QUOTE(gashout @ Jun 23 2023, 08:23 AM)
as you grow older, every 1 year of working really boosts the saving.
20k a month to spend is irresistible if only 5 year is needed to get that 10k extra per mth passive income.
What if it took an extra 10 years? Or longer?
Would you ever regret the time lost pursuing more passive income over enjoying more of life or time with loved ones etc.?
QUOTE(soul78 @ Jun 23 2023, 08:50 AM)
My concern is that we FIRE too early and estimated short on what was needed to retire fully to only go back to work at 60-80 coz they found out the passive/money they have would not be able to sustain them till their last days...
Here then lies the crux that money again drives and compels us to work, would we not then be considered achieved "financially independence" in this case?.
Great points!
I almost lost my life years ago and I've lost everything financially - twice - at 32 and 40.
Those experiences have reshaped my perspective on work/life balance and FIRE greatly.
I've completely reconfigured the concept of retirement in my mind.
The default notion of birth, school, work, retire, die - just doesn't make any sense to me.
We can all probably agree that having more money makes life easier.
But life is relatively short and our time alive is never guaranteed.
Plus, my needs/wants will diminish greatly as I get older so my lower expenses and rising inflation should form an equilibrium.
I also won't have either the will or the strength to pursue what I enjoy today as I age.
I would be completely ok with going broke when I'm older, with less mobility or mental acuity.
But I wouldn't be ok with missing the opportunity of living more of life with less money earlier if given the chance.
FIREing is a great goal but I believe it shouldn't be absolute.
Slowly cutting down on work over time towards FIREing is one option.
And/or staying active while you LEAN/BARISTA FIRE also present more achievable and sustainable alternatives.
This post has been edited by blingless: Jun 23 2023, 10:36 AM