This post has been edited by edtan5: Aug 31 2009, 02:54 PM
Nikon D90 v4, First DSLR with HD video recording
Nikon D90 v4, First DSLR with HD video recording
|
|
Aug 31 2009, 02:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,524 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: from mlk with lub |
V4
This post has been edited by edtan5: Aug 31 2009, 02:54 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 31 2009, 04:24 PM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,524 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: from mlk with lub |
imo,
they normally call the current available AFD 80-200 as the two touch version. Mark III sounds so kenon-ish |
|
|
Sep 3 2009, 06:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,524 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: from mlk with lub |
|
|
|
Sep 4 2009, 08:59 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,524 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: from mlk with lub |
the moon
![]() D90 80-200mm f/2.8 AF-S @ 200mm 1/500sec f/5.6 ISO200 |
|
|
Sep 5 2009, 12:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,524 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: from mlk with lub |
QUOTE(jsc_tidus @ Sep 4 2009, 11:05 PM) yup... it is not sharp to me too cropped at 100% QUOTE(calvin_gsc @ Sep 4 2009, 11:58 PM) f/5.6 is not enough depth of field to capture the moon. I'd recommend using a minimum of f/7.1-f/11. My sharpest had been with f/13 using the 80-200mm af-d two touch. hi sifu! yeah it was not sharp ![]() Exposure: 0.025 sec (1/40) Aperture: f/13 your moon so far is the best coz the detail on the moon surface it sharp duno why mine kinda disappoint me next mth moon cake fest try again when the moon is blardy big |
|
|
Sep 6 2009, 02:14 AM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,524 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: from mlk with lub |
The Grand Mosque
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « Camera: Nikon D90 Exposure: 0.001 sec (1/2000) Aperture: f/8.0 Focal Length: 32 mm ISO Speed: 200 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 6 2009, 11:59 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,524 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: from mlk with lub |
QUOTE(calvin_gsc @ Sep 6 2009, 02:15 AM) few reasons for it:1. my lens is covered with vapor coz of condensation 2. it is 12pm direct sunlight killed much detail 3. my pp killed the colours 4. most important point is, i'm still noob. need more practice ori pic » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « |
|
|
Sep 7 2009, 03:04 AM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,524 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: from mlk with lub |
QUOTE(FirezZ @ Sep 6 2009, 05:30 PM) hi just checking... between these 2 lens.. which one would be "acceptable" for you guys ? 28-75mm will not be wide enough if you only have this lens on your body. but if u intend to get a wide lens, 28-75mm is a great day2day lens tamron 28-75mm f2.8 tamron 17-50mm f2.8 (non motor) guess it is hard to find a new unit for non motor of 17-50mm for my D90 but... is it still a good lens afterall ? i don have 2nd cam. or no intention to get a downgrade type, so non motor is still acceptable for my D90 right ? i saw there are a few posts, people selling the non motor 17-50mm for more or less USD 300 for 2nd hand unit but requires postage from hk or US. Whereby locally here (msia) it costs around rm 1.4K for that does it worth it a ? |
|
|
Sep 7 2009, 12:05 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,524 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: from mlk with lub |
|
|
|
Sep 11 2009, 05:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,524 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: from mlk with lub |
i agree too, taking photograph has to be moderate. it really irritates seeing the same guy taking pics non stop since beginning till the end (addition: bursting) in any occasion
flash also is kinda irritating in halls and dark places. few is ok... non stop is |
|
|
Sep 24 2009, 02:44 PM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,524 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: from mlk with lub |
QUOTE(Hongraphics @ Sep 24 2009, 08:50 AM) owner here... it's a decent lens i'll say. at f/4 and above it produces great pics. f/2.8 will be softer.price is cheap sample pic at my flickr with tammy 28-75mm : flickr QUOTE(KTCY @ Sep 24 2009, 08:54 AM) it is sharp. lately shoot bunch of pics at f/8 and the sharpness amazed mebut of course most of the lens at f/8 is sharp |
|
|
Sep 24 2009, 05:51 PM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,524 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: from mlk with lub |
|
|
|
Sep 29 2009, 02:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,524 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: from mlk with lub |
QUOTE(silverwave @ Sep 28 2009, 09:26 PM) Haha, D90 group should have a TT. seconded for D90 TT or group shootingI personally bought D90 as my first DSLR instead of cheaper models because it's awesome with many good features. Video is a bonus QUOTE(Sp00kY @ Sep 29 2009, 08:29 AM) yup, i agree too. but the range is a little short. alternative can be nikor 10-24mmQUOTE(Hongraphics @ Sep 29 2009, 09:49 AM) imo, there is no siggy 10-22mm correct?closest is sigma 10-20mm? QUOTE(KTCY @ Sep 29 2009, 11:36 AM) yeah, 14-24mm seems to be the best UWA so far <-imo but having 14-24mm on a APS-C sensor cam is not really wide |
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 2 2009, 06:57 PM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,524 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: from mlk with lub |
remember to post some pics at the air show guys
|
|
|
Oct 3 2009, 01:40 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,524 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: from mlk with lub |
QUOTE(faiz92 @ Oct 3 2009, 11:48 AM) Wah,u got 17-55 DX? imo, 11-16mm tokina too have distortion, but easily fixed with photoshop.Tokina at 11-16mm not much distortion compare with sigma? thank god u advise me not to buy,almost buy that lens last week. 10-20mm sigma's distortion is uneven and hard to fix. anyway, these are just stuffs read in internet. you need to ask the real users or go down to the shop and try one |
|
|
Oct 4 2009, 03:12 PM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,524 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: from mlk with lub |
wow... it does look pretty ugly
|
|
|
Oct 5 2009, 12:39 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,524 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: from mlk with lub |
QUOTE(calvin_gsc @ Oct 5 2009, 04:08 AM) If there is nothing wrong with the camera, there is no need for it. changing shutter mechanism maybe? but that only when it fails Usually people bring it in to clean dust in sensor. That is the most common "service" that most people refer to. There is no weekly, monthly, or yearly service required for the camera. The only service I usually perform myself is wipe the body and lenses clean, blow dust away from lenses, and if there is dust on sensor, try to blow it away with a handheld air blower. |
|
|
Oct 20 2009, 12:21 PM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,524 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: from mlk with lub |
QUOTE(bunney @ Oct 20 2009, 12:01 PM) ive tried it already, many many times, erm, the motor in the lens makes a sound, but the lens doesnt hunt, aiya. erm, can warranty cover this? try clean the contact point, or try another lensbetter to bring to nikon SC to let them check. if warranty not expired you should be able to repair it |
|
|
Oct 21 2009, 07:57 AM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,524 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: from mlk with lub |
QUOTE(tsg_7 @ Oct 20 2009, 07:09 PM) just to share my friend's experience in mudahhe made a deal and send his lens to "SOUTH AFRICA" turn out that guy still does not pay after sending him the fedex receipt he have to ask fedex return the lens to him but i think my friend is quite dumb to belief the guy so easily so be careful in mudah.com |
|
|
Oct 21 2009, 02:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,524 posts Joined: Apr 2006 From: from mlk with lub |
you guys know which shop have a bigger range of benro tripods?
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.0379sec
1.03
7 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 12:14 PM |