KUALA LUMPUR: Kementerian Kesihatan (KKM) tidak menolak kemungkinan meluluskan penggunaan Ivermectin bagi merawat pesakit COVID-19 jika terdapat bukti kukuh menjelaskan keberkesanan dan kesan sampingannya.

Ketua Pengarah Kesihatan, Tan Sri Dr Noor Hisham Abdullah, berkata KKM ketika ini hanya membenarkan penggunaan Ivermectin secara 'off label' (ubat di luar indikasi tertera dalam label dan belum atau di luar persetujuan badan atau lembaga bertanggungjawab) sehingga kajian menyeluruh dijalankan.



"Sekarang ini kita boleh gunakan Ivermectin dalam negara dan Bahagian Regulatori Farmasi Negara (NPRA) sudah meluluskan penggunaan 'off label' seperti digunakan dulu untuk ubat anti malaria dan HIV.

"Penggunaannya tidak didaftarkan, tetapi dibenarkan sehingga kita ada bukti kukuh," katanya ketika diundang sebagai panel program The Nation, bertajuk 'COVID-19: Apa Lagi Ikhtiar Kita' yang disiarkan secara langsung menerusi BERNAMA TV malam tadi.


Ivermectin adalah sejenis ubat antiparasit diluluskan Pentadbiran Makanan dan Ubat-Ubatan (FDA) yang digunakan secara meluas bagi rawatan beberapa penyakit tropika terabai, termasuk onchocerciasis, strongyloidiasis dan helminthiases.

Mengulas lanjut, Dr Noor Hisham berkata, KKM juga giat menjalankan kajian untuk mengenal pasti keberkesanan dan kesan sampingannya bagi pesakit COVID-19 kategori tiga, empat dan lima.

"Ivermectin adalah ubat antiparasit yang dikenal pasti dari tahun 70-an dan ia ada kesan antiviral. Saya sendiri sekitar empat tahun lalu mengesyorkan penggunaannya untuk (merawat) denggi.

"Saya kemukakan cadangan ini kerana Ivermectin ada kesan antiviral. Kita sudah menjalankan kajian di Thailand dan kajian permulaan menunjukkan untuk mendapatkan kesan antiviral ini, dosnya amat tinggi," katanya.

Beliau menjelaskan, terdapat kesan sampingan Ivermectin yang tidak dimaklumkan, antaranya Ataxia atau masalah keseimbangan, sawan dan seumpamanya.

Mengulas kemungkinan ubat itu akan dipertimbangkan untuk merawat pesakit COVID-19, Dr Noor Hisham berkata, perkara berkenaan masih dalam penelitian.

"Insya-Allah, ada yang kita sudah benarkan penggunaan secara off label, tetapi dengan pemantauan rapi petugas hospital," katanya.

Pada awal bulan lalu, KKM dan Institut Penyelidikan Klinikal (ICR) memulakan ujian klinikal bagi mengkaji kesan penggunaan serta keberkesanan Ivermectin untuk pesakit COVID-19 yang berisiko tinggi di 12 hospital di bawah kementerian itu.

Dr Noor Hisham sebelum ini menjelaskan, setakat ini Pertubuhan Kesihatan Sedunia (WHO) membenarkan Ivermectin sebagai rawatan COVID-19 dalam kajian atau percubaan klinikal saja.

Bagaimanapun, keengganan KKM menggunakan Ivermectin mengundang ketidakpuasan hati ramai, termasuk doktor pakar dan persatuan pengguna.

Antivax rejoice!

More prove humanity is just doing trial and error on everyone's life.
Take all claims with caution

Thanks DG, and may god bless.


Now, to make sure no dumbass nurse triples the 3mg into horse dosage territory, where all of the reported side-effects/dangers comes from.


sigh, on hindsight most woulda kept quiet too.

So you are one of the antivax ya. Didn't register for vaccine at all?

"jika terdapat bukti kukuh" means u wait long long until hard proof comes along ok ?

so the medicine does work then, interrsting...

tat's why hospitals in Mehico are empty

That's why in India deaths going down drastically after the media scare of 400k+ cases per day despite only 5% vaccinated.

But /k/ said all story about ivermectin are fakes and they said the the drugs can only be used on animal. So is this mean kkm want to kill people?

most drug in the world are made for human, except it is tested on animal first. many medication that you get from vet are the same used for human, except for recomendation dosage is different (e.g drug used for cat have smaller dosage vs human wan)

this research paper said ivermetin help reduce fatality by 56%, it does have a good merit
https://academic.oup.com/ofid/advance-artic...ofab358/6316214

India from 400k daily to 40k n deaths dropped from 5k to 1k in 1 month!

uturn, jangan tak uturn

Thank you captain obvious, You should tell this to the people that dint believe that other countries use this drug for covid19 last time

This post has been edited by blackamikaze: Jul 11 2021, 06:42 AM

Thank you captain obvious, you should tell this to the people that dint believe that other countries use this drug for covid19 last time

This post has been edited by blackamikaze: Jul 11 2021, 06:42 AM

this drug does NOT guarantee or replaces vaccination....

it reduces your chances to ICU.

aside that prep for real side effects like liver, pancreas, kidney impact/risk....

note, it would be good if they did studies together with other drugs that offer better boosted safety to reduce ICU.

The recommended dosage is 12-16mg daily depending on your body weight but this is the standard for most normal weight adults. 200ug/kg bw/day.

took that dumb so long to understand it's usefulness to avoid jailtime over crime against humanity, but too late.

Many studies included were not peer reviewed and a wide range of doses were evaluated.

Lol

Lulz you are talking about the dumb lawsuit india start at india kangaroo Court to charge WHO officer right? It is funny that the person they charged is also indian abit female. Look like that country has issue when being told off by women

keyword: may

He got no choice now but to allow ivermectine

mRNA VACCINE INVENTOR CALLS FOR STOP OF COVID VAX
https://thehighwire.com/videos/mrna-vaccine...p-of-covid-vax/

go watch that video.

Maybe consider to allow = allow

BTW Robert malone is not inventor of mRNA vaccine

When they used Ivermectin together with other drugs (epidemiological studies, cohort studies etc), these were slammed by critics as confounding factors. Hence to them the only evidence acceptable is dbRCT using Ivermectin as the sole source of intervention vs placebo (not standard of care as this is another source of confounding).

This post has been edited by diffyhelman2: Jul 11 2021, 08:18 AM

sometime i think its funny
experimental and fast tracked vac, ok
off use ivm, no

wtf

said many times b4, we r in shit
if it works or shown to be somewhat working, then use it

happy kkm started off use for ivm
hopeful for positive clinical trial result by kkm

and all this is risk mgmt

if there is no pressure, u think ppl wanna any c19 vac? no bloody way
we weight the risk of a fast track vac
same goes for any alleged miracle drug against c19

how many people could have been saved, then only accept.......

ini masa perang, bukan masa biasa....

bodo

All vaccine has done clinical trial prior

And ivermectin has none, period

by "reducing", do u mean this?

Lel. Another Malone.

Betul laa tu.

They had not approved it for COVID-19. At the moment, they're considering allowing it's use.

This post has been edited by azarimy: Jul 11 2021, 08:28 AM

That video sounded like conspiracy scam ler

Miracle drug sounds like scam ler

Betul ke? Mcm scam jer. Jgn2 kena tipu beb.

Maybe pressured by antivax?

that video is 1 hour 40 mins, but it took you 27 mins to reply me with your con-clusion. LOL

The Malone video has been discredited and debunked many times liao

so they seriously think we have the luxury of “probably maybe”? 9k + 9k seem ok numbers then.

ofcause debunk by the manufacturer lah.. u think they will let u get in the way of their fortunes?

Dah dah dah.

You are just another tin kosong. No substance

https://www.logically.ai/factchecks/library/3aa2eefd

The Lancet peer reviewed study confirms vaccine efficacy, not at 95%, but as:

* Astra Zeneca 1.3%
* Moderna 1.2%
* J&J 1.2%
* Pfizer 0.84%

They deceived everyone by reporting Relative Risk Reduction (RRR) rather than Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR)
https://www.thelancet.com/action/showPdf?pi...%2821%2900069-0

https://twitter.com/MindshockPod/status/1414007190898229250

it's ok please stay naive and innocent, you look cute that way.

...

This post has been edited by lowya: Jul 11 2021, 08:48 AM

Thats why some will survive

kalau bagi makan lepas tu ada kesan sampingan dan mati pun marah kkm juga.

bagi makan nanti apa apa kkm kena , tak bagi makan pun kena marah lambat

Is all other vaccine (non-covid19) using ARR or RRR? What is flu vaccine ARR?

If flu vaccine ARR same as Covid-19 vaccine ARR, what will be the conclusion?

wait, did he not also say that the ivermectin was prescribed only for the clinical trial?

“Let’s say a study enrolled 20,000 patients into the control group and 20,000 in the vaccine group. In that study, 200 people in the control group got sick and 0 people in the vaccine group got sick. Even though the vaccine efficacy would be a whopping 100%, the ARR would show that vaccines reduce the absolute risk by just 1% (200/20,000= 1%). For the ARR to increase to 20% in our example study with a vaccine with 100% efficacy, 4,000 of the 20,000 people in the control group would have to get sick (4,000/20,000= 20%).”

see the issue with ARR?

the real issue is Vit D is likely to beat that ARR of vax of merely 1% out of it's living daylight. 20k subject is not even enough to represent human genome, worse to use RRR for marketing to 3 years olds.

do u know what is <1% ARR called? placeabo. Almost do nothing to reduce your risk, except maybe increase it as we found out later on:

how many times u want me to explain this? Please don't reply me, i don't want to waste more time on people that don't matter to me.

PRE-COVID and pre-MRNA time, flu shots in US has already been proven futile. Given mRNA technology is very unstable, would it be wise for a doctor to prescribe it to his "patients" who are not even sick?

getting positive in covid test means yr body has recognized the virus, it doesn't mean you are sick. But if u want to change the definition of sickness to pursue your agenda, obviously media will hey why not that's another profit for us when we got your attention, and the vicious cycle of fear churning more fearful decision goes on and on endlessly until the system wears off and soon u realized it one that this is all how virus works in our immune system in the evolution cycle, those control freaks are the real source of your Misérables.

b4 puak2 yang suggest ivermecin habis kena ludah by doctor nurse in socmed. now jilat ..

it shows malaysia jilat is bnyak

it is just an example on how arr is calculated.

again you just bring in some words without supporting evidence.............tin kosong je

U do realise science is about about trial and error right? U expect gawd to hand over the ultimate guidebook?

Every medicine we used had gone thru trial and error, they called it experiment, animal test trial, human test trial etc.

I was in US for ten years. Every winter the mass media and radio will mass advertise for “people to get their flu shots”. Mostly targeting the elderly. I never once took it. Every year only 50-60% take the flu shot. And US is one of the highest usage of flu vaccination shots in the world.

Here in Malaysia i dont think even 10% of the population ever take flu shot. Now suddenly govt is normalizing the idea of everyone must vaccinate or we can’t open up.

gov is their brain in the lack of brain.

Cukur

You jangan persoal messiahword.
Got messiah in nickname.

Janji can putar for atensi.

motives precede narratives; benefits precede motives

follow their motivations and benefits (money/power) to understand how the world works.

bodo.....pandai komen, tapi tak tahu baca

kalau bole baca, tak bole faham.....

kalau bole faham, maksud wang sudah poket...dari mana ?

https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/

Finally. No need to take those vaccine.
Well done msia!

It concludes, “Moderate-certainty evidence finds that large reductions in COVID-19 deaths are possible using ivermectin. Using ivermectin early in the clinical course may reduce numbers progressing to severe disease. The apparent safety and low cost suggest that ivermectin is likely to have a significant impact on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic globally.”

Ivermectin is a well-known, FDA-approved anti-parasite drug that has been used successfully for more than four decades to treat onchocerciasis “river blindness” and other parasitic diseases. It is one of the safest drugs known. It is on the WHO’s list of essential medicines, has been given 3.7 billion times around the globe, and has won the Nobel prize for its global and historic impacts in eradicating endemic parasitic infections in many parts of the world. Our medical discovery of a rapidly growing published medical evidence base, demonstrating ivermectin’s unique and highly potent ability to inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication and to suppress inflammation, prompted our team to use ivermectin for prevention and treatment in all stages of COVID-19.

https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/

low cost = no songlap opportunities

Take dy then we can officially kuda ?

songlap = big money

Pfizer quite experience.....can get penalty more than USD3bn....(yes, billion).....





https://violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org/parent/pfizer

since flu vaccine able to prevent all out flu pandemic, I think those numbers are fine.

Please vaccine yourself to help achieve herd immunity

Might as well ask them to test Fluvoxamine side by side. Time is of the essence.

If AZ ARR is just 1.3%... how do you explain drastic drop in number of deaths in UK despite surging cases? The only explanation is that the vaccine AZ works...right?

suddenly so many dogtor in /k/

I hope you can tell the difference between controlled clinical trials from side effects reported after approval release .
Did they disclosed risk of congenital heart failure during initial vaccine release or after?

dogtor YT n fB. later tiktoktor.

bodoh. dah lambat

off label means what?

It meant it is used for purpose other than its original intention.

10 people write the same paper not peer reviewed meh?

even one thousand name on it, it is still not peer reviewed

do you even science bro?

who says?

many scalpers now lurking around trying to sell ivermectin at 100x inflated price

big business here

that is why so many ivermectin tered flying around

then whats the definition of 'peer' here?. In IT changes request, before we submit for approval, our change request need to reviewed by peer once and those peer can be someone who sit beside you or even your underling.

you can explain whichever way u like, you can even say u prayed therefore god healed you too, why not? it doesn't matter to me how you want explain, as long as it pleases you right?

repurposed generic drugs has no profits to be made, such as HCQ use for malaria, Ivermectine used for parasites, and Metformin for diabestes.

they all have many repurposed stories that big pharma don't want you to know.

Lol.. it seems like you cannot explain why UK death rate so low despite surging Covid cases... as I said, the logical explanation is vaccines work....even in the US, the cases dropped straight down after vaccination ...there is no question that vaccine efficacy is more than 1.5%

But then uk and us does not use majority of inactivated virus based vaccine, then again, thats another topic altogether

because i do not argue with the incorrigibles

https://www.thestar.com.my/news/true-or-not...hmichI.whatsapp

talk like no talk..

it simply means if other kuasa besar country use then we use lor

Agree with you. I find it funny when people claim this and that has been confirmed by the manufacturer, or WHO, or FDA or scientists. They forget how easy it is to buy someone out.

if true, dr rafidah is a disgrace.but she really satu disgrace

by groups who have the knowledge to understand the research, but not involved in conducting the research at all

their appeal to authority is a fruit of decades of indoctrination teachings.

i reg'd last week or 2. Too busy w/ carddio & weights since oct, pandemic just so coincided with me self-curing my carp tunn and idiopathic haemmo'dal sciatica. I couldn't take the vacc coz i was cytokine storming bro, i realy dont mind it.

i reg'd last week or 2. Too busy w/ carddio & weights since oct, pandemic just so coincided with me self-curing my carp tunn and idiopathic haemmo'dal sciatica. I couldn't take the vacc coz i was cytokine storming bro, i realy dont mind it.

Scholarly peer review (also known as refereeing) is the process of subjecting an author's scholarly work, research, or ideas to the scrutiny of others who are experts in the same field, before a paper describing this work is published in a journal, conference proceedings or as a book. The peer review helps the publisher (that is, the editor-in-chief, the editorial board or the program committee) decide whether the work should be accepted, considered acceptable with revisions, or rejected.

Peer review requires a community of experts in a given (and often narrowly defined) field, who are qualified and able to perform reasonably impartial review. Impartial review, especially of work in less narrowly defined or inter-disciplinary fields, may be difficult to accomplish, and the significance (good or bad) of an idea may never be widely appreciated among its contemporaries. Peer review is generally considered necessary to academic quality and is used in most major scholarly journals. However, peer review does not entirely prevent publication of invalid research,[14] and as experimentally controlled studies of this process are difficult to arrange, direct evidence that peer review improves the quality of published papers is scarce.[15]

okay boss

Point taken🥳