Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Bump Topic Topic Closed RSS Feed
126 Pages « < 116 117 118 119 120 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Photography Nikon D40/D40x/D60/D5000 V5, Best entry level DSLR from Nikon

views
     
ReasonsofThanatos
post Sep 3 2009, 03:18 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
256 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Zero to Hero



oo...but i've got an offer from a member here,selling genuine nikon D60 kit + some accesories at RM2k...so it is worth the deal? or if D3000 is RM2k as well then which is better?
xcrue
post Sep 3 2009, 03:37 PM

xcrue
*******
Senior Member
2,150 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(alpha_company @ Sep 3 2009, 03:05 PM)
THE pic is overexposed at the top portion which is the sky..really bright there. u should PP it or maybe next time decrease the exposure by one stop and see the results and also meter at the sky rather than at the ground which will make the sky look as it should be. try and test around with those settings.
I do not suggest buying either sigma/tamron 18-200 as at the tele end (200mm) the aperture goes to f/6.3..it's really slow. Worst still for tamron because it it has a micro type motor which is slower than built in body motor like in d90 and af-s lenses.

i cant really recommend u anything because im not sure what u want and what ur budget is.

Budget?
Do you want an all rounder - like 18200/18250/18270 but scarifices IQ and focus lock speed.
OR
A tele zoom like 55-200 or 70-300 and dont mind exchanging between lenses..

again..what is your budget?


Added on September 3, 2009, 3:11 pm

to be honest im not sure now as the d3000 jsut came out. the d3000 is now around rm2K for the kit. d60 should have a lower price by now...but i dont really know.
*
Im budgeting less than RM2k for the lens

Btw..what do you meat by all rounder - like 18200/18250/18270? all-in-one lens?
like this ?
All-In-One Zooms

AF18-200mm F/3.5-6.3 XR Di-II LD Aspherical (IF) Macro = RM1050
AF18-250mm F/3.5-6.3 Di-II LD Aspherical (IF) Macro = RM1640

Does it meant we can zoom and macro ?

Planning to get a std prime lens and zoom/macro kit smile.gif

Actually 55-200 is not bad..still considering either 55-200 or 18-135..
tongue.gif

This post has been edited by xcrue: Sep 3 2009, 03:57 PM
alpha_company
post Sep 3 2009, 04:06 PM

One Hand Punch Mega
*******
Senior Member
4,016 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing



QUOTE(ReasonsofThanatos @ Sep 3 2009, 03:18 PM)
oo...but i've got an offer from a member here,selling genuine nikon D60 kit + some accesories at RM2k...so it is worth the deal? or if D3000 is RM2k as well then which is better?
*
is it new? ap set or nikon malaysia set?

d3000 is better...tell him u can get d3000 at the same price...
Zi-Tech
post Sep 3 2009, 04:20 PM

Eh, pangkat sudah tukar ka
*****
Senior Member
774 posts

Joined: Jun 2008
From: Shah Alam, Selangor/ Gambang, Kuantan, Pahang



is it d3000 available at the market rite now???
ReasonsofThanatos
post Sep 3 2009, 05:12 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
256 posts

Joined: Nov 2004
From: Zero to Hero



QUOTE(alpha_company @ Sep 3 2009, 04:06 PM)
is it new? ap set or nikon malaysia set?

d3000 is better...tell him u can get d3000 at the same price...
*
erm...he said that the warranty is given by nikon malaysia...1 year...ok i'll tell him that..thx ^^, but im still looking for one below 2k...any suggestions?
abuariff
post Sep 3 2009, 05:47 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
10 posts

Joined: Apr 2005


QUOTE(Zi-Tech @ Sep 3 2009, 04:20 PM)
is it d3000 available at the market rite now???
*
I just dropped by at Fotokem, Bintang Maju and Best Denki at Mines yesterday on my way home, none of them have D3000 yet. I just saw D5000 at all shops in which really tempting me to get one. Budget-wise, i need to wait another couple of week, most likely D3000 will arrive. Raya will come soon too! ayya...

You guys, any preferred shops to go shopping for this photography thingy in terms of good customer service, reasonable price?
dugong81
post Sep 3 2009, 08:31 PM

New Member
*
Newbie
3 posts

Joined: Jan 2008
im a newbie in dslr. I just got myself a D5000. So far i love it. Simple to use for a noob like me.
arm4102
post Sep 3 2009, 11:45 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
4 posts

Joined: Jul 2009


QUOTE(alpha_company @ Sep 3 2009, 06:19 AM)
whatt?? it's only around RM5.8k body only.. a D700 will cost you around RM7.7k. big diff there..

if lets say the price is almost the same (which in reality it doesnt), if you're buying a FX D700, you're not just buying a better body but u must also buy better FX lenses which costs a lot more..yup u can use a DX lens on FX body (it will auto change to DX mode), but then why buy a FX body in the first place..


Added on September 3, 2009, 6:25 am

do u want a tele zoom lens? the tamron 70-300 or sigma 70-300 is cheap but it doesnt have VR which in my opinion are most useful at ranges above 100mm. i dont really recommend any of these lenses.

I would suggest the Nikon 55-200VR for that price. Yes it has shorter focal length, but it has a better IQ (image quality) and VR to reduce handshake effect while shooting.

The Nikon 70-300VRii is more expensive but it has superb image quality and also a newer VRii.
*
what is the price for 55-200VR lens?? where can i get this lens??


Added on September 3, 2009, 11:46 pm
QUOTE(dugong81 @ Sep 3 2009, 08:31 PM)
im a newbie in dslr. I just got myself a D5000. So far i love it. Simple to use for a noob like me.
*
better check ur cam at nikon for confirmation of call back batch.. i just sent mine today, and everything is ok..yehaaa

This post has been edited by arm4102: Sep 3 2009, 11:46 PM
jsc_tidus
post Sep 4 2009, 12:33 AM

Vader's Nephew
******
Senior Member
1,930 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: The Grid



QUOTE(abuariff @ Sep 3 2009, 05:47 PM)
I just dropped by at Fotokem, Bintang Maju and Best Denki at Mines yesterday on my way home, none of them have D3000 yet. I just saw D5000 at all shops in which really tempting me to get one. Budget-wise, i need to wait another couple of week, most likely D3000 will arrive. Raya will come soon too! ayya...

You guys, any preferred shops to go shopping for this photography thingy in terms of good customer service, reasonable price?
*
why wait? regret later, buy now laugh.gif

theres alot of camera shop at bb plaza sweat.gif
persona68
post Sep 4 2009, 02:56 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
106 posts

Joined: Dec 2008
From: Teh Internetzz


QUOTE(abuariff @ Sep 3 2009, 05:47 PM)
I just dropped by at Fotokem, Bintang Maju and Best Denki at Mines yesterday on my way home, none of them have D3000 yet. I just saw D5000 at all shops in which really tempting me to get one. Budget-wise, i need to wait another couple of week, most likely D3000 will arrive. Raya will come soon too! ayya...

You guys, any preferred shops to go shopping for this photography thingy in terms of good customer service, reasonable price?
*
u could try the photo shop at lot 10 @ ground floor.
photo bilion or photo plus. cant remember though tongue.gif
got my D5000 from there
alpha_company
post Sep 4 2009, 07:10 AM

One Hand Punch Mega
*******
Senior Member
4,016 posts

Joined: Mar 2005
From: ★MALAYSIA★ Status: Photographing



QUOTE(xcrue @ Sep 3 2009, 03:37 PM)
Im budgeting less than RM2k for the lens

Btw..what do you meat by all rounder - like 18200/18250/18270? all-in-one lens?
like this ?
All-In-One Zooms

AF18-200mm F/3.5-6.3 XR Di-II LD Aspherical (IF) Macro = RM1050
AF18-250mm F/3.5-6.3 Di-II LD Aspherical (IF) Macro = RM1640

Does it meant we can zoom and macro ?

Planning to get a std prime lens and zoom/macro kit smile.gif

Actually 55-200 is not bad..still considering either 55-200 or 18-135..
tongue.gif
*
1. Yes, all in one zooms would make travelling easier/lighter because you dont need to carry a lot of lenses, but the negative side is that all in one zoom lenses have reduced IQ (image quality) and do not have a fast focus lock speed.

2. DO NOT BELIEVE all the "Macro" markings on lenses like tamron and sigma. IT IS NOT A TRUE MACRO! Newbies and even some seasoned photographers that i have met are tricked into believing that their lenses with "Macro" on it can do real macro. It is just a better close up lens and that's it. A real macro lens would cost a lot more and macro lenses are basically "Prime" lenses with fixed aperture. e.g Nikon 60mm f/2.8, Nikon 105mm f/2.8 and the famous Tamron 90mm f/2.8. Real macro lenses are not zoom lenses which like the 18-200mm, 18-55mm etc.

3. For a budget of around RM1.9K you can get a 2nd hand Nikon 18-200VR f/3.5-5.6. Notice that at the tele end, 200mm that the nikon has a faster f/5.6 rather than the slow f/6.3 of Tamron & Sigma. The Sigma/Tamron 18-200mm lenses are not impressive at all as it doesnt have VR, lower IQ and slower with f/6.3 at tele end compared to Nikon 18-200mm but of course it is cheaper.

4. With a shorter zoom lens like the Nikon 18-105VR, 55-200VR and 70-300VRii you will get a higher IQ (image quality) and have a faster focus lock speed. The Nikon 18-135mm (D80 kitlens) is not that good compared to the Nikon 18-70 (D70 kitlens) & Nikon 18-105VR (D90 kitlens)


BOTTOM LINE - Decide whether you want to have versatility over IQ & focus speed OR vice versa.
If you want versatility/lightweight, decide on an all in one zooms.
If you want IQ and focus speed, decide on a standard zoom.
If you want much better IQ, decide on a prime lens + a standard zoom.

Tell me what u want & i can give a much better solution.
My suggestion for now:
1. Nikon 18-105VR / Nikon 18-70 + 55-200VR (IQ Wise)
2. Sigma 18-200/18-250 HSM + Nikon 35mm f/1.8 (Versatility wise)

ps. these are some that i would recommend because of their performance and AF with bodies like D5000/D60.

Nikon AFS 55-200mm VR - RM 9xx (New) RM 6xx (2nd hand)
Nikon AFS 18-105mm VR - RM 11xx (New) RM 700-RM850 (2nd hand)
Nikon AFS 18-70mm - RM 11xx (New) RM 700 (2nd hand)
Nikon AFS 70-300mm VR - RM 19xx (New) RM 13xx-15xx (2nd hand)
Sigma 18-250mm OS HSM - RM 23xx (New)
Tamron 18-270 VC - RM 23xx (New)
Nikon 35mm f/1.8 - RM 8xx (New) - Prime lens
Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 - RM 15xx (New) - Macro lens

This post has been edited by alpha_company: Sep 4 2009, 08:05 AM
calvin_gsc
post Sep 4 2009, 07:22 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
10,261 posts

Joined: Jan 2003


QUOTE(alpha_company @ Sep 1 2009, 12:52 AM)
contemplating the right uwa for me.. either the tokina 11-16 f/2.8 or the sigma 10-20..which is the best bang for my buck?

the sigma is the widest i can get at 10mm but the tokina has a fixed aperture at f/2.8. hmmm..built quality, IQ which is better?
*
I have used Sigma 10-20mm, Tokina 12-24mm f/4 and now Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8.

IMHO, Tokina has the better build. The sigma is only sharp wide open. When you stop it down to even f/11, the sides are significantly softer than the center. I think you may have mentioned you don't like distortions. So, that leaves you only once choice, which is the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8.
The Apprentice
post Sep 4 2009, 07:38 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
501 posts

Joined: Sep 2005


May I know the continuous drive/ burst buffer size for D40 raw? Is the rate 2.5 fps for its raw?

Is it worth to get a used D40 now? Thanks.
heLL[tuRt]
post Sep 4 2009, 08:01 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
365 posts

Joined: Mar 2007
From: Puchong, Selangor


alpha_company,thanks for the long yet useful info,really appreciate it rclxms.gif thumbup.gif
doritezza
post Sep 4 2009, 08:49 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
13 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(calvin_gsc @ Sep 4 2009, 07:22 AM)
I have used Sigma 10-20mm, Tokina 12-24mm f/4 and now Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8.

IMHO, Tokina has the better build. The sigma is only sharp wide open. When you stop it down to even f/11, the sides are significantly softer than the center. I think you may have mentioned you don't like distortions. So, that leaves you only once choice, which is the Tokina 11-16mm f/2.8.
*
anybody using Tokina AT-X 124 PRO DX II here? since it has built in motor for D5000 and lower end model, how the comparison between this lens and sigma 10-20 HSM? iinm, this is only the 3rd party wide angle lens that can be af on non motor body.am i right?

I heard that tokina 11-16 f/2.8 is the best wide angle lens but unfortunately it cannot af on my d60 cry.gif
xcrue
post Sep 4 2009, 09:01 AM

xcrue
*******
Senior Member
2,150 posts

Joined: Jan 2003

QUOTE(alpha_company @ Sep 4 2009, 07:10 AM)
1. Yes, all in one zooms would make travelling easier/lighter because you dont need to carry a lot of lenses, but the negative side is that all in one zoom lenses have reduced IQ (image quality) and do not have a fast focus lock speed.

2. DO NOT BELIEVE all the "Macro" markings on lenses like tamron and sigma. IT IS NOT A TRUE MACRO! Newbies and even some seasoned photographers that i have met are tricked into believing that their lenses with "Macro" on it can do real macro. It is just a better close up lens and that's it. A real macro lens would cost a lot more and macro lenses are basically "Prime" lenses with fixed aperture. e.g Nikon 60mm f/2.8, Nikon 105mm f/2.8 and the famous Tamron 90mm f/2.8. Real macro lenses are not zoom lenses which like the 18-200mm, 18-55mm etc.

3. For a budget of around RM1.9K you can get a 2nd hand Nikon 18-200VR f/3.5-5.6. Notice that at the tele end, 200mm that the nikon has a faster f/5.6 rather than the slow f/6.3 of Tamron & Sigma. The Sigma/Tamron 18-200mm lenses are not impressive at all as it doesnt have VR, lower IQ and slower with f/6.3 at tele end compared to Nikon 18-200mm but of course it is cheaper.

4. With a shorter zoom lens like the Nikon 18-105VR, 55-200VR and 70-300VRii you will get a higher IQ (image quality) and have a faster focus lock speed. The Nikon 18-135mm (D80 kitlens) is not that good compared to the Nikon 18-70 (D70 kitlens) & Nikon 18-105VR (D90 kitlens)
BOTTOM LINE - Decide whether you want to have versatility over IQ & focus speed OR vice versa.
If you want versatility/lightweight, decide on an all in one zooms.
If you want IQ and focus speed, decide on a standard zoom.
If you want much better IQ, decide on a prime lens + a standard zoom.

Tell me what u want & i can give a much better solution.
My suggestion for now:
1. Nikon 18-105VR / Nikon 18-70 + 55-200VR (IQ Wise)
2. Sigma 18-200/18-250 HSM + Nikon 35mm f/1.8 (Versatility wise)

ps. these are some that i would recommend because of their performance and AF with bodies like D5000/D60.

Nikon AFS 55-200mm VR - RM 9xx (New) RM 6xx (2nd hand)
Nikon AFS 18-105mm VR - RM 11xx (New) RM 700-RM850 (2nd hand)
Nikon AFS 18-70mm - RM 11xx (New) RM 700 (2nd hand)
Nikon AFS 70-300mm VR - RM 19xx (New) RM 13xx-15xx (2nd hand)
Sigma 18-250mm OS HSM - RM 23xx (New)
Tamron 18-270 VC - RM 23xx (New)
Nikon 35mm f/1.8 - RM 8xx (New) - Prime lens
Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 - RM 15xx (New) - Macro lens
*
Thanks lot Alpha smile.gif
Appreciate your details explainations and guide man thumbup.gif . Will use it as a bible or guide for my lens upgrade smile.gif
I think IQ option is much better ,maybe i will go for Nikon 18-105VR / Nikon 18-70 + 55-200VR (IQ Wise) + either Nikon 35mm f/1.8 or 50mm f/1.8 primelens smile.gif


This post has been edited by xcrue: Sep 4 2009, 09:11 AM
project-o
post Sep 4 2009, 10:48 AM

PROJECT-O
******
Senior Member
1,182 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
I would like to present a different opinion. To me, I would go straight for the 18-105VR and forget about the 18-70/55-200. The newer 18-105 is more than a match for the 18-70 optically only loses in build quality and the 55-200VR micro motor doesn't do much good for the AF. If you are getting the 35 f1.8 forget the 50 f1.8 unless you have budget constraints.
QUOTE(xcrue @ Sep 4 2009, 09:01 AM)
Thanks lot Alpha smile.gif
Appreciate your details explainations and guide man thumbup.gif  . Will use it as a bible or guide for my lens upgrade smile.gif
I think IQ option is much better ,maybe i will go for Nikon 18-105VR / Nikon 18-70 + 55-200VR (IQ Wise) + either Nikon 35mm f/1.8 or 50mm f/1.8 primelens smile.gif
*
raptorclans
post Sep 4 2009, 11:44 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
333 posts

Joined: Nov 2006
From: Puchong


Yeah mine's using the 18-105VR and personally it offers me a good balance.

Regarding the 35mm, should I go for that or save up for the 50mm?
(got poisoned the other day) tongue.gif
Sp00kY
post Sep 4 2009, 12:02 PM

Look at all my stars!!
*******
Senior Member
3,366 posts

Joined: Oct 2005
QUOTE(project-o @ Sep 4 2009, 10:48 AM)
I would like to present a different opinion. To me, I would go straight for the 18-105VR and forget about the 18-70/55-200. The newer 18-105 is more than a match for the 18-70 optically only loses in build quality and the 55-200VR micro motor doesn't do much good for the AF. If you are getting the 35 f1.8 forget the 50 f1.8 unless you have budget constraints.
*
I tot 55-200 is running on SWM?
wcs2798
post Sep 4 2009, 01:15 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
673 posts

Joined: Nov 2008


user posted image

btw,d3000 is already available in market

126 Pages « < 116 117 118 119 120 > » Top
Topic ClosedOptions
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0348sec    0.90    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 15th December 2025 - 03:45 PM