Best solution for you: dont buy bukit oug.


Case closed.

Haha thats what we call LPPL

How did you manage to buy the 791sf at rm160k last month ?

160k just last mth? Is this a typo or joke? @thx2012, u let the bkt oug unit to me la.

Haha thanx to a very good agent fren. And ofcoz there r conditions

The so call 230k? Dont wanna dissapoint you that this owner is playing a fool. If u want the agent number I can gv u then come back update us here boleh?

Still got lobang or not ? Pls introduce me. Tq.

This is part of the transaction unit...

A1-16-8, A1-17-1, A1-17-5, A1-17-8, A1-19-3A

http://kl.kehakiman.gov.my/sites/kl.kehaki...28-571-2005.pdf

I saw the full list is published in the new paper 1 year ago.

Walao.....why suddenly so hot here.....

Bro Keith......any kang tao.....i oso want to buy .....

If still got 160k i oso want oh.....

Actually quite a number of owners are playing a fool. They only want to test market for the actual price willing to be paid by potential buyers. Pity those poor agents who have to do all the sales talk and running around and yet no transaction in the end as owner said KIV first.

This post has been edited by yeeck: Apr 24 2013, 11:37 AM

Other conditions? If I'm the agent i will also keep it for myself...hahaha. Other conditions? Hmm...under table money?

So long winded and technical! Can someone explain in lay man term?

I think this case similar to ur case, take sometime to read through maybe you can get some hint from here. Good luck bro.

The case mentioned is that the S&P took place on 14-11-2005 and it's after commencement of winding-up - paragraph No 1.

Is that similar ?

Too lazy to read the rest. But I think the date of commencement of winding-up is important.

In my friend's case, the S&P between seller and Sri Keladi involving the use of credit notes was way back in 2000. So it shouldn't be affected by the winding up period between 2005-2006.

After I re-read back CMMC's posts, I think it was mentioned that the commencement of winding up starts August 2005, so it was concluded somewhere 2006 (?). So any transactions between this period of time, the court will likely favour to the Ler Lum, the liquidator.

Probably Ler Lum is just looking for some kind of compensation, so go and settle with them looks like a reasonable move.

Your friend's case it's totally different legal basis from CMMC's case.

Yes, I just got confirmation from her that Ler Lum is now just expecting the latest S&P and latest maintenance receipts. Looks like they have backed off from the initial threat of confiscating the property.

Bro sekalian all should come out yamcha get to know each other we share our stories ler. Seems like avbody has their own story to tell. I will bring my S&P

Eventually, the transaction is made before Sri Keladi Wind up.

"Sri Keladi Sdn Bhd had been wound up on 16th November 2005 and Ler Lum had been appointed pursuant to the Order of the High Court on 7th September 2006."