Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

30 Pages « < 23 24 25 26 27 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 Autofoam Review

views
     
BaronVonchesto
post Oct 16 2018, 05:40 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
102 posts

Joined: May 2008
does KL auto do underbody rustproofing?
chinteck79
post Oct 16 2018, 07:25 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
59 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
I tried foaming on my 2nd gen vios. Not from Desmond though but from another lowyat advertiser near pheonix plaza last time. Can't find his thread d. I can feel the chasis stiffer. Car more stable. I just do under carriage only. Quite satisfied n cheaper then autofoam brand. Soundproofing is 0 percent improvement. Stiffness yes, after few days even more stiff
Jedi
post Jan 22 2019, 02:37 PM

Pax Et Bonum
*******
Senior Member
2,245 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
Looks like some gooding to read. So bump

-Parked for summary so easier to refer later-

QUOTE(cuckoo bird @ Aug 24 2011, 11:27 AM)
Referring to comments on Autofoam, for those of you who have not done it, you need to be very clear of what effect Autofoam will have for your ride.

Autofoam on the chassis will no doubt give you the following benefits -
- better NVH on highway speed, wind turbulence noise can be reduced with foam filled chassis vs. hollow chassis.
- slightly better handling.
- increased rigidness of chassis / reduce the chassis flex.

But there is a negative effect on your ride comfort, for a Vios, your creamy smooth ride quality on soft sprung absorber will be affected.

Some people may believe and say that Autofoam gives you continental car feeling like BMW, I would not say its not true,...but its only partially true, let me put it this way -

- over certain road conditions, for example highways,...or freeway type of smoother roads with smoothly tarred connection on different road levels, then yes,...you can feel the firmness of the ride, abit BMW like because your car's feeling over such smooth bumps are more direct and less squat.

- However, if you are to go to some town roads, with alot of small bumps on left, right of the road,...your ride is gonna suffer badly,...it is gonna feel too "busy"...quite alot worse than before foaming.
Or if you go thru lots of ripples on the road,...you will suffer more vibrations,...basically the ride is harsher.
Therefore, the notion of autofoam making your car feels continental is only partly true,...there is a negative side to the ride quality as well.

In conclusion, doing autofoam makes you realise that how much your chassis flex before doing foaming. But, a chassis flex is not always a bad thing, depending on how you look at it. If you are sporty driver placing top priority over ride comfort, by all means you can consider autofoam.
For our conventional cars, chassis flexibility is actually an extension of the bump and road uneveness absorption, thus improving ride quality.

1. It had been argued that autofoam or chassis stiffening improves ride quality because a stiff chassis forces the absorber to work harder to absorb the bump. This is true that the absorber probably works harder and absorbs more bump. However, a car with original absorber and chassis flex configuration still rides more comfortable on most road conditions.

Why? You can imagine this -
Scenario 1, original car chassis flex with original absorber = one mattress (or something similar) placed over 4 springs at different end.

Scenario 2, Autofoamed chassis with original absorber = a very stiff plank placed over 4 springs. 

Both have plank and mattress have similar weight, when there is energy forced from spring to plank,...it needs to work harder to absorb the impact from below because the plank is stiff. While for the mattress, the spring works less when there is impact from below. But when you sit on the middle of the plank you feel more movements compared to sitting on the mattress.
What does this mean? A flexing mattress will be more comfortable than the stiff plank to sit on even though the spring works harder on the plank.

It is not true flexible chassis causes discomfort to the ride, you are sitting in the middle of the car,...the flex is more on the both ends of the car at front and read wheel,....just like the mattress.
So more or less you guys understand what autofoam does?
I don't have anything against autofoam, I just want you guys to be very clear of the effect because it is not reversible once you do it.
For guys who place very high priority on ride comfort, they regret doing autofoam even though it helps to reduce noise level to a certain extent. You can check out some random displeasures out there in Autoworld forum.

What i am commenting is on normal mainstream cars like Vios, City and so on.

Some could argue that stiffer chassis is definitely better because all the car manufacturers like BMW is increase the stiffness for newer model. But you need to understand that when the engineer of Honda or Toyota perform suspension R&D test on the Vios, it is based on such flexible chassis, so if you stiffen the chassis, it throws out the perfect original comfort setting, the absorber would not work as well for comfort anymore.

BMWs and Merc are different, they are heavy cars,...and they want handling performance as well as comfort,...for these cars, their ideology to achieve this is to stiffen up the chassis,...to optimize for handling and comfort,..and their suspension tuning is based on such chassis stiffness.
*
QUOTE(cuckoo bird @ Aug 24 2011, 10:48 PM)
Hallo brother Ice Cube....

Yeah...I just did foaming and share my thoughts here.
I am more for comfort guy,...so personally I got mixed feelings on the result.
On highway and smoother stretch of road,...I like it,...but on more bumpy road, ride become harsher.

The reason I wrote very lengthy explanations is not against any shops or whatever,...
my main purpose is to share in good description what it is exactly like doing foaming.

Before I did it,...going thru other forums, I found a few things, no offense -

- just like political scene, many people can be very easily influenced by general public opinion. When this happens it clouds their actual judgement, and start believing what everyone says, while on the other hand the actual result is different.

Alot of people are promised continental ride quality after foaming,...and start believing it. Especially after they read stuff like travelling at 160km/h feels like 110km/h before and so on......these are all "over-blown statements"...
If you say the after improvement is 130km/h feels like 110km/h,....maybe thats more like it.
Many people confuse firm ride vs. harsh ride quality.
In general, there are so many different types of road conditions we travel through daily (e.g town road bumpiness,..freeway smoothness and so on).
Autofoam gives you a real continental feeling only on certain road conditions,....whereas in other road conditions,..the ride is harsh. I can gurantee you that BMW, Merc and Audi sedan has firm ride,..but on ripples and small bumps all over,..they are not too firm or harsh, even though they have very stiff chassis.
Probably its because of their car heavy weight,...and a different absorber mechanism/ suspension system.
I agree with you and can imagine that Kenari with chassis foaming would have tremendous improvement in handling. Well, Kenari in its original form with tall body,...definitely have very huge amount of flex...
Glad that you enjoyed it... brows.gif
Anyway,...the bottomline is that,....I just want to give a detailed, real and unbiased experience to guys who wish to do foaming. Because I do realise that finding good experience is hard on the forum,..alot of it is diluted and influenced views which does not paint the true picture.
*
QUOTE(cuckoo bird @ Aug 25 2011, 09:14 PM)
Hi Quazacolt, Samwong,....

I am not trying to pour cold water on this autofoam stuff,...as I had mentioned earlier, I just want to give some neutral view and make sure anyone considering it really knows the implication.
As it is not reversible,...you would not want to regret having to bear with your daily transport for many years to come before selling it off.

What I suggest for anyone considering doing it is to do a test on someone's car who did autofoam,...do a real "apple to apple comparison"....

Lets say for you Sam, with your Persona,...find someone with a Persona who had done it....
A car with same wheels and rim configuration,,....with same stock absorber and spring. When you do comparison,...you really need to do a side by side with your own car....
P/S - do make sure that the benchmark car you are looking for is at least 10 days after autofoam,....because initially the harshness is bearable, but as the foam starts hardening, so do the chassis stiffness,...and so do the ride quality become harder....Don't test on a car that is fresh from autofoam oven...i.e,..who just did it same day or only a day after.

Do make sure you test it over several different road conditions,...eg. -
- highway type of road
- town road with small imperfections along the way...
- bumpy roads...
- roads with alot of connection to "bridge" with different levels...

Do it side by side,...then you can really tell whether you like it or you think you cannot bear with the increased overly firmness or harshness.
Don't just test it on only one type of road conditions,...because if you test it on only the super smooth highway road,...you definitely will love the autofoam treatment.
But in real life,....for most people,...they travel thru many different road conditions on a daily basis...

In my personal opinion, most of our mainstream cars like City, Persona,..Vios, ..Altis have more of less same characteristics of flexing chassis,...and the chassis flex actually is part of the bump absorption that improves ride quality. But there is also chances that I may be wrong in the sense that a Vios is badly impacted,...while Persona's ride quality not so much affected.
I had read that Altis who did Autofoam also has same complain of harshness.

So bottomline is that,...if you really still want to consider it,....find someone with exactly the same car to do an exact apple to apple comparison with your car.

Else,...it is a risk for you to take if you can't find a benchmark comparison.

Relying on others' opinion are just too risky without testing by yourself. Just an example,..I do know someone who is a real confident speaker,...who tells me his family's Avanza ride quality is good,...yet complains that the latest Mercedes E-class ride is not comfortable....
I am just giving this example just to warn you about the danger of relying blindly on opinions...

Cheers.
*
QUOTE(DSV4600 @ Sep 3 2011, 11:44 PM)
Dear All,

Adding my review of Autofoam to this active discussion as well.
My car was recently Autofoam-ed & had some soundproofing done to my Proton Saga LMST 1.3 (M) in July 2011.
My car is almost 4 years old now, Dec 2007, with my mileage around 55,000, running on Hankook V2 Blackbird tyres (185/60/14) that have been used for around 20,000 kms. My tyre pressure for all 4 tyres is usually 250kpa.
My front bonnet also has the RM50 cheap soundproofing material affixed previously.

The package done to my car was as follows:-
1) Autofoam Luxury - Full package with roof treatment, however C pillars was not foamed to ensure proper cabin pressure
2) Soundproofing - Total Rear Package (Boot Lit & Butt Package Treatment) & Floor Package
3) OMITTED FOR LATER - Total Door Package + Front Tyres + Front Bonnet / Engine Treatment

Here's my review of the products offered as per benefits stated on KL Auto's website:-

A) Strengthen & Stiffen the cars structure and improve Torsional rigidity.
This will then drastically reduce chassis twist & flex. A stronger chassis will also transfer more energy away from the cars body. Thus you will enjoy...

~ Tighter & Tauter Ride.
~ Sharper & more Agile Handling.
~ Reduce Body Roll & Hop.
~ Improved Steering Response.


=> I personally feel the car is much more stiff & rigid, resulting in a more tighter ride with sharp agile handling. However, I do feel that the car's comfort levels are stiffer compared to the floaty mattress like feeling it had previously. An example of this is that on very bumpy old roads, kampung roads, untarred roads as well as damaged roads with a lot of potholes and uneven elevation, the car feels like you're driving a very quiet rally car instead of a noisy road car. This makes my stock suspensions & springs work harder as all the energy & load is being transferred to these components instead of being absorbed by the chassis flex. Even when taking to 30km/h speed bumps, you can feel the car taking the bump as an entire car without the chassis flexing as compared to previously, I could feel the front half of the car absorbing the impact of the bump before the read end takes over. With the above being said, I would say Autofoam is beneficial, but you will need to be prepared to upgrade your stock suspension & even springs perhaps to better quality ones since the chassis has been stiffened quite dramatically and thus changing the dynamics of your vehicle as previously highlighted by one of the forummers in this forum previously. This maybe a good thing or a bad thing for some people, as this is very subjective for each driver, as some prefer keeping their cars stock condition with stock parts, while some aim to improve every aspect of their car compared to the factory set-up.

B) Seals off hollow sections, NVH (Noise, Vibration, Harshness) is blocked out & absorbed.

~ Absorbs road Vibrations & Harshness for a drastically improved Ride.
~ Blocks out Noise, Dust & Moisture.
~ Absorbs Structure Borne vibrations & noise for a luxury comfort.
~ Helps reduce Body, Drivetrain Creaks & Groans.


=> In terms of NVH, I do feel that my car is much more silent compared to previously before doing any Autofoam. I have also done an apple to apple comparison as my mom owns the same car in stock factory condition. Whenever I'm back in Ipoh, I always leave my car in the car porch and use my mom's car instead, to feel out the differences. I always find myself wishing I was driving my own car instead due to the better NVH levels which makes me feel more relaxed when I'm driving. But enough with the subjective opinion above; here's my objective opinion:-

~~ On normal roads and highways, the car is much quieter. Outside sound is reduced, especially from the road and other vehicles (big lorries, trucks with containers, express buses, town buses, cars, and motorcycles). When I wind down my windows when the car is stationary, I can definitely feel the difference in sound levels. And when driving in the same road conditions with my mom's stock car, I always feel that her car is noisier in terms of this.

~~ On very bad road conditions & off-road, just one sentence. The car feels like a silent rally car. There's still some harshness & bumpiness in terms of the way the car & the suspension absorbs the impacts of the drive, but I still feel that the car is better compared to what it was in stock condition. But of course, this is my personal opinion and the new set-up suits my driving styles.

~~ Overall cabin / cockpit noise, creaks and groans - The noise levels in the car has been reduced significantly as I notice I'm able to listen to clearer music at lower volume levels at any speed. In terms of creaks and groans, my car hardly had any creaks and groans before this, and it remains the same. However, due to the car much more quieter than previously, the small sounds that didn't annoy me previously ended up nagging me now, but I went back to Desmond to troubleshoot this, and all sounds have been eliminated. I still do hear very strong wind sounds at high speeds, but my car doors have yet to be treated and my car has those window visors which help to create louder wind sounds as well.

Summary:-

PRO(s)
1 - Improved Ride & Handling
2 - Reduced NVH Levels
3 - Stiffer Chassis Feel

UN-TESTED / UN-PROVEN
1 - Stronger Chassis (Invisible Roll-Cage) which will help protect passengers in a car accident?
2 - Rejected Insurance Claims by Insurance Agencies when car is involved in an accident
3 - 10 Year Warranty Period. What does this mean?

CON(s)
1 - Very steep pricing of the Autofoam packages + soundproofing
2 - My wife has been complaining of being car-sick during long journeys in the car, which never happened before this.
3 - Sometimes I feel my head to be heavy + head-aches during long journeys in the car.

For now, this is my un-biased review of the products being offered by Desmond.
For CON(s) 2 & 3, I have yet to address this with Desmond as I've been busy driving all across the country with my car and clocking up more mileage to experience the differences of Autofoam, and will do so this month. Will update everyone on the outcome once I meet up with Desmond.

Would I recommend this to a friend or come back with my next new car for a repeated treatment; Hmmmmmm, well, this would be a YES or NO answer as it really depends on what an individual wants for his / her car. I was thinking about doing this treatment for more than a year, since buying my car in June 2010. I finally decided to do so because I'm planning to keep my car for the next 5/10/15/20 years without selling and I find this a worthy investment (RM4k). Desmond offers a 12 month easy payment scheme through Maybank credit cards (0% interest & service charges). Also, I considered the 3 in 1 aspects offered by the treatment (Improved NVH, better ride & handling & invisible roll-cage / stronger chassis).

Trust everyone knows the 'milo tin' feeling of any Proton Saga, and Desmond's treatment really helped do wonders to my car. And since I've seen parts of my car interior being opened up previously, I have no qualms about having my entire car interior & boot stripped naked for the Autofoam & soundproofing package. However, if it was still a new / virgin car that has yet to have any interior parts opened up, I'd rather have my car remain stock. This does not mean Desmond's team does not perform an outstanding job of stripping the car bare. They do it amazingly well, as though it was their own car, and even take the time to clean up all the accumulated dust and debris that is hidden under all the plastic and fabric in the car.

In terms of service levels & quality, I would rate KL Auto a 10/10, however, this expensive Autofoam treatment may not be everyone's cup of tea, especially if you're the type of person who changes cars every 5 years.
But for a person planning to use their car for more than 10 years - 20 years, or maybe even longer, I think it's worthwhile as I believe it will help to preserve the chassis and also reduce metal fatigue in my car. This can only be analysed and proven in the long run, as I've yet to personally meet an owner of an Autofoamed car that has aged so long and past Desmond's 10 year warranty period.

Will continue to keep everyone updated after my next visit to KL Auto.
icon_rolleyes.gif
*
QUOTE(Eternalgl0ry @ May 9 2017, 03:35 PM)
Yeah this is what i heard from complains from some people. I heard the boss " desmond " and his disciple only sit there cit chat and do not really work on cheap cars. Pretty hash in my opinion

I went the other day to see... All mostly teenagers doing the job... very inexperience and slow .

I would go for them if only the experienced staffs know what to do...
*
QUOTE(jamespaul @ Apr 19 2018, 03:09 PM)
Foaming your chassis means, giving moisture an opportunity to be trapped by the foam. Trapped moisture means rust, rust means weaker chassis

Without understanding actual car's design. Foaming cannot reduce noise and increase stiffness effectively. Also, foam is NOT even close to being as hard as steel.

When you say comfort, I presume you want reduced noise, noise rarely travel through the chassis into cabin. Sound travels in a straight line and radiates from source. Foaming your chassis is like putting a finger few centimeters away from your ear, trying not to hear the radio.
*
This post has been edited by Jedi: Jan 22 2019, 10:06 PM
Jedi
post Jan 22 2019, 09:22 PM

Pax Et Bonum
*******
Senior Member
2,245 posts

Joined: Apr 2005
so I wish to ask those who has applied Autofoam,

say I have UR bars stage 1 installed, will applying autofoam go hand in hand or make the ride super stiff?

user posted image

Bec if we talk about chassis strengthening then the Track Package is something to do. (absorbing dmg from collisions would be most effective based on the graph)

for the noise package I understand desmond has another rm 2250 package

jamespaul
post Jan 23 2019, 04:21 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
211 posts

Joined: Oct 2014
QUOTE(Jedi @ Jan 22 2019, 09:22 PM)
so I wish to ask those who has applied Autofoam,

say I have UR bars stage 1 installed, will applying autofoam go hand in hand or make the ride super stiff?

user posted image

Bec if we talk about chassis strengthening then the Track Package is something to do. (absorbing dmg from collisions would be most effective based on the graph)

for the noise package I understand desmond has another rm 2250 package
*
Waste of money.

Why foaming is not done by manufacturer? Because steel is stronger than foam.

but, if you want to spend it, go ahead. Foaming is snake oil, like adding oil additives (if you use branded oil and your car has no inherent issues).
SUSFenix98
post Jan 25 2019, 12:01 AM

Happy Meal upsized Sir?
***
Junior Member
377 posts

Joined: Jun 2016
QUOTE(jamespaul @ Jan 23 2019, 04:21 PM)
Waste of money.

Why foaming is not done by manufacturer? Because steel is stronger than foam.

but, if you want to spend it, go ahead. Foaming is snake oil, like adding oil additives (if you use branded oil and your car has no inherent issues).
*
I agree and concur. NVH should be using sound deadening material and rubber bushings, just as the manufacturers do, which there will be weight penalty. Weight is good too makes the car feels more stable at high speed. You want less flex and better handling ? You need to reinforce your frame... awesome write up here....

http://www.jdm-option.com/eng/feature/05_10/bodyup.html

This post has been edited by Fenix98: Jan 25 2019, 12:03 AM
hugo67
post Mar 8 2019, 03:20 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
190 posts

Joined: Dec 2010


Old topics - Would autofoaming void the car warranty?

I have been checking around online but seems like no one can validate this.

Most car BMW and Mazda been providing 5 years warranty and maintenance, I am concern if my warranty voided after autofoaming or soundproofing.

Any of you experience warranty issues?
JZenith
post Mar 8 2019, 03:50 PM

Look at my stars. owai
*****
Junior Member
704 posts

Joined: Aug 2018
From: Shemalelism



QUOTE(hugo67 @ Mar 8 2019, 03:20 PM)
Old topics - Would autofoaming void the car warranty?

I have been checking around online but seems like no one can validate this.

Most car BMW and Mazda been providing 5 years warranty and maintenance, I am concern if my warranty voided after autofoaming or soundproofing.

Any of you experience warranty issues?
*
experienced with UR bars on my waja engine bay, some aunty crashed my front left tyre badly and unable to drive,
called insurance, made police report and towed to insurance panel to inspect before sending to repairs,
the UR bars that linked both front suspension causing both bushings and chasis mended, end up the report written the right side of the car is not claimable.

but found a insurance panel workshop (not offiicial proton) that will fix that for you too for additional RM300 even the insurance written its not insured (did their dirty tricks).

but friendly advise not to autofoam your car if you are looking for comfort as you will not able to uninstall like UR bars or soundproof mat, also will affect your chasis flex, your car will be vry stiff and less comfort.
SUSAllnGap
post Jul 26 2019, 11:05 PM

[ Modding with Passion(tm) ]
*******
Senior Member
4,561 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penangites



QUOTE(jamespaul @ Jan 23 2019, 04:21 PM)
Waste of money.

Why foaming is not done by manufacturer? Because steel is stronger than foam.

but, if you want to spend it, go ahead. Foaming is snake oil, like adding oil additives (if you use branded oil and your car has no inherent issues).
*
I think the foam works, just whether you will like the setup or new feel or not.
If you regret it, can't undo the foam
changleonghao
post Jul 27 2019, 11:00 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
152 posts

Joined: May 2019
QUOTE(AllnGap @ Jul 26 2019, 11:05 PM)
I think the foam works, just whether you will like the setup or new feel or not.
If you regret it, can't undo the foam
*
did autofoam on my waja over 15 years ago. yes, it's snake oil. if such a great foam can replace steel, definitely car manufacturers would use it.

the boss desomond is a sly one with a sweet mouth. even the so-called audio tuning is load of crap. but that;s a story for another time.
netmatrix
post Jul 27 2019, 11:50 AM

The machine... it sees everything.
*******
Senior Member
6,730 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Zion


Foam in crevices only works as sound dampener. It does not assist in structure integrity. You can do a simple test.

Fill a pipe either steel or plastic. Knock the pipe before you foam it up. You can hear the hollow sound.

Foam it up wait to cure. Then knock the pipe again. It sounds rigid & solid.

Try to break the pipe, hammer, hydraulics, etc. They break the same way.

It is perceived structural strength.

This post has been edited by netmatrix: Jul 27 2019, 11:50 AM
changleonghao
post Jul 27 2019, 12:15 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
152 posts

Joined: May 2019
QUOTE(netmatrix @ Jul 27 2019, 11:50 AM)
Foam in crevices only works as sound dampener. It does not assist in structure integrity. You can do a simple test.

Fill a pipe either steel or plastic. Knock the pipe before you foam it up. You can hear the hollow sound.

Foam it up wait to cure. Then knock the pipe again. It sounds rigid & solid.

Try to break the pipe, hammer, hydraulics, etc. They break the same way.

It is perceived structural strength.
*
not agree on sound dampener. sound/vibration travels easier over foam then air.

netmatrix
post Jul 27 2019, 12:43 PM

The machine... it sees everything.
*******
Senior Member
6,730 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Zion


QUOTE(changleonghao @ Jul 27 2019, 12:15 PM)
not agree on sound dampener. sound/vibration travels easier over foam then air.
*
We are talking about damping sounds. Not transmitting sounds. Do we need to go to sounds travels better in water now? C'mon. Give a better example for your words. If you can associate what you say to the problem/ situation in hand everyone would appreciate it a lot.
Sapphy
post Jul 27 2019, 03:31 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
1 posts

Joined: Aug 2017
Been reading this thread for awhile already. Been on the fence whether to do it or not. Currently on bmw f30 328i M sport with m adaptive suspension on m3 underbrace and ur strut bar.

So, my ride was pretty stiff. And i really do enjoy the firm and stiff ride, and looking for ways to further improve it while keeping the comfort unchanged as much as possible. That planted firm feeling when you take corners at high speed really is addicting. But daily driving it is a different story, given how bad our roads are in the city 😪. Reading how AF does help in reducing some noise and improve the chassis without weight penalty sounds really great. As you know, sound deadening materials are heavy. While searching for more info regarding chassis foamin, i came across this post in a bimmer forum.

I might drop by Desmond shop one of these days to hear what he would say. I kinda believe it works because bobby also sent his s4 there for chassis foaming hahah

QUOTE
Below is an extract of a writeup on chassis foaming from Sportcompactcar web, under their Project Nissan 300 Part 5.

" Foam-Filling the Chassis
In any high-performance car, it is impossible to make the chassis too stiff. The stiffer the chassis, the higher its natural frequency, making the energy imparted to it by bumps less likely to excite the body's structure. A stiffer chassis enables the use of stiffer springs and shocks without hurting the ride. This is because a stiff, non-flexing chassis transfers more force into the suspension where it can be dissipated by the springs and shocks instead of transferring the force to the occupants. A stiff chassis is also more responsive to roll rate tuning for balancing understeer and oversteer. This is one of the reasons why automotive engineers are continually investigating ways to stiffen chassis without adding weight.

In a final bit of reengineering to stiffen the body, we injected the chassis with catalyzed rigid structural polyurethane foam. Structural foam, in the 2 lb per cubic foot density that we used, can stiffen chassis members up to 40 percent.

Higher densities of foam can increase stiffness by up to 300 percent. Since we cannot retool custom parts to redo the Z's body, we figured that this would be an excellent, low-cost way of greatly increasing chassis stiffness. Injecting foam is not a new technique for chassis stiffening. The Infiniti Q45 uses this sort of foam in some of its chassis members to increase stiffness, as do a few other premium cars. In fact, the foam we chose is the foam recommended to repair damaged Q45s.

To get the correct foam for our project, we contacted Art Goldman, Foamseal's automotive product manager and author of an SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) paper on the use of structural foam for the stiffening of automotive unibody structures. We used Foamseal's two-component foam kit, p/n 11-22 to fill the main members of the chassis. Like we mentioned earlier, Foamseal is the supplier that I-CAR, a national certification group for quality auto repair, recommends for the repair of damaged, foam-filled chassis. The Foamseal kit uses a two-part catalyzed polyurethane foam, which quickly cures into rigid, waterproof, closed-cell foam. To prep the car, we carefully masked off all painted areas anywhere where the foam could drip. As this sort of foam is a thermosetting catalyzed plastic, we realized it could be icky if it spilled on paint or any part of the car's interior. This foam is nasty stuff. It is impervious to all known solvents and cleaners.

Rubber gloves must be worn. Get some of it on your hands and it will stay there for more than 3 weeks--don't ask how we know. Do not get this stuff on your paint. Wear old clothes; we ruined ours while learning how to handle the product. We injected the foam into the rocker panels and frame rails of Project Z through existing bolt and drain holes. When injected, the foam reacts like shaving cream and quickly expands to fill the empty space. You can judge how much foam to add by watching its expansion progress through some of the holes. Once injected, the foam expands and begins to cure in about a minute so you need to work fast and plan how you inject the foam before you start.

The life of the foam kit is limited to a few hours once the seal is broken. We filled all of the Z's unibody frame members using five foam kits. When foaming a chassis, you must remember the wires and other lines that pass through the chassis must be relocated or they will be entombed forever.

We were amazed at how this simple procedure improved the performance of the car. The chassis now almost feels like it has a roll cage. A sloped driveway can be driven up sideways with nary a creak. Even though the Z already has a pretty tight chassis, it feels more solid. The ride has improved and road noise has been reduced noticeably. We bet that the car will be even more responsive to chassis tuning measures in the future. If you are a slalom racer, a road racer, have a lowered car or even just want a smoother ride; foaming is a worthy, easy-to-do modification. Foamseal has foams in densities as high as 10 lbs per square foot if you desire to make things even stiffer.

Do not--I repeat--do not attempt to use cheap, hardware-store canned foam. This is not the same thing, and if injected into your chassis, will form a gummy mass that won't dry. Foamseal foam is a professional grade foam, which although it is a little unforgiving to cleanup mistakes, has superior mechanical properties and catalytic curing so it will dry even in an enclosed space...."

changleonghao
post Jul 28 2019, 09:28 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
152 posts

Joined: May 2019
QUOTE(Sapphy @ Jul 27 2019, 03:31 PM)
Been reading this thread for awhile already. Been on the fence whether to do it or not. Currently on bmw f30 328i M sport with m adaptive suspension on m3 underbrace and ur strut bar.

So, my ride was pretty stiff. And i really do enjoy the firm and stiff ride, and looking for ways to further improve it while keeping the comfort unchanged as much as possible. That planted firm feeling when you take corners at high speed really is addicting. But daily driving it is a different story, given how bad our roads are in the city 😪. Reading how AF does help in reducing some noise and improve the chassis without weight penalty   sounds really great. As you know, sound deadening materials are heavy. While searching for more info regarding chassis foamin, i came across this post in a bimmer forum.

I might drop by Desmond shop one of these days to hear what he would say. I kinda believe it works because bobby also sent his s4 there for chassis foaming hahah
*
Thg is, KL auto has no expertise on adjusting suspension to compensate. And for the amount paid, intangible benefits at best.
If ur car still under warranty, then autofoam voids it.
dares
post Jul 28 2019, 10:01 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(Sapphy @ Jul 27 2019, 03:31 PM)
Been reading this thread for awhile already. Been on the fence whether to do it or not. Currently on bmw f30 328i M sport with m adaptive suspension on m3 underbrace and ur strut bar.

So, my ride was pretty stiff. And i really do enjoy the firm and stiff ride, and looking for ways to further improve it while keeping the comfort unchanged as much as possible. That planted firm feeling when you take corners at high speed really is addicting. But daily driving it is a different story, given how bad our roads are in the city 😪. Reading how AF does help in reducing some noise and improve the chassis without weight penalty   sounds really great. As you know, sound deadening materials are heavy. While searching for more info regarding chassis foamin, i came across this post in a bimmer forum.

I might drop by Desmond shop one of these days to hear what he would say. I kinda believe it works because bobby also sent his s4 there for chassis foaming hahah
*
Local shops and their workers has nowhere near the expertise described in the article you quoted.

And don't believe everything Bobby says.
changleonghao
post Jul 28 2019, 10:09 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
152 posts

Joined: May 2019
QUOTE(dares @ Jul 28 2019, 10:01 AM)
Local shops and their workers has nowhere near the expertise described in the article you quoted.

And don't believe everything Bobby says.
*
Yeah, fat Bobby videos are shoddy, poor viewpoints and shoddy audio. He can’t talk properly also. Keeps on repeating.


Kon is much better, autobuzz team also very good.
dares
post Jul 28 2019, 10:35 AM

Enthusiast
*****
Junior Member
834 posts

Joined: Jul 2011
QUOTE(changleonghao @ Jul 28 2019, 10:09 AM)
Yeah, fat Bobby videos are shoddy, poor viewpoints and shoddy audio. He can’t talk properly also. Keeps on repeating.
Kon is much better, autobuzz team also very good.
*
Most importantly I often find him to be biased. I've seen him spin facts to fit his opinions.
SUSAllnGap
post Jul 28 2019, 11:37 AM

[ Modding with Passion(tm) ]
*******
Senior Member
4,561 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penangites



QUOTE(netmatrix @ Jul 27 2019, 11:50 AM)
Foam in crevices only works as sound dampener. It does not assist in structure integrity. You can do a simple test.

Fill a pipe either steel or plastic. Knock the pipe before you foam it up. You can hear the hollow sound.

Foam it up wait to cure. Then knock the pipe again. It sounds rigid & solid.

Try to break the pipe, hammer, hydraulics, etc. They break the same way.

It is perceived structural strength.
*
I think it does help in reducing flexing (aka stiffness) not structural strength.

This post has been edited by AllnGap: Jul 28 2019, 11:51 AM
SUSAllnGap
post Jul 28 2019, 11:44 AM

[ Modding with Passion(tm) ]
*******
Senior Member
4,561 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penangites



QUOTE(Sapphy @ Jul 27 2019, 03:31 PM)
Been reading this thread for awhile already. Been on the fence whether to do it or not. Currently on bmw f30 328i M sport with m adaptive suspension on m3 underbrace and ur strut bar.

So, my ride was pretty stiff. And i really do enjoy the firm and stiff ride, and looking for ways to further improve it while keeping the comfort unchanged as much as possible. That planted firm feeling when you take corners at high speed really is addicting. But daily driving it is a different story, given how bad our roads are in the city 😪. Reading how AF does help in reducing some noise and improve the chassis without weight penalty   sounds really great. As you know, sound deadening materials are heavy. While searching for more info regarding chassis foamin, i came across this post in a bimmer forum.

I might drop by Desmond shop one of these days to hear what he would say. I kinda believe it works because bobby also sent his s4 there for chassis foaming hahah
*
If you want stiffer ride, can opt to change to PU bushings on the whole car.

Whatever joints by default uses rubber to absorb vibrations. Changing it will make handling sharper (especially PU bush on lower arm) but also transfer all imperfections of the road to the car.

Recently changed my brother's nissan XGear crossmember bush to PU. The whole car is very firm at the moment. But when going pass uneven road will make drivers feel dizzy cuz the car oscillates quite a lot. (Cuz it's near to SUV height)

I think your car is stiff enough d since it's M sport.
If you wanna enhance its change your lower arm bush to PU for sharper steering feedback.

This post has been edited by AllnGap: Jul 28 2019, 11:47 AM

30 Pages « < 23 24 25 26 27 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0225sec    0.55    5 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 8th December 2025 - 11:34 AM