QUOTE(navigator @ Feb 13 2009, 06:20 PM)
You may refer to my post #723 for a detail & root cause.
Whatever cooling you have will not help unless you have a cooling system so powerful that you can let the chip keep staying @ room temperature.
The xbox360 is not substandard at all in technology perspective~! it's well ahead of it's time when it's launched in year 2005. It was too rushed for the design and ended up the system is seriously flawed.
It's not a failed product considering they are the 1st system to pack so many power in the system in that time and till date the hardware sales is still ahead of it's major competitor.
in year 2005, a gaming hardware with a graphic power similar to X1800XT is a technology feat.
The Jasper is finally reached 97% manufacturing yield compared to any of the previous which indicate that the Jasper *might* be the preferred hardware design.
The one really substandard is the nVidia G86 graphic chip which is not sensitive to the issue already hitted the xbox360 on 2006 and repeated the exact same mistake after so many years......

Your post #723 links to articles indicating the use of substandard materials in the construction, which I've mentioned is part of the primary cause of hardware failures.
It may have been well ahead of its time when launched, but that does not mean the design is not substandard. To have placed the GPU and heatsink under the media drive, that was a huge stroke of compromise. That, amongst other things fundamental to the basic operation of the machine, was not given the development and design it really needed, and therefore the entire machine suffered as a result. While they may have succeeded in winning the race with the PS3, it has come at an obvious cost.
It was never a failed product, just a flawed product. Marketing and PR ensured that some holes were patched, but given the poor initial yields, there's bound to be a lot of consumer backlash and lost goodwill towards Microsoft. Come the next generation of consoles in the future, there may be the possibility that MS would've won this battle, only to have lost the war.
And yes, while packing in that much performance into 2005 hardware might've been a technological feat, making it all reliable would've been an even greater feat. It's hardware, it's designed to work within certain tolerances, but MS can be assured that public consumer opinion has even finer tolerances.
While Jasper may look promising, the underlying framework is still flawed from the beginning, so as a consumer, my hope would be that they address ALL the key issues involved, and not patch one or two holes only to leave other holes wide open (unfortunately the xclamps are still there). The time to make excuses for this machine has passed, MS has already acknowledged that with their extended warranty.
It's just a sad sad thing that the current console with the best software and community infrastructure happens to be the one with the greatest fundamental hardware issues. Jasper may be a shining beacon, but is it too little too late?