Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

44 Pages « < 19 20 21 22 23 > » Bottom

Outline · [ Standard ] · Linear+

 ICAP, traded price higher than NAV

views
     
prophetjul
post Feb 28 2013, 08:48 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,279 posts

Joined: Oct 2010

QUOTE(rivacordex @ Feb 27 2013, 06:26 PM)
Makes a lot of sense there! And if one would like to not feel the pain of "discounting" of NAV to stock price of the CEF, then, one can also mirror TTB's holdings on these! smile.gif
*
Provided you can trust Tan teng BOO! 's judgement!

Trust him to say : " ......Our NAV has gained 189% since listing or 18% per annum. At such a rate, in seven years time, it would be RM8.78. We give consistent long-term returns,”

Its no longer 18% pa...............its 25%!

rclxms.gif rclxms.gif rclxms.gif
lifeless_creature
post Mar 6 2013, 10:22 PM

The Kid
******
Senior Member
1,219 posts

Joined: Jan 2003
From: Penang


QUOTE(bryan5073 @ Feb 27 2013, 11:52 PM)
IMO, NAV means nothing if there's nobody buying the stock to push the stock price up...
At the end of the day, stock price (capital gain) and dividend yield are what really counts!
Becoz these are the things that goes into our pocket, not NAV...
Just my opinion wink.gif
*
i think i agree with bryan, icap doesn't give dividends, its volume is low, low liquidity will certainly affects its stock price. Everyone knows its NAV is higher than its stock price, but who wants to push the stock price to match its NAV??
kinwing
post Mar 7 2013, 10:53 PM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(lifeless_creature @ Mar 6 2013, 10:22 PM)
i think i agree with bryan, icap doesn't give dividends, its volume is low, low liquidity will certainly affects its stock price. Everyone knows its NAV is higher than its stock price, but who wants to push the stock price to match its NAV??
*
That does not matter, ICAP share price is not important to me tongue.gif .
prophetjul
post Mar 8 2013, 08:30 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,279 posts

Joined: Oct 2010

QUOTE(lifeless_creature @ Mar 6 2013, 10:22 PM)
i think i agree with bryan, icap doesn't give dividends, its volume is low, low liquidity will certainly affects its stock price. Everyone knows its NAV is higher than its stock price, but who wants to push the stock price to match its NAV??
*
Ask Mr Tan to buyback share to push the price up.......... biggrin.gif

Afterall Icap has ltsa cash........
kinwing
post Mar 8 2013, 09:00 AM

On my way
****
Senior Member
559 posts

Joined: Mar 2010
From: Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur


QUOTE(prophetjul @ Mar 8 2013, 08:30 AM)
Ask Mr Tan to buyback share to push the price up..........  biggrin.gif

Afterall Icap has ltsa cash........
*
Too bad, most of the shareholders won't allow Tan to do share buyback tongue.gif .
prophetjul
post May 16 2013, 09:31 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,279 posts

Joined: Oct 2010

QUOTE(prophetjul @ Feb 28 2013, 08:48 AM)
Provided you can trust Tan teng BOO! 's judgement!

Trust him to say :  "  ......Our NAV has gained 189% since listing or 18% per annum. At such a rate, in seven years time, it would be RM8.78. We give consistent long-term returns,”

Its no longer 18% pa...............its 25%! 

rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif  rclxms.gif
*
ICAP Rm2.38.......... HOW?
davinz18
post Jul 2 2013, 06:16 PM

начинаещ
*******
Senior Member
7,142 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Sin City



iCapital.biz earnings jumps to RM47mil

iCapital.biz Bhd’s net profit for its fourth quarter jumped to RM47.12mil from RM1.7mil a year ago due to profit on disposal of securities and higher revenue.

Its revenue increased to RM49mil from RM4.5mil a year ago. Earnings per share were 33.66 sen compared to 1.22 sen a year ago.

For its full year, the group posted a net profit of RM56.8mil from RM15.7mil a year ago. Its full year’s revenue stood at RM65.9mil compared to RM24.8mil a year ago.

“As the company is a closed-end fund, a better indication of its performance would be the movement of its Net Assets Value (NAV). The NAV per share as at May 31, 2013 was RM2.99, compared with NAV per share of RM2.86 as at May 31, 2012,” it said.
yok70
post Jul 4 2013, 07:02 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,698 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
From: kuala lumpur


QUOTE(davinz18 @ Jul 2 2013, 06:16 PM)
iCapital.biz earnings jumps to RM47mil

iCapital.biz Bhd’s net profit for its fourth quarter jumped to RM47.12mil from RM1.7mil a year ago due to profit on disposal of securities and higher revenue.

Its revenue increased to RM49mil from RM4.5mil a year ago. Earnings per share were 33.66 sen compared to 1.22 sen a year ago.

For its full year, the group posted a net profit of RM56.8mil from RM15.7mil a year ago. Its full year’s revenue stood at RM65.9mil compared to RM24.8mil a year ago.

“As the company is a closed-end fund, a better indication of its performance would be the movement of its Net Assets Value (NAV). The NAV per share as at May 31, 2013 was RM2.99, compared with NAV per share of RM2.86 as at May 31, 2012,” it said.
*
2.99 vs 2.86 = 4.54% upside for 1 year. This is rather bad performance for the year, I bet many forumers outperformed it largely.
However, icap is holding almost 50% cash now, which make it quite defensive in a way heading towards uncertainties of QE exit risk.
nod.gif


davinz18
post Aug 1 2013, 06:17 PM

начинаещ
*******
Senior Member
7,142 posts

Joined: Oct 2008
From: Sin City



On behalf of the Board of icapital.biz Berhad, we wish to announce that the Net Asset Value per share of icapital.biz Berhad as at 31 July 2013 was RM2.96.
prophetjul
post Aug 1 2013, 06:27 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,279 posts

Joined: Oct 2010

QUOTE(davinz18 @ Aug 1 2013, 06:17 PM)
On behalf of the Board of icapital.biz Berhad, we wish to announce that the Net Asset Value per share of icapital.biz Berhad as at 31 July 2013 was RM2.96.
*
rclxms.gif rclxms.gif rclxms.gif

POP* the Champagne! thumbup.gif
0932
post Aug 2 2013, 12:57 AM

New Member
*
Junior Member
15 posts

Joined: Aug 2010
Haha. I had sold off 80% of my iCap shares after holding for 5 years. I have to say I only manage to gain a little after holding for so long.

Reason Of selling is because ttb doesn't seem to be interested to invest in klse. Therefore I will only wait until he starts buying only I will act.

If you read his weekly Msian stock analysis. I can safely said 70% of them is buy at a price below the market price and the remaining 30% is hold. Haha. So there is nothing to buy. Eh sorry. There is one stock he recommends to buy, icapital. Haha
yok70
post Aug 2 2013, 01:20 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,698 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
From: kuala lumpur


QUOTE(0932 @ Aug 2 2013, 12:57 AM)
Haha. I had sold off 80% of my iCap shares after holding for 5 years. I have to say I only manage to gain a little after holding for so long.

Reason Of selling is because ttb doesn't seem to be interested to invest in klse. Therefore I will only wait until he starts buying only I will act.

If you read his weekly Msian stock analysis. I can safely said 70% of them is buy at a price below the market price and the remaining 30% is hold. Haha. So there is nothing to buy. Eh sorry. There is one stock he recommends to buy, icapital. Haha
*
icap only discount 19%, holding mostly midcap, so not consider cheap loh for midcap valuation. Now there are lots of midcaps trading at above 30% discount to FV.
ttb is just too conservative and too lazy to deal with icap malaysia. His holding has been minimum movement for more than 3 years now, still wait for another 5 years until world economy stabilize only want to make big move?
the cash holding is now above 50% is it?
however, for those who "do not like to loss money", icap seems like a good choice. it's quite hard to loss money i think after monitoring its NAV movement vs market up/down.
hmm.gif

This post has been edited by yok70: Aug 2 2013, 01:21 AM
prophetjul
post Aug 2 2013, 10:19 AM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,279 posts

Joined: Oct 2010

QUOTE(yok70 @ Aug 2 2013, 01:20 AM)
icap only discount 19%, holding mostly midcap, so not consider cheap loh for midcap valuation. Now there are lots of midcaps trading at above 30% discount to FV.
ttb is just too conservative and too lazy to deal with icap malaysia. His holding has been minimum movement for more than 3 years now, still wait for another 5 years until world economy stabilize only want to make big move?
the cash holding is now above 50% is it?
however, for those who "do not like to loss money", icap seems like a good choice. it's quite hard to loss money i think after monitoring its NAV movement vs market up/down.
hmm.gif
*
In the meantime, TTB thanks all the suiyees for the management fees and funding his lifestyle
blackking87
post Aug 15 2013, 11:31 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
89 posts

Joined: Jul 2012
Icaps discount is based on the market price of the security. It's true that a lot of midcaps are trading at a discount towards their book value, but ICAP's discount is not based on book value, but on market share.

Correct me if im wrong
hpcp
post Aug 16 2013, 03:38 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
106 posts

Joined: Jul 2009
It even underperformed fund managers' 5-year average return

wil-i-am
post Aug 16 2013, 03:55 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
10,001 posts

Joined: May 2013
QUOTE(blackking87 @ Aug 15 2013, 11:31 PM)
Icaps discount is based on the market price of the security. It's true that a lot of midcaps are trading at a discount towards their book value, but ICAP's discount is not based on book value, but on market share.

Correct me if im wrong
*
NAV is marked to market value
Yesterday NAV 2.99 -v- closing price 2.38
blackking87
post Aug 16 2013, 10:35 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
89 posts

Joined: Jul 2012
QUOTE(wil-i-am @ Aug 16 2013, 03:55 PM)
NAV is marked to market value
Yesterday NAV 2.99 -v- closing price 2.38
*
yes yes, that is what I meant.

The securities are being marked to market. Not to book value.

I was responding to another posters post.
wil-i-am
post Aug 16 2013, 10:43 PM

10k Club
********
Senior Member
10,001 posts

Joined: May 2013
QUOTE(blackking87 @ Aug 16 2013, 10:35 PM)
yes yes, that is what I meant.

The securities are being marked to market. Not to book value.

I was responding to another posters post.
*
They announce NAV on daily basis to Bursa. No one will adjust their book value on daily basis. After all, co close a/c on monthly basis
blackking87
post Aug 16 2013, 10:53 PM

Getting Started
**
Junior Member
89 posts

Joined: Jul 2012
QUOTE(wil-i-am @ Aug 16 2013, 10:43 PM)
They announce NAV on daily basis to Bursa. No one will adjust their book value on daily basis. After all, co close a/c on monthly basis
*
Actually I was responding to the quote below.


QUOTE(yok70 @ Aug 2 2013, 01:20 AM)
icap only discount 19%, holding mostly midcap, so not consider cheap loh for midcap valuation. Now there are lots of midcaps trading at above 30% discount to FV.
ttb is just too conservative and too lazy to deal with icap malaysia. His holding has been minimum movement for more than 3 years now, still wait for another 5 years until world economy stabilize only want to make big move?
the cash holding is now above 50% is it?
however, for those who "do not like to loss money", icap seems like a good choice. it's quite hard to loss money i think after monitoring its NAV movement vs market up/down.
hmm.gif
*
yok70
post Aug 18 2013, 07:53 PM

10k Club
********
All Stars
12,698 posts

Joined: Jun 2010
From: kuala lumpur


QUOTE(blackking87 @ Aug 15 2013, 11:31 PM)
Icaps discount is based on the market price of the security. It's true that a lot of midcaps are trading at a discount towards their book value, but ICAP's discount is not based on book value, but on market share.

Correct me if im wrong
*
The stocks that icap currently holding are not trading at low PE.
I'd 11 stocks that icap holding on my list, the PE are 33, 24, 19, 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9 and net loss (MSC).
none of them are close to average small-mid cap stocks at 6-8x.
cool2.gif

44 Pages « < 19 20 21 22 23 > » Top
 

Change to:
| Lo-Fi Version
0.0324sec    0.84    6 queries    GZIP Disabled
Time is now: 19th December 2025 - 08:46 AM