lol, i saw that purple thingy, din realized it until u said it ...
blue tint that i mentioned can be seen at the mouth/nose area.. just my noob comments and personal preference...i saved a copy and did some editing ...nice pic..hope u dun mind me saving it:)

This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Sep 3 2009, 02:44 PM

SB600... i dont think the SB28 supports iTTL.

---

Added on September 3, 2009, 2:44 pmlighter, u got the tokina 11-16..did u compare any other uwa lenses before buying?

This post has been edited by alpha_company: Sep 3 2009, 02:44 PM

yea i realized the bush a little bit kacau also.. hehe


nope i never compare others just get comment from other tokina owner and read alot of reviews.. kenrockwell says buy tokina 11-16 so i bought this..

this lens really really cool in terms of image quality..

No problem Yeah I noticed the blue cast over it as well. Ahh well, some liked it, some don't haha I would have corrected it if i noticed it earlier

I owned an 11-16 Tokina months ago. Its great. Then i fell in love with Nikon 12-24 (and hated 11-16 end to end) and i live happily ever after

I thought that bluish purple tint on that yawning lion is natural.

This post has been edited by the_tranny: Sep 3 2009, 03:01 PM

actually the tokina 11-16 f/2.8 i don't really use the f/2.8 always f/5.6 for my minimum. Even with f/2.8 it doesn't make much bokeh coz it's UWA lens. I just love the clarity that's why i bought this lens..

yupp i agree...its very subjective and boils down to personal preference ...WB is just a reference, as long as u like it..

i prefer something like that:


None the less, a good shot can be PP to anything, urs is a sharp and good one I realized that you shot it at 300mm f/4...what lens were u using?
70-200??:

This post has been edited by Sp00kY: Sep 3 2009, 03:10 PM

what's the advantage of the nikon 1224 other than the afs motor and longer focal length upto 24mm?

---

Added on September 3, 2009, 3:16 pmwell..maybe as it says la.. a prime nikon 300mm f/4...wooohooo

This post has been edited by alpha_company: Sep 3 2009, 03:16 PM

Other than what you just said ? ...
Professional opinion : I have none.
Personal opinion : Its Nikon

lol it was. err as natural as i shot it But I can't confirm if Mr Lion was blueish on that day I'll ask him the next time. Maybe it was the Monday blues.

Haha exactly as you see it. Its the AF Nikkor 300mm f/4. Old piece of glass. I think YL now has a used AF-S version for sale.

zio : AFS 300mm for howmuch?

Listed there at RM3980. I got the non-AFS version for RM2k.

sorry to quote but i was also trolling this subject and expecting something good... mana tau..

what is the different between 80-200 f2.8 and 70-200f2.8
huge gap between the price

First thing is VR....
and if u are referring to the AF 80 - 200....the 70 200 comes with AFS...perf wise im not sure

oh, wah!
extra 2k for VR

anyone using 80-200 f2.8??

a random shot I took last weekend with AF-D 80-200 f/2.8 two touches. nothing spectacular.

i suppose is the coating, VR & built in lens AF-S motor that add up the extra 2k.
but image quality wise..i think not much different.

some of my 80-200mm shots.
My Flickr AFD 80-200mm (2 Touch)

Atmospheric Emo


LYN Gallery HERE!

Flickr Complete Series HERE!

quiet thread and im bored: