QUOTE(tsg_7 @ Sep 17 2009, 03:03 PM)
CMOS should be noisier at higher ISO right?
but should the built-in motor in lense is better than built-in body?
built-in lense AF more quicker, silent and less vibrating. if using d90 with built-in lense will it be better quality image capture or juz the same?
plz correct me if im wrong in any statement i've made.
LOL...im here to ask u all bout the opinion as im goin to get 1...and since is a d90 thread i hope there's no bias at all
u r right...what if the motor break down? will the AF work if i get a built-in motor lense??
LOL...where can get?i asked foto honey shop which located at lumut it cost RM4k juz d90 with kit...nth else!!!
darn!!
To be fair, I have not come across a D3000 high ISO comparison against the D90/D5000. There is however a comparison by Uncle Ken on the D40 against the D5000 etc. The D3000 sensor I suspect is derived from the D60 sensor which is derived from the D40.
D40 High ISO ComparisonShould the built-in lens motor be better than in-body motor? Yes it should. In theory, the lens motor can be designed and optimized for the glass that it needs to move. Meaning big/powerful/fast motor for big glass elements, small cheaper motors for kit lenses. In body motor is one size fits all. The in body motor will have to work the lens regardless of its size.
The downside of in lens motor is the cost. Each SWM lens you buy have additional cost for the motor. If lens include VR, then the glass elements will probably have to be bigger to accommodate the movements required for VR. Bigger lens, bigger filters, bigger cost. If your start to buy a few lenses, these will add up pretty fast.
What happens if lens motor losak? Can still focus or the motor will jam up lens focusing?

Wah. This I dunno coz I don't have any lens that have motor. But I'm pretty sure that my D lens can still work in manual focus mode.