Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

43 Pages « < 32 33 34 35 36 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

Movies LOTR & Hobbit Movies Thread, NOW: THE BATTLE OF THE FIVE ARMIES

views
     
crazy_labelle
post Dec 18 2013, 06:38 PM

New Member
*
Junior Member
18 posts

Joined: Feb 2009
QUOTE(xphossis @ Dec 18 2013, 08:55 AM)
Does IMAX have subtitle? Anyone?
*
no subtitle.. i watch in tgv 1u..

xphossis
post Dec 18 2013, 11:24 PM

Me Gusta!
*****
Senior Member
878 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL
QUOTE(crazy_labelle @ Dec 18 2013, 06:38 PM)
no subtitle.. i watch in tgv 1u..
*
Alright thanks
Razortooth
post Dec 19 2013, 04:09 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
88 posts

Joined: Jun 2013
From: Shadow of Mordor


Well, before watching the second movie, I already found out that there will be another sequel. But I still expected Smaug to be slain in this one.

"I am fire~~~"
axoloke
post Dec 19 2013, 03:10 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
631 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pearl Of The Orient


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


Agreed for the most part....lots and lots of changes from the book and the tone of the movie seemed off. Not as consistent as the LOTR Trilogy. I might watch it again to see if my feel for it changes.

Just some random thoughts :

1.) Beorn appeared in just a blink, a glorified cameo??
2.) Tauriel/Kili/Legolas story....undercooked and the elves appeared like superheroes.
3.) The Bard background story with his ancestor knocking off one of the scales....I thought that was a good change, made it streamlined and linked nicely.
4.) Azog - annoying character change in Part 1 and still somewhat annoying in Part 2.
5.) Smaug chasing dwarves - Totally made up. If I remember correctly, Bilbo managed to escape, Smaug was cunning enough to realize Barrel-rider meant he got help from Laketown, hence he got angry and went to smack them.


axoloke
post Dec 19 2013, 03:23 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
631 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Pearl Of The Orient


» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


I can't remember the exact timeline right now too...

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «



maranello55
post Dec 19 2013, 05:09 PM

Accelera Ayrton!!
*******
Senior Member
3,385 posts

Joined: Aug 2006
From: Sao Paolo, Brazil



QUOTE(axoloke @ Dec 19 2013, 03:23 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


I can't remember the exact timeline right now too...

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

*
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

Mov_freak
post Dec 21 2013, 02:27 AM

aka. Nickelodein Weirdo
Group Icon
Moderator
1,723 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug (2013)

at 1Utama's Atmos Theater (Hall 3) + 48fps 3D

First of all, I choose the Atmos Theater, Dolby's brand new Surround system.

Just before the movie started, Dolby had a few "show off" Dolby teaser they were VERY impressive!!

So did it add to the movie... Well, no... I do not think the movie was mixed for the system... (layman's opinion)

As for the movie, again impressive 3D in 48fps.

Storytelling is slightly better compared to the first

Smaug (The Dragon) was really REALLY well done.

I do have a little complain though...
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «

The barrel scene is amazing!

The ending.... I think could have been a little more subtle...

I just hope the third comes out during the summer of 2014 rather then fall...

My Two Sen
pkh
post Dec 22 2013, 12:50 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
316 posts

Joined: Nov 2005
From: Saya Berjaya


Before I watched it, heard LOTS of comments about the WTF ending. So, here's what I initially though will happen - Bilbo masuk the dragon lair, show dragon head, then credits roll. But I was wrong. Very wrong. And I don't have any problems with the overall ending.

Between Atmos and THX, it's a gamble. Those who saw it in Atmos had positive comments on the barrel scene. Coz Atmos is built mainly on surround. Those who watched in THX had positive comments on the dragon scene. Coz THX is mainly on 'kick'. Obviously, Atmos can deliver the same 'kick' as THX but you can find alot of comments saying that they recessed the Atmos punch for unknown reasons.

Oh, and for the first time, I saw Legolas got slightly hurt. Not as badly as Aragon. But he 'was' near immortal in LOTR123.
SUSAzurues
post Dec 22 2013, 12:57 AM

▲▲▲▲
*****
Senior Member
958 posts

Joined: Aug 2007
From: forum.lowyat.net



No idea how are they gonna fit the battle of the five armies in the next movie considering the ending of the Desolation of Smaug.

Unless it is an extremely long one, other than that i can't seen it be fulfill with so much screentime for other not so relevant character.
LightningZERO
post Dec 25 2013, 03:52 PM

The Golden Knight
******
Senior Member
1,696 posts

Joined: Feb 2007
From: Penang


I watch Hobbit II without watching any of the LOTR movies..

At first the dwarf's quests were pretty good. But once Bilbo went into the mountain and faced Smaug, the whole movie pretty much went to hell for me. The whole "fights" against Smaug was so silly and dragged on far too long unnecessarily. The whole hide and seek with the Smaug was way too ridiculous and Smaug was really incompetent. Do you seriously want me to believe that somehow, dragon fire was useless if you hide behind pillars? For all the rampage inside the mountain and all those fire breathings, somehow none of the dwarfs bit it? Ugghh
masterelr
post Dec 25 2013, 05:51 PM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,003 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: KL


QUOTE(Mov_freak @ Dec 21 2013, 02:27 AM)
I just hope the third comes out during the summer of 2014 rather then fall...

*
Its already confirmed it will be out next December.
Mov_freak
post Dec 25 2013, 07:25 PM

aka. Nickelodein Weirdo
Group Icon
Moderator
1,723 posts

Joined: Feb 2009


QUOTE(masterelr @ Dec 25 2013, 05:51 PM)
Its already confirmed it will be out next December.
*
cry.gif
JustcallmeLarry
post Dec 26 2013, 03:46 AM

Regular
******
Senior Member
1,363 posts

Joined: Jan 2010


The cgi for this movie was a joke for the money spent on it. Especially the starting when they ride the horse on the mountain. I laugh.
+Newbie+
post Dec 26 2013, 07:04 PM

To be needed as The Sand's Kazekage
Group Icon
VIP
3,055 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
One thing everyone needs to know. The Hobbit was actually more of a children's book. tongue.gif

And it was one small book only. PJ decided to stretch 1 book into 3 movies. This is the biggest criticism of this movie. It's so full of unnecessary material that really neither adds to the lore nor adds to the movie. Instead, they detract from the main movie storyline as a whole.

» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «


With all these criticisms of the movie, you would think that I hated this movie. Au contraire. Overall, I still think the movie is between average to slightly above average. Being given another chance to glimpse into the brilliant world and lore of Middle Earth is just too good to turn down. It also managed to entertain for most parts of its 2 hours 40 mins running time. I just think that it should have been shorter and better.

This post has been edited by +Newbie+: Dec 26 2013, 07:05 PM
kadS
post Jan 4 2014, 07:07 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
344 posts

Joined: Jun 2006
From: Springfield
im not a die hard fans LOTR movies but i do watch all of them and the first Hobbit and i dont really remember about the storyline sweat.gif . so, my silly question is why did Smaug attacked Erebor at the first place and why he is still there?
rlky
post Jan 4 2014, 07:10 AM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
186 posts

Joined: May 2011
From: Ipoh
QUOTE(kadS @ Jan 4 2014, 07:07 AM)
im not a die hard fans LOTR movies but i do watch all of them and the first Hobbit and i dont really remember about the storyline  sweat.gif . so, my silly question is why did Smaug attacked Erebor at the first place and why he is still there?
*
Cause dragons are attracted to gold and wealth
ComposMentis
post Jan 4 2014, 10:37 AM

Casual
***
Junior Member
420 posts

Joined: May 2010
QUOTE(kadS @ Jan 4 2014, 07:07 AM)
im not a die hard fans LOTR movies but i do watch all of them and the first Hobbit and i dont really remember about the storyline  sweat.gif . so, my silly question is why did Smaug attacked Erebor at the first place and why he is still there?
*
Out of greediness and unexplained affinity for gold.
tjayy09
post Jan 4 2014, 10:33 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
391 posts

Joined: Dec 2011
From: Kuala lumpur



QUOTE(patienceGNR @ Dec 18 2013, 10:15 AM)
I don't quite like movies with subtitles, especially in Mandarin/Malay. Block quarter of the screen.
Back on topic about the second movie,

"Oh no, what have we done?"

FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU PETER JACKSON Y U DO DIS

Got to wait for the next installment cry.gif
*

lol i thought everyone know dy its a 3 part thing.
Sifha238
post Jan 4 2014, 10:35 PM

Casual
***
Junior Member
454 posts

Joined: Oct 2009


Does it mean Evangeline lily married to the hobbit and their son Frodo ?
patienceGNR
post Jan 4 2014, 11:21 PM

♥ Ride All Day ♥
*******
Senior Member
2,058 posts

Joined: Mar 2011
From: Today: 9:03 AM



QUOTE(tjayy09 @ Jan 4 2014, 10:33 PM)
lol i thought everyone know dy its a 3 part thing.
*
Already know will be trilogy but I didn't expect to end just right here. tongue.gif

43 Pages « < 32 33 34 35 36 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0267sec    0.70    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 10th December 2025 - 04:55 PM