QUOTE(overthemoon747 @ Apr 26 2010, 06:30 PM)
barrister-at-law=law degree+bvc+pupillage.am i rite?so if we choose to practise in msia later on,we do not have to do chambering again rite?i read it somewhere online that we have to repeat it and it totally freaked me out.cant seem to find that page animore tho.forgot where i'd seen it.so i nid u guys' help.lol.
btw,i'm tinking about doing law in australia and i realised that most students tend to go for a combined degree.does anyone know why it's more popular?
i initially planned to enrol in the LLB(4years) but the popularity of the 5yr combined degree makes me a little bit curious and i kinda wonder if i'm on the rite track.=)
If im not mistaken, for most universities in Australia, an LLB with Hons will take 4 years (the only one I know which is less is Bond). If that is so, taking another year, and with extra extra hard work you'll get 2 qualifications. Makes sense to me. btw,i'm tinking about doing law in australia and i realised that most students tend to go for a combined degree.does anyone know why it's more popular?
i initially planned to enrol in the LLB(4years) but the popularity of the 5yr combined degree makes me a little bit curious and i kinda wonder if i'm on the rite track.=)
But if you do intend to return to Malaysia and practice, Imho I wouldn't take that route. It'll take you 2 more years to get admitted than a regular UK or Local grad. Yes, you may have another qualification, but I do think that law firms especially the big ones don't really give much for paper other than your LLB and a few directly relevant courses like LLM or the BPTC. But this is just a preliminary conclusion of mine. For example, I was told by a prominent tax lawyer, Partner at a 3 S firm in KL, that the fact I am an ACCA member was detrimental to my chances of being a tax lawyer for certain reasons. Furthermore, he mentioned that the LLM does not add as much value to a practitioner as the 1 year experience he may have forgone to take the course and this was reiterated by a fellow partner at the same firm. What matters more is the date of admission. I agree with his latter statement, but the former still puzzles me.
If you do intend to combine an LLB with something, do a business "like" qualification. In the legal world, you need a fair amount of knowledge on marketing, management and such (esp if you intend to have your own firm). That's why I strongly believe, the best Masters to supplement an LLB is an MBA (or something of that sort).
But of course if u intend to settle in Australia, go ahead with the 5 year prog.
May 1 2010, 01:08 PM

Quote
0.0310sec
0.34
6 queries
GZIP Disabled