QUOTE(raynman @ Oct 8 2008, 06:16 PM)
Hi Navigator,
Did I give you the impression that the AMT failures experienced by a high percentage of Savvy AMT owners are due to design flaw?
My suggestion for a recall is not in response to a design flaw in the AMT system, but more to the fact that, how should I say,
some "low quality" components could have been used during the localization process that cannot withstand the passage of time.
Probably due to the heat and humidity in our environment.
The only design flaw that Proton can be accused of would be the mass failures of their Campro engine.
You really gave me such impression until your reply above. thanks for clearing that out.Did I give you the impression that the AMT failures experienced by a high percentage of Savvy AMT owners are due to design flaw?
My suggestion for a recall is not in response to a design flaw in the AMT system, but more to the fact that, how should I say,
some "low quality" components could have been used during the localization process that cannot withstand the passage of time.
Probably due to the heat and humidity in our environment.
The only design flaw that Proton can be accused of would be the mass failures of their Campro engine.
But I also quite disagree for low quality as Proton Savvy are undergone a TUV certification process and AFAIK that covers part supplier/vendor....
May I know where can I get the source for things like warranty claim or major repair statistics for Proton Savvy?
I would also like to know the design flaw for the Campro engine as I'm also a Gen.2 owner for now and frankly speaks, it never gave me any fault, FC nor performance issue so far except there's a time that the Lambda sensor contaminated. Thanks.
Oct 9 2008, 08:21 PM

Quote
0.0320sec
1.15
6 queries
GZIP Disabled