All the best for remaining 3 papers....a bit late to wish coz bz working lately....I thk im quite not up 2 date lately on acca happenings around...
How was P1 today? Curious to know the outcome since a new paper....hehe

juz come back from P1..
damn difficult paper...many of the answer cant get from book some more say is a theory paper...
the paper like a P3 paper but using C.G. to apply

so hard!!! where got theories. all critical thinking!!!

damn wasted study all those ethics mumbo jumbo. all have to use critical thinking. where got so much time to think that much in final! sux la. really. haih, if im at early stage of acca, sure quit do degree only better.

tomorrow p2. also no hope.

I felt P1 was quite manageable, although I have to draw attention to the inadequacy of our text, as many of the questions requires criticism and application outside that is provided by text.

possibility of passing is quite high, since I felt i approached the question well, although there were some rather pointless questions that didn't seem to make any immediate sense to me.

Well,it's a new paper. I knew right from the start that the materials we currently have was not gonna be too sufficient.
As for critical thinking, criticism and application outside the text (and what nots),it's a professional paper (i.e. part 3,i.e. core paper) Obviously they're gonna have stuff like that =.='''

As to how the paper was,section A was rather tricky/relatively vague in parts while section B was a lil more manageable. I think a pass should be quite attainable,erm,hopefully at least

This post has been edited by ellimist: Dec 10 2007, 07:45 PM

hahaha... and is it just me, or the mark allocation like very.. alot for some very stupid questions.

for me. i juz feel that only q2 is manageable..
if pass, i think i only ngam ngam pass~~

No,it's not just you.

*Look at question.....ok,I know this*
*Look at marks.... =.=*



The risk one? Yea I did that and Q4

That's the spirit,a pass is all we need

the thing i memorize all din come out
onli kohlberg and stakeholders
this time ...
next time ..
i didnt did q2 ...
the (a) i felt it was a trap... a simply risk trap ...
onli (b) and © i knew... so i turn to do the q3...at least i know wat chairman does

What was part (b) and © of q2 again? I did it but can't remember what the heck it was now

like? wats robust internal control?

---

Added on December 10, 2007, 8:28 pmgood job... becoz i forget also...
but i onli know i knew these 2 question onli .. which onli give me 12 point maximum ...tats y

This post has been edited by lawrence1437: Dec 10 2007, 08:28 PM

Haha screw it la,it's over already,hopefully can pass.

P2 tmrw,die wei >_>

Let me comment on today's P1 as well..

I think the paper was fairly ok n up to the point.. And most important, the examiner put it the same style as in the pilot paper.. So, i dun think you all should get any much suprises.. This is level 3 professional paper, requires some critical arguement (in basic term, common sense)..

As the marks allocation (as ThanatosSwiftfire's claim), I also feel abit too much for the amount of points, but i evaluate longer to suit up the marks..

About the outside syllabus matter, i dun think any of acca final part level, u bring ur textbook to exam hall help not that much rite.? At least the examiner asking all qn within the scope of syllabus.. N most of the points i think my lecturer (sheila) did cover with us in the class,

Haha, lucky, my decision to ignore ethics' part is correct.. Throw out Q4 optional, the paper nothing much of ethics ady.. hehe, u will study so much lesser without the ethics stuff.. Ignore ethics n still can answer all the question..

Dun worry, be happie.. A reliable source says this sitting P1 passing rate will not be low..!! So, wait n see la till 18th feb.. cheerz..

part c is the remuneration package and b i forget le~~haha
i juz know part b is a 5 mark question~~
and the Q1 kohlberg question, the second part de is wat ar?
anyone know ?
cant find in any text..

my comment bout tis paper is...P1.. is doable.. only section A cost me half pages of answer booklet..i think i did section b around 4.55-5pm.. still manageable to finish it,but of cuz not 100% complete.. i answered Q4..ethics on gray,owen,adam thingy,also on stakeholder..did the CEO and chairman..but discard on risk..coz for me its Risky but huge marks consumed in the letter to investor part..16marks..took me 3 full pages.. my hand also tired,pain plus handwritting was so bad in the last few minutes..overall,hopefully this manageable,doable paper wont let the markers mark very strictly..there is a chance if paper easy, we all happy..at the end ..however,tis is a new paper..maybe the other way around.. and this examiner is an academician..he teaches at uni.newcastle..of coz question looks not so extremely difficult..

yeah, my p3 lecturer who also covers p1, says the passing rate will be intentionally low also. tomorrow f7 for me. XD

wooho! tomorrow last day

is on NED..The 4 roles of NED..and that 4 roles applied in the case.. how they ask u relate those 4 to the overstatement of malleria..

aiyo screw u i still got p3 on wednesday XD

i think is not NED right...coz the kohlberg part got 1 more part is related to moral development xxxx...
develop by Gary xxx( not remember wats the name liao)~


for the NED i think the 4 role is not a problem..
but relates to case, the question ask that how the NED may experience those role in the case..
i juz create my own story since it say "MAY".