QUOTE(yuexia @ Jun 7 2008, 12:49 PM)
Sir Azarimy, can you tell me why you think HKU is one of the best archi schools in Asia? i'm still considering HKU or local unis...
i personally think the most exciting thing about HKU is its visiting lecturers

i read that Jean Nouvel and I.M.Pei lectured in HKU before (*_*) to think those people actually standing in front of the lecture hall
talking to you!! (*_*) okay, maybe i'm overreacting

so, question: do students really benefit from these visiting lecturers? how long do they usually stay at the university? i went to UTM's website but couldn't find any news relating to its previous/current visiting lecturers...can forumers from UTM Arch or other unis share your views on your lecturers/visiting lecturers? how do the universities invite these famous architects anyway?
i'm not trying to imply that local unis are not good (cos' i'm most probably going to local uni after all

) but what is the difference between local archi schools and other overseas archi schools? the facilities? we have labs and studios complete with the latest designing softwares for students, don't we? the teaching methods? i believe our lecturers and profs probably graduated from renowned schools too (although their CVs are not listed on the UTM FBE's website so i can't really check) and from the quotes below---
---i know that UTM profs/lecturers are great too...so? what else?
whenever i tell my mom the reason *i think* HKU Arch is a good school, she'll say 'how do you know local unis don't have/do that?'. that's what i want to know too. what is it that makes our unis less sought-after than Cambridge, Bartlett, etc? (i mean architecture schools in those unis)
HKU have some of the leaders in specialized fields of architecture under one roof. we're not just talking about experts, but the leader to the experts around the world. their facilities are also top notch, but their main strength is their expertise and the raw brain power behind it.
it really depends on ur preference, really. some people benefit from training under the best. others prefer lecturers or architects that allow themselves to bloom. big difference between the two. top architects/designers have a huge ego, and u have to compensate (read: sacrifice ur own ego) in order absorb their expertise. if u're just a noob student who likes to sit and listen to lectures, then perhaps u wont be acquiring the full benefit of studying under an expert.
looking back at local universities, we do have expert or professional architects as visiting professors. for example in UTM, we've had mario botta and bryan lawson before. other top architects have also visited UM and USM. and sometimes they dont visit local universities, but rather conduct a programme under LAM/PAM in KL which we all can attend. but ofcourse, nothing beats studying directly under them.
but dont compare facility wise, bcoz even UTM tops bartlett anytime. they have crappy facilities, and even worse toilets than puduraya. but the service is top notch, as one could expect from any british schools. facilities of architecture schools doesnt really mean anything. it's what u do with what u have that counts.
QUOTE(aprisis @ Jun 8 2008, 12:15 PM)
azarimy, i found that alfa offers architecture course, but do they really live up with their claim as no.1 architecture school in msia?
alot of people can claim alot of things. but can they back it up?
ALFA have yet to achieve a part 1 accreditation. so claiming no. 1 is pure bullshit to me.
QUOTE(miss V @ Jun 11 2008, 09:47 AM)
hi.
saya nak tanyer sesiapa dekat sini tahu tentang subjek8 diploma seni bina..
pertolongan anda sangat dihargai,,huhuh..=p
Added on June 11, 2008, 8:29 pmcan anyone help me bout subjects in dip architcture..
can u be more specific? what kinda help do u need?
by the way, i'm on vacation in egypt right now. so my next reply would probably be next week. ciao!