2650 for v400 is overpriced meh?

okle....since it is still new...sure little bit higher...but still ok...juz expensive few bucks

Just wondering Panasonic TX-37LX80M RM3380 is a good price?

A friend of mine bought it lately, saw it and it seem good.
As my parents are thinking of getting one soon to replace the aging CRT TV, what your comment on this model?

Or any better buy around RM3500 mark?

I'm a noob to LCD TV world.

good price....buy frm me le...
but depends on wat is the main purpose u use the tv

look Sony Hosts XBR8 LED LCD vs. Plasma Shootout (You'll Never Guess Who Wins)

Based on the picture, it is quite obvious the plasma was tweaked for poorer quality. Just look at overbright, and washed colours on the plasma. As usual, old trick to beat other competitors.

Guys, Samsung LA37S81B for RM2999 is it worth it? Or the LG 7LC7R for RM2950 is a better option?

LG 37LC7 looks better

I would say that 37S81 aint worth. Reason : Obsolete. Better opt for Panny 37LX80MK.

Why would the Panny be better? What is the price are they comparable? Thanks =D

panny 37LX80 is RM3300++

newer model, newer features, better results.

Hi guys, I use tv more for playing dvdrip/hdrip/bdrip movies from comp, which LCD TV is more value for money? I prefer > 40" one.

Btw, using HD3870 video card now.

Thanks

Any 42 PY800H owner around ? I need more feedback before I go ahead

i tot u tested the PS3 on PY800 in PJ shop d??

---

Added on June 21, 2008, 9:47 amif LCD tv is above > 40"...i dont think is value for money d.

example, samsung 46A550 RM7999, panasonic 50PV80 RM7999.

This post has been edited by iamsobloodysick: Jun 21 2008, 09:47 AM

toshiba Av500 37" beter or Panasonic 37" beter? From the price list i see from Adrians thread...the price differs greatly lah......

This post has been edited by Jaroque: Jun 21 2008, 11:12 AM

hmm....different for around 300 bucks

what panasonic model are you saying?

37LX80 or 37LX800?

if 37LX800 is better than 37LX80 man

wow....58 thread of info on price and technical stuffs...will need to go through slowly..

but got some simple questions la....hope sifus here dont mind answer..sorry if soalan bodoh..

i am thinking of getting a flatscreen between 46-50 inch, viewing distance about 12-15ft...
at present, got a 29 CRT...

is it true if i watch ASTRO 90%, then no point getting flat screen? Of course the `feeling classy' factor of flatscreen is wonderful but i am thinking about the quality of the pictures...my question is when watching Astro, is the quality of flatscreen < than CRT?
some shop say must get special cable, some shop say must not buy full HD...



This post has been edited by nando: Jun 21 2008, 05:11 PM

it is true that the quality of crt is much much better than lcd n plasma,,,

super cable?haha...not improved much..even if u buy the cable that cost u rm1000..the quality still worse than crt

full hd?nex 5yrs only buy oso wont so late

so memang if watch Astro, all flatscreen (no matter what brand/setting/cable) will have LESSER pic quality than CRT?

what about SAME pic quality leh? got hope or not?

hahahaha...trying extra hard to justify possibility of investing into flatscreen...hahah

---

Added on June 22, 2008, 12:03 amphew...just finished reading the 58 thread...head also pusing pusing..

now i know..if Astro (sports) and DVD...plasma seems okay la..especially the famous Panny plasma PV80...quite a number of people buy here..
but will also check out the samsung...

if got $$...hehehe Pioneer le....

This post has been edited by nando: Jun 22 2008, 12:05 AM