S95 don't have it but I bet soon many camera will come with it built in. Right now, you only option is:

http://photofinder.atpinc.com/what.html

if ur going to also order the richard franiec grip then can la

More and more people place the order online nowadays

what is that? I nid to collect some order to get the freeshipping =(

had lunch here

Hey you can count me in if I can get the black colour one.

should i get this, or the xz1

camry vs accord

This of course.

Why would u wanna mount a compact with a flash? Get a DSLR for that.

i think s95 is more user friendly

bottom line, s95 users will say s95 is the best!

http://www.kleptography.com/rf/#camera_s90
makes the camera easier to hold.

I have a S90 (well.. partly anyway since its with the missus all the time).... a dslr and recently a XZ-1.

If you shoot RAW, at crappy light and getting a 2nd/3rd cam... the XZ-1's seriously capable.

If shooting full auto, convenience as in can fit into jeans pocket.... or if you don't know f4.9 to f2.5 is how many stops... then get the S95.

If video is important or you want the 24mm wide angle.... then consider the LX5

If tilt LCD = camwhoring is most important... or if you wanna be seriously uncool ... then maybe the Samsung EX1

If you know who is Daido Moriyama.. shoots only "artistic" B&W's...a purist by heart... consider the Ricoh GRDIII

Can't go wrong with anyone of these.

sniper, get it from ur wife today, take pictures of the same scene with both the cameras n compare it here! that shud do the trick

Dpreview compare jor...

http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/OlympusXZ1/page11.asp

To elaborate more on my previous post.... S90/95 is the one to get if the person wants to use it like a point and shoot or doesn't wanna fuss about too much.

XZ-1 holds more fine details and contrast even at higher ISO in its RAW files but have to really work to get it.

All of the cameras takes good pictures

hey sniper, finer details from the xz-1 is from the software or hardware? for fussy ppl like me, i will go for something that can shoot better pictures but if my eyes cant really see the differences, s95 would be prefered due to the ease of use

but in the end it also depends on whether to spend just a little bit more to get an entry level dslr

---

Added on June 20, 2011, 11:07 am1 question, the camera fits exactly into the casing or do u need to put some kind of padding/sponge in it? looks kinda bulky to put in the pocket...

This post has been edited by adam_lss: Jun 20 2011, 11:07 AM

i don think it is suitable to put in a pocket.
my experience is i put my camera and bottle into my bag, and the bottle leak then....
so i need it to protect it...

---

Added on June 20, 2011, 11:29 am
this one with clear lid cost rm110


this one with black lid RM 80
(Sale item like the blue color one)



So do u want to order it?
have to make it fast, takut later the promotion off =P

---

Added on June 20, 2011, 11:30 amI canot find this one amazon.com...


This post has been edited by hiroko_jiayi: Jun 20 2011, 11:30 AM

if it is something like this i dont mind coz there is a protective padding...

XZ-1 in my opinion has better hardware... while the jpeg processing in the Canon is better.

But ya... for convenience.. S90/95 is THE true compact... much more pocketable.

ps: DSLR (even entry ones) are a different ballgame altogether.. none of the compacts come close.

I got mine from lensmate

http://www.lensmateonline.com/store/

u need to add on the padding with freaking RM60.....
I m going to see whether i can find it in local hardware shop...

here is the pelican 1010 stress test.
Amazing!



http://youtu.be/icbbEGlk55w