means quite nice proc to play lo...12.5 multi..wonder if can hit 10*400 oso enuf...haha..but the matter is how bout the vcore?
Pentium Dual Core E5200, new processor has arrived!
|
|
 Oct 7 2008, 10:45 AM
Return to original view | Post
#1
|
 
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping  
|
|
Quote|
|
|
|
|
Oct 7 2008, 10:52 AM
Return to original view | Post
#2
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
vcore?got alot say 1.29 can go on 4ghz ad...means on air still can kua..not so bad i guess..
|
|
|
Oct 7 2008, 02:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#3
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
well..wif high multi and high fsb..sure u can reach sumthg more rite?leaves u more option to oc...well..compared to e6300 and this, i tink e6300 is a 65nm?
|
|
|
Oct 7 2008, 02:37 PM
Return to original view | Post
#4
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
okok...good luck..and post ur screenies..
|
|
|
Oct 7 2008, 03:38 PM
Return to original view | Post
#5
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
sumore its a 2mb cache..shud do fine...how isit compared to C2D E4XXX?
|
|
|
Oct 7 2008, 03:45 PM
Return to original view | Post
#6
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
without cooler?u will go no where...hahaa...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2008, 08:16 AM
Return to original view | Post
#7
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
yea...wanna noe bout the temp and vcore....
|
|
|
Oct 11 2008, 07:10 PM
Return to original view | Post
#8
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
lol..nice oc result...and good review...mayb at 1.4 able to hit 500*8?if u opting for high fsb lar...but i will go for high fsb, lowering the multi, and up the fsb..
|
|
|
Oct 11 2008, 10:00 PM
Return to original view | Post
#9
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
p2d is like between celeron adn c2d...so its brother of celeron with larger cache..hahaha...430*12.5? hmmphh...den cheapo ram shud do the job...333*12.5...
|
|
|
Oct 12 2008, 12:36 AM
Return to original view | Post
#10
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
lol..thermal paste not distributed evenly..haha..well...nice oc there
|
|
|
Oct 12 2008, 07:51 AM
Return to original view | Post
#11
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
lol..i oso bad luck in getting good chip...last time get one e2140 m0 tempang, even 360fsb cudnt achieve
|
|
|
Oct 13 2008, 09:03 AM
Return to original view | Post
#12
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
means u got a gem den..good luck
|
|
|
Oct 13 2008, 03:52 PM
Return to original view | Post
#13
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
lol..yea...i 2nd tat...and yet this proc has low vcore...thx to 45nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 18 2008, 08:22 AM
Return to original view | Post
#14
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
QUOTE(lotiman2003 @ Oct 17 2008, 12:53 PM) The CPU is 2.5Ghz right? But Vista is showing 1.9Ghz. I tried to set the multiply in BIOS (G31 mobo) but the max is 12X200Mhz = 2.4Ghz. Any thought? check ur EIST or C1E settings in the bios..its the kind of the intel seepdstep techology..reduces multiplier when idling and uses all multiplier at load... |
|
|
Oct 22 2008, 06:20 PM
Return to original view | Post
#15
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
e5200 is a budget proc and can reach high speed but will not be able to reach high fsb..thats a letdown
|
|
|
Oct 29 2008, 12:33 AM
Return to original view | Post
#16
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
depends on wat board..like dfi bloodiron p35 t2l cannot run 45nm proc...u nid to plugin 65nm proc to flash bios den oni can run 45nm proc
|
|
|
Nov 5 2008, 11:22 PM
Return to original view | Post
#17
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
wah..how to kick e8400's butt?come on..this proc is juz 2mb cache?wanna war wif 6mb cache?
|
|
|
Nov 6 2008, 08:37 AM
Return to original view | Post
#18
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
wel...its u saying and quoting it...i cant comment...2mb cache and 6mb cache is totally a different thg...4ghz e2200 will give u about 1452fsb..compared to e8400 stock 3.0ghz 1333fsb...btw, 4ghz achieveable in 11X or 8X?
|
|
|
Nov 7 2008, 01:42 PM
Return to original view | Post
#19
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
tats the point..how could possibly a 4ghz, wif less den 1333mhz fsb and 2mb cache beat a 3.0, 1333fsb and a 6mb l2 cache?
|
|
|
Nov 7 2008, 08:54 PM
Return to original view | Post
#20
|
|
Senior Member
2,751 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Taiping
|
yea..thats the thg..like i say...cannot compare performance at all....hahahha
|
| Change to: |  0.0331sec
 0.57
 7 queries
 GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 11:14 PM |
All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)
Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.