yeah! at last... upgraded to fiber optic. hope to view a good result soon.

Highlights from low-tier Draft-N roundup (disclosure: affiliated, though interpretation/conclusions may not reflect stated views):
-Only 32 simultaneous connections, compared to 80 for the next lowest device. This is not a router you want to use BitTorrent with.
-50% throughput loss when using WEP/WPA.
-Shorter range than comparable devices. May be sufficient for small apartments, but you may experience problems w/ multifloor locations.
-On the bright side, you're likely to be using G clients. Wireless throughput is within 30% of reaching performance provided by high-end equipment.

Auto-QoS wasn't supported at the time of the review, but was added to the latest firmware (for hardware revision B2). It's not a bad router, as its overall performance, although lower than everything else, is only behind by a small margin. The dismal number of simultaneous connections is a step back to 2003 though; for this reason I wouldn't recommend its use in anything more than households w/ 1-2 concurrent users.

Dlink DIR-615
Review:
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/view/30387/96/
Basically it's worrying to use this router for torrenting :/

Dlink DIR-615
Review:
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/content/view/30387/96/
Basically it's worrying to use this router for torrenting :/

to be honest, you can use a G-based router for fibre-based network connection. Virgin UK offered me a NETGEAR G router along with their 20mbps fibre network service, so I don't really see a problem using a G-based router on a FTTH connection. Unless if you're pc is way too far away from your router i suppose....XD

I smell throttling coming when commercially available...lol

They will throttle, or if they don't throttle they'll give data cap on their internet connection...
Imagine Phone + HDTV + HSI without limitations..