Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Canon S95, replacement for S90

views
     
SUSOptiplex330
post Jun 17 2011, 10:16 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
So the latest price for this camera is around the RM1200 - 1300 mark?

I am holding off my purchase until they come out with GPS function.

SUSOptiplex330
post Jun 17 2011, 11:10 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(adam_lss @ Jun 17 2011, 10:30 AM)
it would be a nice add on, but personally i dont really need a gps on the cam, coz it doesnt actually improve anything on the pictures smile.gif
*
It would be very useful when after years gone by, you can still tell where that photo was taken.

As for short battery life, at any one location, I only intend to take one photo with geo-tag and then off the GPS to conserve battery life.


SUSOptiplex330
post Jun 17 2011, 11:58 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(masachi @ Jun 17 2011, 11:54 AM)
Geo-tag…really nice function as I always forget where is the photo taken. shakehead.gif
*
Use photo browser like Picasa and at the side, there will be a little map showing you where that particular photo was taken. Neat.

SUSOptiplex330
post Jun 17 2011, 03:11 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(adam_lss @ Jun 17 2011, 01:35 PM)
how much additional for the gps?
*
S95 don't have it but I bet soon many camera will come with it built in. Right now, you only option is:

http://photofinder.atpinc.com/what.html

SUSOptiplex330
post Jun 22 2011, 07:19 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(adam_lss @ Jun 22 2011, 07:00 AM)
correct, owning an expensive highest-end camera doesnt make u a super photographer with super pictures! smile.gif
*
A photo may be technically perfect but no inspirational value. Science vs Art


SUSOptiplex330
post Jun 23 2011, 12:35 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(nabelon @ Jun 22 2011, 01:51 AM)
I used to own an alpha 300, sold it because i didn't like lugging it around, so usually left it home collecting dust although you can't deny the picture quality is awesome minus the heavy noise with the alpha sensor on higher isos compared to other dslrs.

*
This is the reason why I am looking at the Nokia N8. Yes, I know it's a camera phone but it goes everywhere I go. Can't say that even for compact camera and the photo taken is supposedly even better than some dedicated compact camera like the Sony HX5.

SUSOptiplex330
post Jun 23 2011, 01:19 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Jun 23 2011, 01:04 PM)
The N8 is super slow.

Image quality is one thing la.. and while I reckon its normal that people expect their equipment to give them the best image quality by looking at the trends in consumer cameras these days but one crucial aspect that's been neglected is "handling".

It's fine if u wanna shoot inanimate objects but by the time u get the N8 to get ready to take pics... the sun has set, the food has gone stale.... the gf has ran away... the decisive moment has gone.

In that aspect.... the Iphone4's a much better point n shoot tongue.gif
*
But still a heck of a lot faster than running home to pick up the compact camera at home rclxm9.gif
SUSOptiplex330
post Jun 23 2011, 01:31 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Jun 23 2011, 01:27 PM)
I'm all with the whole cliched best camera is the one with u thing.. just saying from little experience that the N8 may not be the best of the best camera with u cos the handling suxs.
*
Please tell me more. I prefer good picture instead of speed and that's why I am looking at the N8.
http://www.fonearena.com/blog/24096/nokia-...comparison.html

What other would you recommend?


Added on June 23, 2011, 1:33 pm
QUOTE(adam_lss @ Jun 23 2011, 01:28 PM)
aiya, be like me, i bring my s95 everywhere, whether i take pics or not is another story! smile.gif
*
I was once considering the S95 but I am also wanted the GPS. I like all my photo geo-tagged

This post has been edited by Optiplex330: Jun 23 2011, 01:38 PM
SUSOptiplex330
post Jun 23 2011, 01:42 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Jun 23 2011, 01:37 PM)
I'm not really a phone person (so I won't know what to recommend u) but I considered the N8 before and have played with it.

In a point n shoot perspective... when see something... u just wanna turn on ur camera/cameraphone and quickly snap right?

With the N8.. have to wait... and wait... and wait for the camera to be operational before you can snap

Eventually I settled with an Iphone 4 (doesn't mean that its the best) cos its so much faster for the camera to start taking pictures.. also the shot-to-shot time.

As for good picture...if you look at all the legendary pictures in history.. most of them are taken with equipment far more "crappier" than ur average cameraphone.

Hence my 2 cents that "image quality" is of lesser importance compared with the shooter and the handling.
*
Yes, your understanding of my need is spot on.

I was pretty impressed with the N8 photo quality.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/41150345@N06/...ith/5160914864/


As for time taken to launch the camera 1st shot, yes, they did say N8 is slow like you mentioned:
http://noqualityreview.wordpress.com/2011/...imaging-device/
SUSOptiplex330
post Jun 23 2011, 02:29 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Jun 23 2011, 01:46 PM)
The sorta comparison in the link is quite pointless actually. Reason being is that you're talking about point n shoots here with almost no control exposure... the difference is so minute and can tip both ways in even the slightest change of shooting conditions.

Personally.. I wouldn't even consider the IXUS or any plain point n shoot cameras. Like you say.. why carry another extra gadget the doesn't give any substantial benefit.

Enthuasiast compacts like the S95 etc is a different ballgame altogether.
The difference is not with the IQ  per say but with the controls, in the right hands and know-how (just pointing and shooting will give the same result as any point n shoot camera really) , it can provide spectacular results.
*
I originally started looking for a GPS camera and was looking at the Panasonic TZ10/20 but came to conclusion I needed a more compact camera with better low light ability and not telephoto. Hence was looking at S95 and 4000IS but they don't have GPS. I will probably re-look at the next generation S95 if they have GPS.

I can not consider your iPhone because it does not have the type of GPS package that Nokia has, namely, free worldwide map and voice navigation.


This post has been edited by Optiplex330: Jun 23 2011, 02:30 PM
SUSOptiplex330
post Jun 23 2011, 03:55 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(adam_lss @ Jun 23 2011, 03:23 PM)
very soon, u'll get a camera that has wifi capabilities and u can browse the web thru the lcd thumbup.gif
*
A camera can not make phone calls. But a Smartphone can take picture so that's the closest we get right now, hence my looking at N8 instead.



SUSOptiplex330
post Jul 2 2011, 12:09 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(Frida8 @ Jun 28 2011, 07:52 PM)
want an iPhone so badly,
but for photo shooting, I still prefer to use digital cameras
I am not so sure after I read reviews saying the Nokia N8 takes better or just as good picture as the very good Sony HX5. A big plus for phone for sure is, it goes everywhere you go, unlike the cameras.


SUSOptiplex330
post Jul 2 2011, 12:33 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(adam_lss @ Jul 2 2011, 12:16 PM)
eh kawan, where are your photos taken with s95? this one not N8 or iphone thread  rolleyes.gif
*
I was thinking of the S95 primarily due to it's low light ability but it does not have the GPS geo-tag feature so wait for replacement model...or get the N8 for time being.


This post has been edited by Optiplex330: Jul 2 2011, 12:37 PM
SUSOptiplex330
post Jul 3 2011, 10:46 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
Little kid

This post has been edited by Optiplex330: Jul 3 2011, 10:58 PM
SUSOptiplex330
post Jul 8 2011, 12:10 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
Kid will get angry if you do not buy S95 because it has no GPS. LOL.



SUSOptiplex330
post Sep 15 2011, 10:43 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(aquos @ Sep 15 2011, 08:52 PM)
Canon announced S100 today. I wonder when it will be available in M'sia.
Many changes. Check it out at the usual sites.
*
Great. Finally a S95 with GPS function. Any guess what's the price it's going to be here?

SUSOptiplex330
post Sep 16 2011, 07:12 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(aquos @ Sep 16 2011, 07:00 AM)
-better front and rear grip (FRANIEC must be disappointed)
-now available in "titanium" colour option
-RRP $430 available in Nov 2011
-all said i prefer the solid brick look 
and faster lens of S95.
- 2 yrs warranty remaining on my s95 so not much
reasons to upgrade.
*
Hi. Can you tell me:
1. What was the original price when S95 first came out?
2. When did it came out? 1 yr ago? 2 yrs ago?
3. What's the normal street price for a new S95

Give me what to expect with the S100.
SUSOptiplex330
post Sep 16 2011, 11:18 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(sniper on the roof @ Sep 16 2011, 10:18 AM)
GPS and longer zoom may appeal to the more casual users but they already have good casual user powershot with long zoom and gps in the SX230.
I do not need 14x optical zoom. I wanted a bigger aperture and GPS instead.
SUSOptiplex330
post Sep 17 2011, 11:59 AM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(aquos @ Sep 17 2011, 11:43 AM)
s95 is better than s90 so s100 will surely be better than s95.
Canon already claim s100 at iso1600 is the same as s95 at iso400.
For me direct video button and ability to zoom during video
shoot is a plus. Also s100 focus point can be moved around . s95
focus point is center at P mode which i normally use. At auto
the camera chose the multi focus points.
Right now i say no plan to upgrade but once Ken Rockwell claim
it is the new "best compact in the world" ( now he claim it is the s95)
I will rush out and buy the s100. I am a sucker for the guy's review.
A seldom mention plus for s95/s90/s100 is its most compact size and lowest
price when compared to other premium compacts. This encourage
owners carry them around. The best camera is no use if kept at home.
*
My view exactly. Unless you are a professional photographer carrying your camera 24/7 everywhere you go or you actually expect to take photos that day so carry a dedicated camera with you, the best camera for many people is actually a phone with camera function. This is simply because people nowaday carry phone with them everywhere they go 24/7, some even took their phone into the own house toilet.

SUSOptiplex330
post Sep 17 2011, 05:40 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
12,696 posts

Joined: Aug 2008
QUOTE(adam_lss @ Sep 17 2011, 03:38 PM)
it doesnt matter whether the s100 is better than the s95 or not. most important, s95 users better ask urself if u are thinking of upgrading to the s100... have u really pushed the s95 to its very limit? i always believe, the best camera, is the camera u are currently having! smile.gif
*
A little correction. The best camera is the camera that happens to be in your hand at the time you wanted to use it, and not at home sitting in the drawer somewhere.


2 Pages  1 2 >Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0346sec    0.22    7 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 09:32 PM