 2010
From: Ampang, Kuala Lumpur



when this fx processor will be available at LOW YAT?????
Racerx
post Jun 14 2011, 12:57 PM

Tell Your World
*******
Senior Member
8,461 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: Kota Bharu,Kelantan



Mobile Llano Review

Desktop Llano Preview
kingkingyyk
post Jun 14 2011, 01:48 PM

10k Club
Group Icon
Elite
15,694 posts

Joined: Mar 2008
http://www.inpai.com.cn/doc/hard/151251.htm
Bulldozer Turbo Boost allows 1GHz clock speed boost at maximum.

Llano is slightly faster to Athlon II, clock-to-clock comparison.
But still far slower than Phenom II with L3 cache.
Disappointing. wink.gif
To AMD : The game is not changed. laugh.gif

This post has been edited by kingkingyyk: Jun 14 2011, 02:42 PM

115 Pages « < 17 18 19 20 21 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0199sec    0.32    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 05:16 AM