QUOTE(dblooi @ Oct 30 2007, 08:55 PM)
well, i heard that black 5000+ max at 3.2GHz , another typical brisbane
are you still going with it?

The thing is, though it maxes out similar to brisbane, reaching 3.0Ghz is now dirt easy even with the stock cooler..
In fact you could even slow down the fan and it'll still be cool enough to be stable..
QUOTE(-pWs- @ Oct 31 2007, 03:11 PM)
Yup...you are right.

Hahaa....I think AMD still lose.
-pWs- Sadly, I think your statement is likely to turn out correct. Just saw tomshardware's review of their Penryn engineering samples, Phenom will have to pull out a miracle (like clock 4+Ghz)to beat it. There might be some hope with Deneb (45nm version of Agena), which will be out in the middle to end of next year. Shanghai (45nm of Barcelona) will be out within the first half of next year.
QUOTE(sempronic @ Oct 31 2007, 11:18 PM)
phenom ar??
Phenom X2
Phenom X3
Phenom X4
wahh????
the rare thing is the phenom X3....heheh...maybe one of the core is disable....

Yup, one of the cores is disabled. Official statement by AMD, though I can't find the page.
QUOTE(cyberloner @ Nov 1 2007, 12:06 AM)
just hope it kills c2d =.=
Wait for the next architecture - Bulldozer.
QUOTE(coolblade @ Nov 2 2007, 09:20 PM)
» Click to show Spoiler - click again to hide... «
Independent core clocking with Phenom? Very nice indeed!
Sorry if it not related to this thread...
But I see the potential of independent overclocking of each core especially to these overclocker freaks such as dblooi

Forgot about that..yup, its one of the really cool features of Phenom. And unfortunately it will be sorely needed to compete with Penryn where power consumption is concerned (the quad core Penryn uses only 7x watts-measured by tomshardware).
This post has been edited by lohwenli: Nov 5 2007, 12:09 AM