QUOTE(shinchan^^ @ Sep 18 2008, 10:01 AM)
nikonrumor.com D40/x/D60 Thread V4, The saga continues...
D40/x/D60 Thread V4, The saga continues...
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 10:02 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
435 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: KL Kepong |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 10:04 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,889 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Kelana Jaya |
QUOTE(darthbaboon @ Sep 18 2008, 09:10 AM) Tried to charge my camera battery today and found out that I misplaced it somewhere. Must've lost it during the trip overseas... Buy over my D40, I bundle the charger for you For some reason I have the charger cord but not the charger body itself. Just altogether weird. Anyone knows where I can find some 2nd hand or cheap chargers around? D40's been in the market for a long time... these things should be in ample supply. QUOTE(shinchan^^ @ Sep 18 2008, 10:01 AM) Nikon Rumours website I believe. |
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 10:48 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
540 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Kuala Lumpur |
QUOTE(Darkcursed @ Sep 18 2008, 09:55 AM) ebernie ! hmm,wanna check with you where did you purchase your sigma 30mm?interested with this lens and what it can do. but kinda worry on it's performance,build. I bought it by scurrying around in 2nd hand forums (yes, it's 2nd hand). Build is good, much better than the nikkor 50mm f1.8 or f1.4. Totally sealed lens with no moving parts. It's also all metal, and is heavier than your regular prime. 62mm diameter so it looks mightily large on your camera. When I bought it, I brought along a laptop and printed a focusing chart to check for focus errors. Shot at f1.4 - f2 and the lens is OK so I bought it im planning to get a prime lens,interested with sigma because at 30mm,is a creative point where u can actually did more than 50mm prime.i wanna wait for the all new nikkor AF-S 50mm f1.4 price before making any decision. If is darn expensive,i rather go for sigma.I wonder did shops like YL or J-one does sell it locally,my last visit to j-one i check with the tauke and he say it must be order,been checking the internet some user actually buy it from ebay hk for less than rm1500 include shipping fees. Performance wise, as long as there's no focusing errors it's a darn handy lens. It's best at f1.8 and above. At f1.4 it is *slightly* soft but still a very good lens. Don't hesitate to shoot wide open, just make sure you focus correctly. At f1.4, you can shoot without flash in most situations, even at night. P/S: most lens (dare I say all? Maybe except the old Nikkor 35mm f2) is softer wide-open than stopped down. Also, after using this lens, I realize that it's no replacement for a 50mm. 50mm is very suited as a short portrait lens (plus at f1.x, you get good bokeh). 85mm too (but a tad long-ish for me though). So no doubt I'm now hunting for an el-cheapo 50mm f1.8 as a portrait lens. Just a shout out too - anyone with a 70-210 f4 AF (not e-series) do contact me. I want a budget telephoto with constant aperture. This post has been edited by ebernie: Sep 18 2008, 10:52 AM |
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 11:12 AM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
2,063 posts Joined: May 2005 From: Tatooine |
QUOTE(zio @ Sep 18 2008, 10:04 AM) Lol... I also wanna get rid of the D40X le... buy yours pulak... 2x D40 doesn't make a D80 ok. Similarly 8x D40 doesn't make a D300 This post has been edited by darthbaboon: Sep 18 2008, 11:12 AM |
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 12:47 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
21,256 posts Joined: Jan 2003 From: Pekopon |
D40 + D40 = D80
nice maths D40 X 7.5 sets = D300 |
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 01:55 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
QUOTE(Darkcursed @ Sep 18 2008, 09:55 AM) ebernie ! hmm,wanna check with you where did you purchase your sigma 30mm?interested with this lens and what it can do. but kinda worry on it's performance,build. Sigma 30mm cost RM 1,350 at Penang im planning to get a prime lens,interested with sigma because at 30mm,is a creative point where u can actually did more than 50mm prime.i wanna wait for the all new nikkor AF-S 50mm f1.4 price before making any decision. If is darn expensive,i rather go for sigma.I wonder did shops like YL or J-one does sell it locally,my last visit to j-one i check with the tauke and he say it must be order,been checking the internet some user actually buy it from ebay hk for less than rm1500 include shipping fees. QUOTE(ebernie @ Sep 18 2008, 10:48 AM) I bought it by scurrying around in 2nd hand forums (yes, it's 2nd hand). Build is good, much better than the nikkor 50mm f1.8 or f1.4. Totally sealed lens with no moving parts. It's also all metal, and is heavier than your regular prime. 62mm diameter so it looks mightily large on your camera. When I bought it, I brought along a laptop and printed a focusing chart to check for focus errors. Shot at f1.4 - f2 and the lens is OK so I bought it @ bold : 70-200 VR sharp @ wide open Performance wise, as long as there's no focusing errors it's a darn handy lens. It's best at f1.8 and above. At f1.4 it is *slightly* soft but still a very good lens. Don't hesitate to shoot wide open, just make sure you focus correctly. At f1.4, you can shoot without flash in most situations, even at night. P/S: most lens (dare I say all? Maybe except the old Nikkor 35mm f2) is softer wide-open than stopped down. Also, after using this lens, I realize that it's no replacement for a 50mm. 50mm is very suited as a short portrait lens (plus at f1.x, you get good bokeh). 85mm too (but a tad long-ish for me though). So no doubt I'm now hunting for an el-cheapo 50mm f1.8 as a portrait lens. Just a shout out too - anyone with a 70-210 f4 AF (not e-series) do contact me. I want a budget telephoto with constant aperture. |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 02:12 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,637 posts Joined: Jan 2003 |
|
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 02:24 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
66,500 baht is expensive
I got the price RM 5,900 only. This post has been edited by KTCY: Sep 18 2008, 02:24 PM |
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 03:31 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
540 posts Joined: Dec 2004 From: Kuala Lumpur |
|
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 05:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
|
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 05:52 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
lol... ebernie said it was softer wide open than stopped down..you are just proving his statement lol...
|
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 06:17 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
All Stars
12,505 posts Joined: May 2007 From: Triumph in the Skies Status:In LoV3 Again |
Seriously la
70-200 is sharp at wide open |
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 06:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
4,889 posts Joined: Jan 2005 From: Kelana Jaya |
ala apa sharp or sharper nih
The 70-200mm is sharp wide open and so is the 24-70mm. I believe the 14-24mm also sharp wide open. Holy trinity ftw! |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 07:34 PM
|
![]()
Junior Member
41 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: KL |
yo bro orenzai, pls add me into d60 user list!!!
jt bought at j-one... |
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 09:33 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
i know its sharp...the world knows its sharp...but at f2.8, it is LESS sharper THAN f4...thats all it is...so its sharper at f2.8 and sharpest at f4
|
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 10:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
7,214 posts Joined: Oct 2006 From: Kamino |
QUOTE(orenzai @ Sep 18 2008, 09:33 PM) i know its sharp...the world knows its sharp...but at f2.8, it is LESS sharper THAN f4...thats all it is...so its sharper at f2.8 and sharpest at f4 so it's not soft?then why do u keep saying it is soft? if a lenses is sharp...it is sharp... it doesnt mean that if it is sharper at f4...it is soft at f2.8.... btw.... do u even know wat u r talking about? have u even tried the trinity....to simply say it's soft wide open? not ALL lenses are soft wide open.... ONLY THE CHEAP ONES ARE! especially third party e.g. sigma,tamron,etc. |
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 10:20 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
okok let me use other examples... i say a BMW which costs 500k is cheaper than a mercedese tat cost 600k... but that doesnt mean that the BMW is cheap right? it is just cheaper than the merc but still very expensive... hehe... get what i mean? Added on September 18, 2008, 10:21 pmoh and you said that not all lenses are softer at wide open then nvm lo...coz i was just trying to interpret what ebernie is saying lar This post has been edited by orenzai: Sep 18 2008, 10:26 PM |
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 11:14 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
1,397 posts Joined: Sep 2006 |
|
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 11:16 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Senior Member
3,114 posts Joined: Dec 2006 |
added you in the list..that line learnt from the recent debate that was aired on ntv7 about the land scam thingey
|
|
|
Sep 18 2008, 11:59 PM
|
![]() ![]() ![]()
Junior Member
435 posts Joined: Jul 2005 From: KL Kepong |
|
|
Topic ClosedOptions
|
| Change to: | 0.2934sec
0.73
5 queries
GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 16th December 2025 - 05:40 AM |