Intel Q9xxx and Xeon 33x0 Family

Lowyat.NET forums

Lowyat.NET Kopitiam Garage Sales

Lowyat.NET Rules and Regulations FAQ Help Search Members

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Lowyat.NET -> Overclockers United

Bump Topic Add Reply RSS Feed

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Intel Q9xxx and Xeon 33x0 Family, Show the rest what Intel Quadies can do!

views

huzai	Dec 26 2008, 05:40 PM Return to original view \| Post #1
Getting Started Junior Member 197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Shah Alam	Q9400 user reporting in(am I the only one using Q9400 in here? lol) managed to OC till 440FSB, vcore 1.280v IBT passed mobo : dfi lt x48 t2r screenshot.. » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

huzai	Dec 26 2008, 05:55 PM Return to original view \| Post #2
Getting Started Junior Member 197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Shah Alam	QUOTE(owikh84 @ Dec 26 2008, 05:51 PM) Why ur temp is that low? I really dont know, is it bad? btw, Smartguardian showing +5 to 8 celcius compare to Realtemp, which one should i trust? This post has been edited by huzai: Dec 26 2008, 05:57 PM
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

huzai	Dec 26 2008, 07:51 PM Return to original view \| Post #3
Getting Started Junior Member 197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Shah Alam	QUOTE(hengmy @ Dec 26 2008, 07:33 PM) how much vtt u set? do u change the cpu ref and nb ref? or leave it auto? here is my setting » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « CPU Feature Thermal Management Control: Disabled PPM(EIST) Mode: Disabled Limit CPUID MaxVal: Disabled CIE Function: Disabled Execute Disable Bit: Disabled Virtualization Technology: Disabled Core Multi-Processing: Enabled Exist Setup Shutdown: Mode 2 Shutdown after AC Loss: Disabled CLOCK VC0 divider: AUTO CPU Clock Ratio Unlock: Enabled CPU Clock Ratio: 8 Target CPU Clock: 3520 CPU Clock: 440 Boot Up Clock: Auto DRAM Speed: 400/800 Target DRAM Speed: 850 PCIE Clock: 100mhz PCIE Slot Config: 1X 1X CPU Spread Spectrum: Disabled PCIE Spread Spectrum: Disabled SATA Spread Spectrum: Disabled Voltage Settings CPU ViD Control: 1.26v CPU VID Special Add: Auto DRAM Voltage Control: 1.900v SB Core/CPU PLL Voltage: Default NB Core Voltage: 1.50v CPU VTT Voltage: 1.25v Vcore Droop Control: Enabled Clockgen Voltage Control: 3.45v GTL+ Buffers Strength: Strong Host Slew Rate: Weak GTL REF Voltage Control: Enabled x CPU GTL1/3 REF Volt: 110 x CPU GTL 0/2 REF Volt: 105 x North Bridge GTL REF Volt: 85 DRAM Timing Enhance Data transmitting: AUTO Enhance Addressing: AUTO T2 Dispatch: Enabled Clock Setting Fine Delay Ch1 Clock Crossing Setting: AUTO DIMM 1 Clock fine delay: Current DIMM 2 Clock fine delay: Current Ch 1 Command fine delay: Current Ch 1 Control fine delay: Current Ch2 Clock Crossing Setting: AUTO DIMM 3 Clock fine delay: Current DIMM 4 Clock fine delay: Current Ch 2 Command fine delay: Current Ch 2 Control fine delay: Current Ch1Ch2 CommonClock Setting: Auto Ch1 RDCAS GNT-Chip Delay: Auto Ch1 WRCAS GNT-Chip Delay: Auto Ch1 Command to CS Delay: Auto Ch2 RDCAS GNT-Chip Delay: Auto Ch2 WRCAS GNT-Chip Delay: Auto Ch2 Command to CS Delay: Auto CAS Latency Time (tCL): 4 RAS# to CAS# Delay (tRCD): 4 RAS# Precharge (tRP): 4 Precharge Delay (tRAS): 12 All Precharge to Act: AUTO REF to ACT Delay (tRFC): AUTO Performance LVL (Read Delay) (tRD): AUTO Read delay phase adjust: Enter Ch1 Read delay phase (4~0) Channel 1 Phase 0 Pull-In: Auto Channel 1 Phase 1 Pull-In: Auto Channel 1 Phase 2 Pull-In: Auto Channel 1 Phase 3 Pull-In: Auto Channel 1 Phase 4 Pull-In: Auto Ch2 Read delay phase (4~0) Channel 2 Phase 0 Pull-In: Auto Channel 2 Phase 1 Pull-In: Auto Channel 2 Phase 2 Pull-In: Auto Channel 2 Phase 3 Pull-In: Auto Channel 2 Phase 4 Pull-In: Auto MCH ODT Latency: AUTO Write to PRE Delay (tWR): AUTO Rank Write to Read (tWTR): AUTO ACT to ACT Delay (tRRD): AUTO Read to Write Delay (tRDWR): AUTO Ranks Write to Write (tWRWR): AUTO Ranks Read to Read (tRDRD): AUTO Ranks Write to Read (tWRRD): AUTO Read CAS# Precharge (tRTP): AUTO ALL PRE to Refresh: AUTO I get great help from clunk's forum, also the template i use were from his website BTW, i ran OCCT before and I failed lol I'll try up the vtt and gtl later
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

huzai	Dec 26 2008, 08:03 PM Return to original view \| Post #4
Getting Started Junior Member 197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Shah Alam	QUOTE(hengmy @ Dec 26 2008, 07:58 PM) before i tried can stable at 1.34vtt 1.34vtt at 450fsb is it? ----------edited------------ oh ya, u added the screenshot lol, ic.. 1.34vtt quite high isnt it? i want to try 450, later dude This post has been edited by huzai: Dec 26 2008, 08:04 PM
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

huzai	Dec 26 2008, 09:33 PM Return to original view \| Post #5
Getting Started Junior Member 197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Shah Alam	wah.. cannot go to 450fsb , I think thats the limit, maybe my mobo back to 440fsb setting with 1 notch up to vcore
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

huzai	Dec 26 2008, 09:50 PM Return to original view \| Post #6
Getting Started Junior Member 197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Shah Alam	can go to 450fsb actually,but need alot of vcore, i rather keep vcore below 1.3 and vtt below 1.3 lol btw, about GTL refs, which guide that you follow? or you got your own calculation? lol Clunk's GTL guide for LT-UT X48 were 67% of VTT http://www.clunk.org.uk/forums/hardware/32....html#post12436 And i calculated for GTL 1/2, GTL 0/3, NB GTL myself and i got this formula lol GTL 1/2 = (Real VTT * 67%) / 0.00724 GTL 0/3 = (Real VTT * 67%) / 0.0078 NB GTL = (Real VTT * 67%) / 0.0097 but you have to 'genapkan' those numbers to 3 digits lol dunno my calculation is right or not, pls advice thanks
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

huzai	Dec 27 2008, 03:16 AM Return to original view \| Post #7
Getting Started Junior Member 197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Shah Alam	QUOTE(hengmy @ Dec 26 2008, 10:19 PM) i use 63% for the gtl ref, 67% is for 65nm i guess. the dfi bios setting use number instead of the 0.00xx like other mobo use, so even can calculate also hard to determine in the number? btw i tried clunk before but not allow me to get stable setting, but using 63% can get more stable setting its not that hard actually to calculate lets say 1.35v vtt = 1.310v (real) so for GTL 1/2 (1.310 * 67%) / 0.00724 0.8777 / 0.00724 = 121.229xxxx genapkan = 120 dunno right or not hehe
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

huzai	Dec 27 2008, 03:20 PM Return to original view \| Post #8
Getting Started Junior Member 197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Shah Alam	QUOTE(hengmy @ Dec 27 2008, 11:51 AM) hmm, 0.877 is what thing ? btw, i have found the clunk graph is not real, they seen like provide wrong real vtt value. anantech provide correct real vtt value for dfi x48, however i have tried but still not work for quad Added on December 27, 2008, 11:51 am so the fsb limit on where for a quad on x38? nope, im using it without problem, 0.877 is 67% from real VTT (1.350 in bios, real vtt 1.310) http://www.clunk.org.uk/forums/hardware/32....html#post12436 btw, running 440fsb at 1.25vtt 1.28vcore Ibt passed, Prime 8 hours passed screenshot » Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... « This post has been edited by huzai: Dec 27 2008, 03:25 PM
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

huzai	Dec 27 2008, 10:23 PM Return to original view \| Post #9
Getting Started Junior Member 197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Shah Alam	QUOTE(hengmy @ Dec 27 2008, 04:22 PM) nice result, i mean the table wont work well for 450 fsb.. about the 0.00724 in the formula there, this figure is?? and for anantech, they measured diff real vtt from clunk for your board, dunno if i see wrong thanks! oh for 450fsb maybe you're right 0.00724v = 1 for GTL 1/2 you got the link for anandtech?
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

huzai	Dec 30 2008, 04:16 AM Return to original view \| Post #10
Getting Started Junior Member 197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Shah Alam	QUOTE(hengmy @ Dec 27 2008, 10:46 PM) here is the link http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.aspx?i=3294&p=14 i feel the real vtt measure here more accurate, as it show same as H/W in bios i think u use this real vtt to calculate might give u a surprise? thanks bro for the link, cannot boot to windows using anandtech gtl guide lol, its not suitable for me i think haiya, is there any real calculation for this gtl setting for dfi board?
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

huzai	Dec 30 2008, 10:29 PM Return to original view \| Post #11
Getting Started Junior Member 197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Shah Alam	QUOTE(reiben05 @ Dec 30 2008, 02:32 PM) my quads at 3.4ghz ... same proccessor and motherboard with huzai T.T" , 425fsbx8= 3.4ghz at 3.12v (shown in cpu-z and bios reading) trying to get to 3.6ghz but so far seems to crash after 2-3 minits of stress test D:, with the following voltage settings set the ram at 1:1 ratio CPU Vidd: 1.4v CPU Vidd Special Limit: Enable CPU Vidd Special Limit Add: Auto NB Core : 1.55v SB Core/CPU PLL: 1.51v FSB VTT: 1.45v RAM VDIMM: 2v GTL Ref Voltage Control : disabled (systems seems too be unstable if i enable this) CPU GTL 1/2 Ref Volt : 113 (unchangeable since i disable voltage control) CPU GLT 0/3 Ref Volt : 100 (same here) North Bridge GTL Ref Volt : 100 (same here) hello ! finally lol! good luck overclocking your Q9400 i only managed to get 3.52ghz with the proc stable T_T, hope you can do better! This post has been edited by huzai: Dec 30 2008, 10:39 PM
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

huzai	Dec 31 2008, 03:33 AM Return to original view \| Post #12
Getting Started Junior Member 197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Shah Alam	im facing this kind of problem right now, i've overclocked to 450fsb and adjusting everything back, but i do have the same preset for 440fsb which is stable, run prime,occt,ibt passed and then, when i reload the 440fsb preset back, all of those program crash,failed,windows reboot, not stable at all i wonder why.. damn it man!
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

huzai	Dec 31 2008, 05:16 PM Return to original view \| Post #13
Getting Started Junior Member 197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Shah Alam	QUOTE(tkh_1001 @ Dec 31 2008, 02:58 PM) might be a sign of proc degradation? are u using ibt very often? proc degradation? not very often.. but i ran 4 times before, 2 = 10 loops pased, 2 = 20 loops passed now all gone.. T_T
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

huzai	Dec 31 2008, 07:23 PM Return to original view \| Post #14
Getting Started Junior Member 197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Shah Alam	QUOTE(hengmy @ Dec 31 2008, 07:09 PM) so fast degrade? btw, i found that ibt was not good for testing quad, coz quad calculate too fast.. ican pass 10 loops ibt but cant pass 1 hour prime I really hope IBT sucks lol Now Im running prime95
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

huzai	Dec 31 2008, 07:43 PM Return to original view \| Post #15
Getting Started Junior Member 197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Shah Alam	QUOTE(hengmy @ Dec 31 2008, 07:37 PM) it not so good for quad mayb, or u need run 30 loops like that to pass prime for a few hours.. but for dualcore, 10 loops ady can prime at few hours thanks for your info btw, what are cpu degrading symptom?
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

huzai	Jan 1 2009, 04:36 PM Return to original view \| Post #16
Getting Started Junior Member 197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Shah Alam	Im really confused right now, passed Prime95 for 8 hours, but cannot pass IBT , wth is happening..
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

huzai	Jan 1 2009, 10:33 PM Return to original view \| Post #17
Getting Started Junior Member 197 posts Joined: Apr 2005 From: Shah Alam	QUOTE(AceCombat @ Jan 1 2009, 09:14 PM) IBT is a real torture test,8 hours prime/OCCT is equal to 15 minutes IBT only iirc. im more confused now @metatsu : no, never tested IBT at lower clock, i'll try thanks! @hengmy yes, 100% available ram
Card PM	Report Top Like Quote Reply

« Next Oldest · Overclockers United · Next Newest »

Add Reply Options

Change to:

0.0365sec

0.97

7 queries

GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 9th December 2025 - 02:03 PM

All Rights Reserved © 2002- 2025 Vijandren Ramadass (~unite against racism~)

Removal Request

Powered by Invision Power Board © 2025 IPS, Inc.