when will the bulldozer be released?
AMD Bulldozer & Bobcat
AMD Bulldozer & Bobcat
|
|
Jun 13 2011, 03:03 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
511 posts Joined: Aug 2007 |
when will the bulldozer be released?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 13 2011, 10:23 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
765 posts Joined: Jun 2007 |
yup me also waiting, when bulldozer be released ?
dunno go for i5-2500k or bulldozer, wanna upgrade from my trusty OC e6750 |
|
|
Jun 13 2011, 02:44 PM
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
QUOTE Also I do question the CPUZ also (version 1.57.1 does not mention Bulldozer support: CPUZ Version history). Also note the "Max TDP" in the CPUZ window (possible fake). Take a look on your link, there is no 1.57.1, but 1.57 instead. And also, CPU-Z 1.57 got the Max TDP window already. ![]() Anyway, I wonder where they get 1.57.1 This post has been edited by kingkingyyk: Jun 13 2011, 02:45 PM |
|
|
Jun 13 2011, 05:26 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007 |
QUOTE(kingkingyyk @ Jun 13 2011, 02:44 PM) Take a look on your link, there is no 1.57.1, but 1.57 instead. He didn't mean the Max TDP window is fake. He meant the value might be fake.And also, CPU-Z 1.57 got the Max TDP window already. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Anyway, I wonder where they get 1.57.1 1.57.1 http://www.sevenforums.com/software/147063...z-1-57-1-a.html http://www.filehippo.com/download_cpuz/ 1st link looks authentic. Files are hosted in cpuid.com. This post has been edited by Silverfire: Jun 13 2011, 05:29 PM |
|
|
Jun 13 2011, 06:30 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,514 posts Joined: Jun 2010 From: [Confidential] |
mmmm.... lots of 990FX Board being unboxed and first preview
|
|
|
Jun 13 2011, 07:43 PM
|
|
VIP
18,182 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Dagobah |
QUOTE(kingkingyyk @ Jun 13 2011, 02:44 PM) Anyway, I wonder where they get 1.57.1 Its already available on CPUZ website (click on the CPUZ version history link in my previous post). AFAIK only the CPUZ screenshots with unrecognized engineering samples looks more valid (without the FX logo) QUOTE(Silverfire @ Jun 13 2011, 05:26 PM) He didn't mean the Max TDP window is fake. He meant the value might be fake. Yups! A staggering "186W"! |
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 13 2011, 07:47 PM
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
I'm pretty set on crosshair 5 for 990fx board
|
|
|
Jun 13 2011, 08:19 PM
|
![]() ![]()
Junior Member
74 posts Joined: Jul 2005 |
Wanna ask pro here,
How can a software/game utilize all core of the cpu e.g. 8 cores Izzit by programming language or game engine or the OS? Sorry for the noob question |
|
|
Jun 13 2011, 08:35 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,947 posts Joined: Nov 2007 |
|
|
|
Jun 13 2011, 10:47 PM
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
QUOTE(Silverfire @ Jun 13 2011, 08:35 PM) If the game engine already supports multi core, then the compiled code will support multithread automatically.You will deal with the game engine code instead if you decided to go with it. The game engine will compile it's language. It has all of the facilities for you already. It is like a framework. Indeed, if you decided to code the game by yourself without any game engine, and you want it to get multithread support, then you have to think yourself on how to managing the task for each core and add dynamic support for threads, even arbitrary number of threads. Not attacking your post, but just to boost some facts into it. This post has been edited by kingkingyyk: Jun 13 2011, 10:50 PM |
|
|
Jun 13 2011, 11:18 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,111 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: UK |
Awesome! APU for my new HTPC!
|
|
|
Jun 14 2011, 10:19 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,333 posts Joined: Dec 2009 |
AMD A-Series Llano APU Sabine Notebook Platform Review
Llano mobile review is out early by 1 day despite the fact that the NDA is not lifted yet. |
|
|
Jun 14 2011, 10:41 AM
|
|
Elite
9,856 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Kuala Lumpur, WP |
Didn't bother reading the whole thing but is this suppose to be a low power replacement cpu to the E series chip? This is very significantly slower than intel.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 14 2011, 10:47 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,568 posts Joined: Sep 2010 |
APU's aren't supposed to be faster than Intel's offering. It's supposed to offer great graphics performance at a lower cost. That's what APU is all about. Not to kill Sandy Bridge in processing performance, but to kill it in the mainstream area where graphics matter most.
|
|
|
Jun 14 2011, 11:00 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,522 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Mordor, Middle Earth. |
regarding the 990FX
Arent most if not all bulldozer comes with ATI graphics? Why would AMD want to repeat Intel p67 mistake again? Shouldnt they just come out a chipset with vga support by default? |
|
|
Jun 14 2011, 11:13 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,111 posts Joined: Aug 2005 From: UK |
QUOTE(billytong @ Jun 14 2011, 12:00 PM) regarding the 990FX FX series chipsets never came with IGP from their history i presume.Discrete graphics card is more preferable as 990FX are targeted in enthusiast level?Arent most if not all bulldozer comes with ATI graphics? Why would AMD want to repeat Intel p67 mistake again? Shouldnt they just come out a chipset with vga support by default? |
|
|
Jun 14 2011, 12:19 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,568 posts Joined: Sep 2010 |
QUOTE(billytong @ Jun 14 2011, 11:00 AM) regarding the 990FX No. The first gen Bulldozer will not come with integrated graphics on die. However, the 990GX chipset should come with an IGP. The next generation of Fusion will be Bulldozer + Integrated graphics. Again, what's the mistake with Intel? P67 not allowing integrated graphics? AMD's case is not the same.Arent most if not all bulldozer comes with ATI graphics? Why would AMD want to repeat Intel p67 mistake again? Shouldnt they just come out a chipset with vga support by default? |
|
|
Jun 14 2011, 12:23 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
16 posts Joined: Jan 2010 From: Ampang, Kuala Lumpur |
when this fx processor will be available at LOW YAT?????
|
|
|
Jun 14 2011, 12:57 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
8,461 posts Joined: Mar 2007 From: Kota Bharu,Kelantan |
|
|
|
Jun 14 2011, 01:48 PM
|
|
Elite
15,694 posts Joined: Mar 2008 |
http://www.inpai.com.cn/doc/hard/151251.htm
Bulldozer Turbo Boost allows 1GHz clock speed boost at maximum. Llano is slightly faster to Athlon II, clock-to-clock comparison. But still far slower than Phenom II with L3 cache. Disappointing. To AMD : The game is not changed. This post has been edited by kingkingyyk: Jun 14 2011, 02:42 PM |
| Change to: | 0.0199sec
0.32
6 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 29th November 2025 - 05:16 AM |