these days processor applications performance are not calculated by PI anymore. PI is just one way to bench your proc and should not be taken as the only result you need to grab a processor.

ongbs...u're down ....dblooi bro..u're my next target


Attached thumbnail(s)

haha, come on
i never afraid of challenges

opps sorry .... oc till stim.. @@

wah chun xD

eh my ice still got 3/4 pail...wasted

WALAU EH...this budak ah...wei...jangan lari ah...

Wait for me....wait ah...let me lap my F3, lap my waterblock, lap my hand 1st

jiak lat!

lol
u can do it... go for it

haha..everybody challenge like this only can beat intel ma

huh intel fan wanna war again...

huh? where?

http://forum.lowyat.net/topic/491075/+820
argue about heat
am i wrong?

This post has been edited by cyberloner: Dec 23 2007, 03:55 AM

i dont even know that arguement exist...lol

we better just ignore it la...we have our own road..

he wan say let him say la...just let ie be...

This post has been edited by dj.eRicZzz: Dec 23 2007, 04:04 AM

Database Updated

-pWs-

http://forum.lowyat.net/index.php?showtopi...post&p=14771718

u dun update mine

This post has been edited by cyberloner: Dec 23 2007, 06:55 AM

Updated
Sorry to have you left out

-pWs-

Supposedly yes, the higher latency is allowing it to clock higher, but it doesn't really seem to be like this for AMD's 65nm procs. Brisbane doesn't overclock better than Windsor, even G1 loses to F3 (only G2 pulls up even). I suspect it was due to design issues, the original cache controller design couldn't work properly under the different characteristics of smaller transistors. Its most likely, since Phenom's main issue is also the cache controller.

Its true for C2D & C2Q, but for AM2 its more like one Phenom = 1.5 Athlon X2 power consumption. Power consumption per core dropped quite a lot in G2, then Phenom.

Not really, PI is used to compare single core performance using basic instruction sets. Many applications still aren't multithreaded (especially games) and a fair number of apps don't really benefit from SSE so PI reflects performance in those applications.

While you're at it, you might as well remove the IHS..save all that trouble lapping..and get better temps too..
But don't do it if you're gonna use a clip on air cooler later on..only screw on coolers..clip on coolers are core crushers.

a bit off topic.........
well...interpret from what's bro clawhammer said,
i think he meant AMD thread is hotter / crowded


This post has been edited by dblooi: Dec 23 2007, 09:10 AM

Guys. I just got my 5000+ Black Edition yesterday at RM365.
Doing rock stable at 3.1Ghz. Multipler 15.5 set x 200 standard fsb.
Thinking to push more now.

SS pls
wow, just check your signature.
your rig really make me

edited: what's max multi that can use for 5000+ black?

This post has been edited by dblooi: Dec 23 2007, 09:34 AM

read the review i think its 25.5. ill check the bios later.
trying to rewire the cable in this casing take me a long time.
poorman rig ma, everymonth has to allocate some money to upgrade slowly.
after this planning for second 3870, 2 more gb ram.
still waiting for phenom to become stable.

cool. i attached later the ss. doing 3dmark now.