Pentium Dual Core E5200, new processor has arrived!
|
|
 Nov 24 2008, 12:49 PM
|
 
All Stars
10,530 posts Joined: Nov 2004 From: Petaling Jaya & Mid Valley  
|
QUOTE(seanlimys @ Nov 24 2008, 10:27 AM) well..based on ur rig..8800gts shud be on par or slightly better or lower den 9800gt..is it g80 or g92? mayb 8800gts sli can be compared to 9800gtx+ perhaps? i love sli setup but..i dun find additional juice for the card is a necessity.. GTS 320 is the older G80 core..... |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 24 2008, 09:34 PM
|
Senior Member
2,395 posts Joined: Mar 2008 From: Up in the Sky
|
QUOTE(hilmiangah @ Nov 24 2008, 03:12 AM) what are u waiting for then. i'm afraid it won't fit inside my casing..if u are on a tight budget hyper 212 is under RM130 now. refer pic here: http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?act=Atta...=post&id=683987 |
|
|
Nov 25 2008, 12:12 AM
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
good luck for e5200 ocers..
|
|
|
Nov 25 2008, 08:27 AM
|
Senior Member
2,023 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Muddy Estuary
|
1 more good point tat e5200 have is....its only got 2mb cache compare to e8 with 6cache...tats make it run cooler than e8....
GTG |
|
|
Nov 26 2008, 03:53 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,395 posts Joined: Mar 2008 From: Up in the Sky
|
Actually, E5200 OC perform on par with E8400 if we eliminate the cache thingy...
|
|
|
Nov 26 2008, 10:50 PM
|
|
Junior Member
26 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Kuching
|
hey Shah_15, u using e5200 with the gigabyte g31 motherboard, did u need to flash the bios to the latest version???
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 2008, 02:46 AM
|
|
Senior Member
2,395 posts Joined: Mar 2008 From: Up in the Sky
|
QUOTE(kl8610 @ Nov 26 2008, 10:50 PM) hey Shah_15, u using e5200 with the gigabyte g31 motherboard, did u need to flash the bios to the latest version??? no need at all...i just install it and it work like charm...heck, if need to flash latest version, i'll do it since it just easy process. |
|
|
Nov 28 2008, 10:36 PM
|
|
Junior Member
26 posts Joined: Sep 2008 From: Kuching
|
ok, thanks at all
|
|
|
Nov 28 2008, 10:55 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
QUOTE(Shah_15 @ Nov 26 2008, 03:53 PM) Actually, E5200 OC perform on par with E8400 if we eliminate the cache thingy... no matter how u oc..u still cant get the fsb high...it wont be on par..nvr...how can a 4ghz 1280fsb and 4ghz 1777fsb challenge? |
|
|
 Nov 28 2008, 11:43 PM
|
 
VIP
18,182 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Dagobah
|
QUOTE(seanlimys @ Nov 28 2008, 10:55 PM) no matter how u oc..u still cant get the fsb high...it wont be on par..nvr...how can a 4ghz 1280fsb and 4ghz 1777fsb challenge? Can always use the pin mod method for automatic higher FSB.  |
|
|
Nov 28 2008, 11:45 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,395 posts Joined: Mar 2008 From: Up in the Sky
|
QUOTE(seanlimys @ Nov 28 2008, 10:55 PM) no matter how u oc..u still cant get the fsb high...it wont be on par..nvr...how can a 4ghz 1280fsb and 4ghz 1777fsb challenge? The master has spoken....heck, read my post thoroughly. I mention e5200 oc is on par with e8400 STOCK.....QUOTE(lex @ Nov 28 2008, 11:43 PM) Can always use the pin mod method for automatic higher FSB. |
|
|
Nov 28 2008, 11:48 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
QUOTE(Shah_15 @ Nov 28 2008, 11:45 PM) The master has spoken....heck, read my post thoroughly. I mention e5200 oc is on par with e8400 STOCK..... bro..u did not mention the "STOCK" word...so i assume both mentioned are oced.. |
|
|
Nov 28 2008, 11:57 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,395 posts Joined: Mar 2008 From: Up in the Sky
|
QUOTE(Shah_15 @ Nov 26 2008, 03:53 PM) Actually, E5200 OC perform on par with E8400 if we eliminate the cache thingy... QUOTE(seanlimys @ Nov 28 2008, 11:48 PM) bro..u did not mention the "STOCK" word...so i assume both mentioned are oced.. haha...read my post above...is there i mention e8400 oc?? no la bro...hehe.. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 29 2008, 12:32 AM
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
thats the thg i would like to say..u put up the word oc...so its like two model oc...
well..assume...u were saying stock...e8 series would nvr be e8 IF u eliminate the cache...but seriously, i guess it would be unfair for u to leave out the cache... |
|
|
Nov 29 2008, 01:46 AM
|
|
Senior Member
2,395 posts Joined: Mar 2008 From: Up in the Sky
|
stop this e5200 vs e8400 bashing hehe....hey guys, any of you managed to clock 4.0ghz?
|
|
|
Nov 29 2008, 07:15 AM
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
i tink normal value ram will do the job if 4000 is 320*12.5..but now depending on the chip
|
|
|
Nov 29 2008, 10:46 AM
|
Senior Member
2,657 posts Joined: Feb 2008 From: Highbury House, 75 Drayton Park, London
|
QUOTE(Shah_15 @ Nov 29 2008, 01:46 AM) stop this e5200 vs e8400 bashing hehe....hey guys, any of you managed to clock 4.0ghz? Will the e5200 perform well with no OC? just normal only? or must OC to get max performance? |
|
|
Nov 29 2008, 07:14 PM
|
|
Senior Member
2,395 posts Joined: Mar 2008 From: Up in the Sky
|
QUOTE(seanlimys @ Nov 29 2008, 07:15 AM) i tink normal value ram will do the job if 4000 is 320*12.5..but now depending on the chip yeah but my mobo only allow 12x multiplier..QUOTE(ericpires @ Nov 29 2008, 10:46 AM) Will the e5200 perform well with no OC? just normal only? or must OC to get max performance? Of course it perform well with no OC...right now i just use stock clock but OC-ed the ram a little.... |
|
|
Dec 1 2008, 12:23 AM
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
QUOTE(ericpires @ Nov 29 2008, 10:46 AM) Will the e5200 perform well with no OC? just normal only? or must OC to get max performance? well...2mb cache and 800fsb juz same like like e4XXX series...juz wif 45nm processing...if given a choice for choosing retail or oem proc, i would really go to e6600 oem... |
|
|
Dec 1 2008, 04:18 PM
|
Senior Member
1,298 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: utopia
|
hi guy i dunno this is the right thread to ask o not
which 1 is better in gaming P E5200 vs AMD 5600+ x2 |
| Change to: |  0.0265sec
 0.77
 6 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 14th December 2025 - 02:47 AM |
Quote